Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

  		Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:13:37 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

22 dead in 2021, 17 in 2022, 6 in 2023.

Not sure any of those years warrant a trade for a guy that's worth just over 8 cents....if RB's are a dime a dozen.

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


Why would they give up their high picks for Cook if RBs are a dime a dozen?

Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important. Dime-a-dozen is my theory.



Dime a dozen works unless you have a top 3-5 RB.

When was the last time a team with a top 3-5 running back in the league won a Super Bowl? The reality is, top 3-5 running backs sell a lot of jerseys but they don't win a lot of championships.


We are in the Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes era.....that is a factor. When have we had a QB make 10 SB in his career.....before you trade a top 3-5 QB you better grab a similar QB.

Denver (Def and RB, Terrell Davis, Baltimore (Def and RB).

Best answer is 2018-19 Todd Gurley.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 2/5/2021 11:20:55 AM >

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 651
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:26:07 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22986
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

22 dead in 2021, 17 in 2022, 6 in 2023.

Not sure any of those years warrant a trade for a guy that's worth just over 8 cents....if RB's are a dime a dozen.

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


Why would they give up their high picks for Cook if RBs are a dime a dozen?

Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important. Dime-a-dozen is my theory.



Dime a dozen works unless you have a top 3-5 RB.

When was the last time a team with a top 3-5 running back in the league won a Super Bowl? The reality is, top 3-5 running backs sell a lot of jerseys but they don't win a lot of championships.


We are in the Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes era.....that is a factor. When have we had a QB make 10 SB in his career.....before you trade a top 3-5 QB you better grab a similar QB.

Denver (Def and RB, Terrell Davis, Baltimore (Def and RB).

Best answer is 2018-19 Todd Gurley.

Todd Gurley won a Super Bowl?

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 652
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:32:08 AM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

22 dead in 2021, 17 in 2022, 6 in 2023.

Not sure any of those years warrant a trade for a guy that's worth just over 8 cents....if RB's are a dime a dozen.

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


Why would they give up their high picks for Cook if RBs are a dime a dozen?

Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important. Dime-a-dozen is my theory.



Dime a dozen works unless you have a top 3-5 RB.

When was the last time a team with a top 3-5 running back in the league won a Super Bowl? The reality is, top 3-5 running backs sell a lot of jerseys but they don't win a lot of championships.


We are in the Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes era.....that is a factor. When have we had a QB make 10 SB in his career.....before you trade a top 3-5 QB you better grab a similar QB.

Denver (Def and RB, Terrell Davis, Baltimore (Def and RB).

Best answer is 2018-19 Todd Gurley.

NE 13
LA 3

So that's enough about that.

Baltimore averaged 3.3 YPC in that Super Bowl. So that's enough said about that.

BOLD attempt, but your points actually argue more for the other side.
Post #: 653
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:34:16 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

22 dead in 2021, 17 in 2022, 6 in 2023.

Not sure any of those years warrant a trade for a guy that's worth just over 8 cents....if RB's are a dime a dozen.

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


Why would they give up their high picks for Cook if RBs are a dime a dozen?

Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important. Dime-a-dozen is my theory.



Dime a dozen works unless you have a top 3-5 RB.

When was the last time a team with a top 3-5 running back in the league won a Super Bowl? The reality is, top 3-5 running backs sell a lot of jerseys but they don't win a lot of championships.


We are in the Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes era.....that is a factor. When have we had a QB make 10 SB in his career.....before you trade a top 3-5 QB you better grab a similar QB.

Denver (Def and RB, Terrell Davis, Baltimore (Def and RB).

Best answer is 2018-19 Todd Gurley.

Todd Gurley won a Super Bowl?


He lost a SB.

10 Carries, 35 yards. 1 reception, -1 yard for the game.

In the NFCCG he had 4 caries for 10 yards and 1 reception for 3 yards.
Post #: 654
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:38:24 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline 		The Baltimore "rushing and defense" SB was 20 years ago. The Broncos ones were 2 and 3 yers before that.

The 2012 Ravens and 2015 Broncos won with passing.
Post #: 655
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:38:49 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline 		OMG what a quick beatdown. Phil should STAY down on the canvas for the TKO.... but the three knockdown rule is in effect and he will probably take full advantage of it
Post #: 656
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:51:34 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

The Baltimore "rushing and defense" SB was 20 years ago. The Broncos ones were 2 and 3 yers before that.

