RE: General Vikes Talk

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk

Page: << < prev 44 45 [46] 47 48 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/7/2021 5:01:33 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 1126

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/7/2021 5:17:14 PM

Mark Anderson

Posts: 12176
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

I know we have a lot of other needs but I would really like to see us get LB Parsons from Penn State. A blitzer who can finish.

We also need to shore up secondary before we start sending the house more often.

Post #: 1127

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/7/2021 5:27:17 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

I know we have a lot of other needs but I would really like to see us get LB Parsons from Penn State. A blitzer who can finish.

We also need to shore up secondary before we start sending the house more often.

It’s six of one and a half-dozen of the other. A stellar pass rush allows the secondary to get by with less talent. We have hunter already. Why do we need excellence on the back end too?

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 1128

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/7/2021 5:38:27 PM

Mark Anderson

Posts: 12176
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

I know we have a lot of other needs but I would really like to see us get LB Parsons from Penn State. A blitzer who can finish.

We also need to shore up secondary before we start sending the house more often.

It’s six of one and a half-dozen of the other. A stellar pass rush allows the secondary to get by with less talent. We have hunter already. Why do we need excellence on the back end too?

I'm saying we can't be putting 2019 Rhodes or 2020 Jones, Tankersley, Fields on the field and be where we want to be.

Ball has been out quickly to a toasted CB too often the last couple years. Pass rush can't even get there.

Dantzler and Gladney are a good start but we need Hughes or a FA vet or draft pick to solidify DBs.

Post #: 1129

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/7/2021 11:18:59 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Another article with Cousins going to SF, this one has the Vikings giving a 4th rounder, gaining Garrapollo and a 2nd rounder:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nfl-trade-machine-this-kirk-cousins-jimmy-garoppolo-deal-could-actually-work/ar-BB1ekTJx?
ocid=st

Then you send Garrapollo to NE for a 1st rounder.

Then you either trade up for a top 10 QB selection, or trade for Watson.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!

Post #: 1130

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 12:28:51 AM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

And this also makes sense, because NE is very much interested in Garrapollo:

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/jimmy-garoppolo-remains-patriots-top-qb-target-for-2021-as-49ers-consider-upgrade-per-report/

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!

Post #: 1131

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 9:21:37 AM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

I know we have a lot of other needs but I would really like to see us get LB Parsons from Penn State. A blitzer who can finish.

We also need to shore up secondary before we start sending the house more often.

It’s six of one and a half-dozen of the other. A stellar pass rush allows the secondary to get by with less talent. We have hunter already. Why do we need excellence on the back end too?

I'm saying we can't be putting 2019 Rhodes or 2020 Jones, Tankersley, Fields on the field and be where we want to be.

Ball has been out quickly to a toasted CB too often the last couple years. Pass rush can't even get there.

Dantzler and Gladney are a good start but we need Hughes or a FA vet or draft pick to solidify DBs.

Are you trying to say that defense starts at the corners?

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 1132

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 9:35:45 AM

ronhextall

Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Another article with Cousins going to SF, this one has the Vikings giving a 4th rounder, gaining Garrapollo and a 2nd rounder:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nfl-trade-machine-this-kirk-cousins-jimmy-garoppolo-deal-could-actually-work/ar-BB1ekTJx?
ocid=st

Then you send Garrapollo to NE for a 1st rounder.

Then you either trade up for a top 10 QB selection, or trade for Watson.

I wish the dominos would start to fall on the QB merry-go-round. The wild speculation is getting ridiculous.

Watson is the big holdup IMO. If Watson truly refuses to play for Houston and they don't move him before the draft the Texans will be the laughing stock of the league.

Post #: 1133

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 10:04:08 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

Zone Coverage: Only Six Players Remain from the Minnesota Miracle Roster by Sam Ekstrom

WHO’S STILL UNDER CONTRACT: WR Adam Thielen, T Riley Reiff, LB Anthony Barr, LB Eric Kendricks, DE Danielle Hunter, S Harrison Smith

The turnover from our 2017 roster came as a surprise to me.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 1134

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 11:47:53 AM

Mark Anderson

Posts: 12176
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

I know we have a lot of other needs but I would really like to see us get LB Parsons from Penn State. A blitzer who can finish.

We also need to shore up secondary before we start sending the house more often.

It’s six of one and a half-dozen of the other. A stellar pass rush allows the secondary to get by with less talent. We have hunter already. Why do we need excellence on the back end too?

I'm saying we can't be putting 2019 Rhodes or 2020 Jones, Tankersley, Fields on the field and be where we want to be.

Ball has been out quickly to a toasted CB too often the last couple years. Pass rush can't even get there.

Dantzler and Gladney are a good start but we need Hughes or a FA vet or draft pick to solidify DBs.

Are you trying to say that defense starts at the corners?

Competent corners

Post #: 1135

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 12:01:29 PM

Jeff Jesser

Posts: 19462
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline

Since he's taken over, RS has drafted 5 first round players in the secondary and hired a supposed "defensive back guru". Seems like a whole lot of resources for someone who's specialty was getting the most out of little at the position.

Post #: 1136

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 12:12:08 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77939
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Since he's taken over, RS has drafted 5 first round players in the secondary and hired a supposed "defensive back guru". Seems like a whole lot of resources for someone who's specialty was getting the most out of little at the position.

And "Franchised" a safety last season.

Post #: 1137

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 12:57:34 PM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline

Here’s the deal: Wilson is flashier and arguably more athletic than teammate Anthony Barr. He is a pretty good pass rusher and an astute pass-coverage linebacker.

But he does not defend the run well – at all.

His 2020 Pro Football Focus against-the-run grade was 38.3. That is atrocious. In 2019 (his last full season of production), Anthony Barr posted a run-defense PFF grade almost double that of Wilson. No matter how one spins it or rationalizes Wilson’s performance, he is an incomplete NFL defender when compared to Barr.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 1138

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 1:56:13 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

Well yeah. That’s why Wilson made $3 million to Barr’s $15 million.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 1139

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 1:58:02 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

Or in 2019, $600,000 vs $5.6 million.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 1140

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 2:06:43 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77939
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Here’s the deal: Wilson is flashier and arguably more athletic than teammate Anthony Barr. He is a pretty good pass rusher and an astute pass-coverage linebacker.

But he does not defend the run well – at all.

His 2020 Pro Football Focus against-the-run grade was 38.3. That is atrocious. In 2019 (his last full season of production), Anthony Barr posted a run-defense PFF grade almost double that of Wilson. No matter how one spins it or rationalizes Wilson’s performance, he is an incomplete NFL defender when compared to Barr.

So replace Barr with a run stuffing LBer and save a fortune.

Post #: 1141

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 2:21:28 PM

Steve Lentz

Posts: 36196
Joined: 7/19/2007
From: Omaha
Status: offline

Parsons is a beast. Would love to see him in Purple as I expect to see him as a very good LB.

It's not as a desperate need as OL though. It's been a lot of years now I've been pleading for OL, but once the draft starts there always seems to sexier picks. We absolutely need to seriously upgrade the Ol.

_____________________________

" I believe empathy is the most essential quality of civilization"

Post #: 1142

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 2:22:55 PM

kevinemmer

Posts: 4659
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Bozeman, MT
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

Danielle Hunter is 'liking' tweets that mention him being traded. Back when Ngakowe was traded there was rumors that it was TWO star D-linemen that weren't happy. This would be a disaster to lose him unless we can get two first round picks or better.

Sweeten up his deal with some more money upfront(if neck checks out)Add a year if need be.
Get him into Top 10 range for DE.
Lower his cap number(this year) a little while we are at it.

If he declines, we have him under contract for 3 more years. Sit out and throw away 40M if he wants.

The problem is that you don't want anything less than his 100% best. So good will is needed here and well deserved for Hunter.

The good will is sweetening his deal.

I can't think of a time where Hunter wasn't praised by the FO and coaching staff.

Not saying this is the case for Hunter but a lot of the NFL players want the NBA deal where you can basically force your way unto any team you want(to a certain extent).

They(NFL players) just approved a new Labor Deal so the majority basically got what they wanted.

All of this assumes money is the issue. It might not be.

You have said that twice now.

What do you think the problem is? What is another reason?

I don’t think he likes the way we get conservative and sit on leads. I think he wants to play in a more aggressive scheme. I think he’s frustrated that we only rush four on third down so often. He’s seen us get smoked in the big games too often.

I know we have a lot of other needs but I would really like to see us get LB Parsons from Penn State. A blitzer who can finish.

We also need to shore up secondary before we start sending the house more often.

Given Hunter's neck uncertainty, his displeasure with Purple, and our Cap issues,
start shopping him.

Miami would be great match for their #3 overall, #36 overall, and next year's #1.

Take Wilson at #3
Or Lance (my next choice)
Or Fields

Edge Rusher like Parsons at #14
Best Int O-line at #36

Fire Zimmer/Spiels and start winning!!

Post #: 1143

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 5:34:04 PM

Bruce Johnson

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline

I could be proven wrong, but with Hunter's neck situation we are not going to get two number ones for him. We will be selling low, right now.

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?

Post #: 1144

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 6:16:56 PM

kevinemmer

Posts: 4659
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Bozeman, MT
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

I could be proven wrong, but with Hunter's neck situation we are not going to get two number ones for him. We will be selling low, right now.

Agree actually.

#3 and #36 this year and I jump all over it.

Post #: 1145

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 6:38:25 PM

Bruce Johnson

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline

"Vikings guards produced a cumulative overall grade of 50.6 to go with an abysmally low 37.9 pass-blocking grade"

would love to have a small amount of cap space to go towards a guard, maybe something around 2.5 million? oh, yeah that's right...

(Spencer Thompson on Twitter)

_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?

Post #: 1146

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/8/2021 8:18:22 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Probably have to get a FA Guard as the current OL coach consistently has the Guards rated low at pass blocking, unless the OL coach is replaced.

Better playcalling and unpredictability could also help pass blocking.

And then a QB with a quick, accurate release, and mobility.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!

Post #: 1147

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/9/2021 6:00:24 PM

twinsfan

Posts: 63630
Joined: 12/21/2009
Status: offline

Released our kicker and nobody cares?

_____________________________

“We are an unserious nation that's in serious $hit.”

-Me

Post #: 1148

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/9/2021 8:12:50 PM

David F.

Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: twinsfan

Released our kicker and nobody cares?

Kickers and offensive coordinators come and go mighty quick in these parts.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!

Post #: 1149

RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/9/2021 8:49:51 PM

Pager

Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: twinsfan

Released our kicker and nobody cares?

Kickers and offensive coordinators come and go mighty quick in these parts.