The 2012 Ravens and 2015 Broncos won with passing.


2015 Broncos winning with passing was amazing considering the QB could barely throw the ball 10 yards

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 657
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 11:55:34 AM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

22 dead in 2021, 17 in 2022, 6 in 2023.

Not sure any of those years warrant a trade for a guy that's worth just over 8 cents....if RB's are a dime a dozen.

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


Why would they give up their high picks for Cook if RBs are a dime a dozen?

Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important. Dime-a-dozen is my theory.



Dime a dozen works unless you have a top 3-5 RB.

When was the last time a team with a top 3-5 running back in the league won a Super Bowl? The reality is, top 3-5 running backs sell a lot of jerseys but they don't win a lot of championships.


We are in the Tom Brady and Patrick Mahomes era.....that is a factor. When have we had a QB make 10 SB in his career.....before you trade a top 3-5 QB you better grab a similar QB.

Denver (Def and RB, Terrell Davis, Baltimore (Def and RB).

Best answer is 2018-19 Todd Gurley.

NE 13
LA 3

So that's enough about that.

Baltimore averaged 3.3 YPC in that Super Bowl. So that's enough said about that.

BOLD attempt, but your points actually argue more for the other side.


But it wasn't successful, so it can't have been bold.
Post #: 658
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 12:00:31 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

The Baltimore "rushing and defense" SB was 20 years ago. The Broncos ones were 2 and 3 yers before that.

The 2012 Ravens and 2015 Broncos won with passing.


2015 Broncos winning with passing was amazing considering the QB could barely throw the ball 10 yards


I'll walk that one back a little.

They were incredibly mediocre passing and rushing. they basically won with defense.

But the Hillman/Anderson RB tandem were definitely not studs.

< Message edited by David Levine -- 2/5/2021 12:01:43 PM >
Post #: 659
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 12:02:34 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

The Baltimore "rushing and defense" SB was 20 years ago. The Broncos ones were 2 and 3 yers before that.

The 2012 Ravens and 2015 Broncos won with passing.


2015 Broncos winning with passing was amazing considering the QB could barely throw the ball 10 yards


I'll walk that one back a little.

They were incredibly mediocre passing and rushing. they basically won with defense.

Yup.

And the 1997 and 98 versions that won two straight Superbowls did run well but they also had McCaffrey and Smith and IIRC Shannon Sharpe at TE and a QB, albeit one at the end of a HOF career who could still sling it.

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 660
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 1:03:15 PM   
Brad H


Posts: 22986
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline 		My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 661
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 1:25:41 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline 		My point would be, upgrading the roster won't mean much until you replace the coaching staff.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 662
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 1:55:13 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline 		I might do a research project at some point - if I have time, which I def do not at this point. The SB ran through NE for a long time. It will through KC for as long as Mahomes stays healthy. A good rushing attack is supposed to keep the opponents high scoring offense off the field. Has that been the case vs Mahomes so far? Is that the way to beat him? Shouldn't take long to look up all the losses and break down the rushing game.

I think to the first time the Bills played Mahomes. They dared KC to beat them with the run, and so KC did. Rushing for over 200 yards. I remember NE having very effective running games when they needed to.

While it is a passing game - more now than ever before, a good defense & scheme can take an element away from an offense. Super bowl offenses are able to adjust and win however needed. That doesn't mean I'm ok with the Cook contract. I thought and think it was stupid.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 663
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 2:18:23 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.

< Message edited by Mark Anderson -- 2/5/2021 2:19:27 PM >
Post #: 664
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 2:24:34 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."
Post #: 665
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 2:36:35 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."

Like a SB winning Coach and GM in New Orleans and a well respected coach in Tennessee.
Post #: 666
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 2:40:39 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."

Like a SB winning Coach and GM in New Orleans and a well respected coach in Tennessee.


I don't see him mentioning those teams, maybe I can't find the post you're referring to?

All I see is:

quote:

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.
Post #: 667
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:13:19 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."

Like a SB winning Coach and GM in New Orleans and a well respected coach in Tennessee.


I don't see him mentioning those teams, maybe I can't find the post you're referring to?

All I see is:

quote:

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


My point was:

Are you going to take advice on building a team from a SB winning Coach or a guy who trolls Viking fans when the team struggles?
Post #: 668
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:15:24 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."

Like a SB winning Coach and GM in New Orleans and a well respected coach in Tennessee.


I don't see him mentioning those teams, maybe I can't find the post you're referring to?

All I see is:

quote:

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


My point was:

Are you going to take advice on building a team from a SB winning Coach or a guy who trolls Viking fans when the team struggles?


Any RB is going to look good playing with Drew Brees.

Just like NE never had a stud RB with Brady, but everyone they plugged in did just fine.
Post #: 669
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:18:02 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."

Like a SB winning Coach and GM in New Orleans and a well respected coach in Tennessee.


I don't see him mentioning those teams, maybe I can't find the post you're referring to?

All I see is:

quote:

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


My point was:

Are you going to take advice on building a team from a SB winning Coach or a guy who trolls Viking fans when the team struggles?


Any RB is going to look good playing with Drew Brees.

Just like NE never had a stud RB with Brady, but everyone they plugged in did just fine.


I'm not sure Tennessee is the best example either considering how their running game performed in the Playoffs.
Post #: 670
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:21:26 PM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 39278
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

My point being, Super Bowls are no longer won with great rushing attacks. Haven't been for a long time. So if you have a good back, he could be tremendous trade bait.

You contradicted yourself in one post.

SB teams don't need great RBs but teams hoping to build a SB team(which is the goal of all teams) should trade for a RB.


No contradiction. He's hoping one of the bad teams w/o a RB will overvalue the position:

"Like I said earlier, some still think running back is important."

Like a SB winning Coach and GM in New Orleans and a well respected coach in Tennessee.


I don't see him mentioning those teams, maybe I can't find the post you're referring to?

All I see is:

quote:

The Jets, Texans, Falcons and Eagles all need a running back. That gets you a high pick for one of the top quarterbacks. You live for one more year with Cousins and then dump him.


My point was:

Are you going to take advice on building a team from a SB winning Coach or a guy who trolls Viking fans when the team struggles?


Any RB is going to look good playing with Drew Brees.

Just like NE never had a stud RB with Brady, but everyone they plugged in did just fine.


You still have to be able to run the ball effectively. Without a running attack the Defense pins its ears back and comes full bore after the QB on every play.

Now, I'm not saying you next the next Walter Payton or Barry Sanders to do this.

No, I would say you want a back that can contribute in the passing game as well as run the ball well, like Marshall Faulk or Thurman Thomas.

Dalvin Cook does that.

But the Vikings rely to heavily on him....and when he goes down (which he does every season) it puts a strain on the offense.

Anyway. Running Backs are still important and with everyone trying to pass pass pass, defenses are built to stop the pass. so Maybe running the ball isn't such a bad idea....

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”
Post #: 671
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:32:53 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I might do a research project at some point - if I have time, which I def do not at this point. The SB ran through NE for a long time. It will through KC for as long as Mahomes stays healthy. A good rushing attack is supposed to keep the opponents high scoring offense off the field. Has that been the case vs Mahomes so far? Is that the way to beat him? Shouldn't take long to look up all the losses and break down the rushing game.

I think to the first time the Bills played Mahomes. They dared KC to beat them with the run, and so KC did. Rushing for over 200 yards. I remember NE having very effective running games when they needed to.

While it is a passing game - more now than ever before, a good defense & scheme can take an element away from an offense. Super bowl offenses are able to adjust and win however needed. That doesn't mean I'm ok with the Cook contract. I thought and think it was stupid.


The problem is you don't know if the opponent built up a lead passing on key downs, etc then ran out the clock in the 4th quarter. An extra 50, 75, or more yards can skew things to make it look like rushing won the game.

I used to try and make that point with a poster who left. I think Todd M paid him a vist. Seemed later Todd was peeved because the guy went and took a nap while Todd was visiting.
Post #: 672
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:33:44 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline 		No one is saying you shouldn't run the ball or that its not important.

Just pushing back on spending premium picks and/or money on RBs.

The better you can throw the ball, the better your running game will be.
Post #: 673
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:35:45 PM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline 		Trading Cook however is not an option due to the dead cap hit.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 674
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/5/2021 3:38:26 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28600
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Trading Cook however is not an option due to the dead cap hit.


It would be bold though. Well, to most of us.
Post #: 675
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode