Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  143 144 [145] 146 147   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 7:18:29 AM   
TJSweens


Posts: 45006
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Viking Rich

Another good nugget for O'Connell:

NFL Teams in 2021 ran the 11 personnel package (1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR) on average at 61%.
The 2 highest teams?

1. LA Rams - 85%
2. Bengals - 77%

28. Vikings - 47%

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/nfl-stats/personnel-groupings/offense/offensive-personnel-grouping-frequency-2021/

Compare that to Jim Harbaugh and his run heavy offenses.

_____________________________

"The eternal fate of the noble and enlightened: to be brutally crushed by the armed and dumb."
Post #: 3601
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 8:53:04 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40539
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
I like the idea of swapping QB's with Cleveland.

A player for player swap with us getting out of 35 of that 45 million. No draft compensation from us.

Hold onto Baker for a bit. Draft a QB. Pick the most advantageous time to move Baker.
Post #: 3602
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 9:15:05 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12144
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TJSweens

quote:

ORIGINAL: Viking Rich

Another good nugget for O'Connell:

NFL Teams in 2021 ran the 11 personnel package (1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR) on average at 61%.
The 2 highest teams?

1. LA Rams - 85%
2. Bengals - 77%

28. Vikings - 47%

https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/nfl-stats/personnel-groupings/offense/offensive-personnel-grouping-frequency-2021/

Compare that to Jim Harbaugh and his run heavy offenses.

Yep. How many years did it take him bring in some athletes and start throwing the ball? And Georgia still made them look like plodders.
Post #: 3603
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 1:12:08 PM   
Dana Turner


Posts: 1958
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
With KOC taking the job at Minnesota, I think that means that Cousins is staying in place. I could certainly be wrong, but KOC has history with Cousins and it can be said that Stafford and Cousins are fairly similar types of QB's. Both have solid arm talent, with accuracy and ball placement a premium and both also throw a good ball downfield. Both also have similar poor traits, not being mobile, pocket awareness and the mantra of not being able to put the team on your shoulders and take them to victory. I get people being weary of Cousins, he's an odd dude, kindoff a nerd type, so uncomfortable to get behind. He's not the QB who everybody loves and fawns over, but I do believe he can take a team to the championship. If you add one more solid piece, possible two (Bradbury) to the offensive line, possibly another tall receiver, and this offense is pretty formidable, now that it will be opened up. I say extend Cousins, fix the salary cap so that we can do a couple other FA moves, and get this defense some help in the draft.

I know many would like to see a fresh start in the QB room, hell, I'm one of them, but if I'm reading the tea leaves, I believe it's saying get used to Cousins and truth be told, that's not the worst thing that can happen this off season!
Post #: 3604
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 1:20:07 PM   
Jeff Allen

 

Posts: 8660
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Twin Cities
Status: offline
I like the idea of trading Cousins and some others, tank in 2022, and then build for 2023. Need to find the QB either in this year's draft or next year.
Post #: 3605
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 1:23:32 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13943
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

With KOC taking the job at Minnesota, I think that means that Cousins is staying in place.

I agree, and at this point in time, all I care about is NOT giving him an extension to rework his contract and lower the cap hit, unless it’s a sign and trade.

And not for Deshaun Watson…..( I’m looking at you, Marty)..

If we do a sign and trade.. I’d prefer draft picks, or any QB that the “ still not in place” coaching staff feels would be a good fit for the offensive philosophy.

I’m ok with cousins for next season, and if a new regime can get him to the next level of winning, like in prime time and in playoff situations..then resign him..

But his history, Cousin’s history, seems to indicate he has reached his plateau.

< Message edited by Daniel Lee Young -- 2/6/2022 1:25:06 PM >


_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3606
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 1:57:49 PM   
BosViking


Posts: 30
Joined: 1/21/2022
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

With KOC taking the job at Minnesota, I think that means that Cousins is staying in place.

I agree, and at this point in time, all I care about is NOT giving him an extension to rework his contract and lower the cap hit, unless it’s a sign and trade.

And not for Deshaun Watson…..( I’m looking at you, Marty)..

If we do a sign and trade.. I’d prefer draft picks, or any QB that the “ still not in place” coaching staff feels would be a good fit for the offensive philosophy.

I’m ok with cousins for next season, and if a new regime can get him to the next level of winning, like in prime time and in playoff situations..then resign him..

But his history, Cousin’s history, seems to indicate he has reached his plateau.


I'm at this point too. Anything but an extension for Kirk. Meaning, this upcoming season (if not sooner via trade) will be the last season he will be a Viking.

We need to move on. We chose the right thing in firing Rick and Mike, now do the right thing and move on from Kirk. Start over.
Post #: 3607
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:15:32 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

I like the idea of trading Cousins and some others, tank in 2022, and then build for 2023. Need to find the QB either in this year's draft or next year.

I can't respect anyone associated with a tank effort - that must be an oxymoron.
Post #: 3608
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:18:44 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

With KOC taking the job at Minnesota, I think that means that Cousins is staying in place. I could certainly be wrong, but KOC has history with Cousins and it can be said that Stafford and Cousins are fairly similar types of QB's. Both have solid arm talent, with accuracy and ball placement a premium and both also throw a good ball downfield. Both also have similar poor traits, not being mobile, pocket awareness and the mantra of not being able to put the team on your shoulders and take them to victory. I get people being weary of Cousins, he's an odd dude, kindoff a nerd type, so uncomfortable to get behind. He's not the QB who everybody loves and fawns over, but I do believe he can take a team to the championship. If you add one more solid piece, possible two (Bradbury) to the offensive line, possibly another tall receiver, and this offense is pretty formidable, now that it will be opened up. I say extend Cousins, fix the salary cap so that we can do a couple other FA moves, and get this defense some help in the draft.

I know many would like to see a fresh start in the QB room, hell, I'm one of them, but if I'm reading the tea leaves, I believe it's saying get used to Cousins and truth be told, that's not the worst thing that can happen this off season!

I believe that's about as perfect a description as I've ever seen. I always believed it was his look - it is, nerdy
Post #: 3609
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:27:59 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9524
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

With KOC taking the job at Minnesota, I think that means that Cousins is staying in place. I could certainly be wrong, but KOC has history with Cousins and it can be said that Stafford and Cousins are fairly similar types of QB's. Both have solid arm talent, with accuracy and ball placement a premium and both also throw a good ball downfield. Both also have similar poor traits, not being mobile, pocket awareness and the mantra of not being able to put the team on your shoulders and take them to victory. I get people being weary of Cousins, he's an odd dude, kindoff a nerd type, so uncomfortable to get behind. He's not the QB who everybody loves and fawns over, but I do believe he can take a team to the championship. If you add one more solid piece, possible two (Bradbury) to the offensive line, possibly another tall receiver, and this offense is pretty formidable, now that it will be opened up. I say extend Cousins, fix the salary cap so that we can do a couple other FA moves, and get this defense some help in the draft.

I know many would like to see a fresh start in the QB room, hell, I'm one of them, but if I'm reading the tea leaves, I believe it's saying get used to Cousins and truth be told, that's not the worst thing that can happen this off season!

I believe that's about as perfect a description as I've ever seen. I always believed it was his look - it is, nerdy



regarding vaccinations; i'm pro-choice...but i wouldn't pay that much money to a guy with his level of talent at quarterback if he refused to be vaccinated...for me, it's that simple of a business decision....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 3610
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:37:10 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9524
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

I like the idea of swapping QB's with Cleveland.

A player for player swap with us getting out of 35 of that 45 million. No draft compensation from us.

Hold onto Baker for a bit. Draft a QB. Pick the most advantageous time to move Baker.


zulgad likes that trade, too...but he sees it as a 'stafford' trade - two 1st round picks, one for cousins, one for taking baker....

i'd like it, but i'd try to trade baker after the making the cousins deal....

if we can't get a QB that we like with our 1st rounder, do the #12 for a '22/2nd and '23/1st trade...hoard '23 picks for a big trade in 2023....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 3611
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:52:01 PM   
marty


Posts: 13038
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
The one season O'Connell worked with KC, was KC's worst year. O'Connell has worked with Brady and other QBs, he knows how KC can be error prone.

The difference with Stafford is, the Rams saw him as a final piece. The Vikings aren't that close. After you look at what Dana mentioned for offense, then there all the holes on defense. And that is with a lot less cap money to work with.

I think KC is as good as gone.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3612
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:53:39 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33758
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dana Turner

With KOC taking the job at Minnesota, I think that means that Cousins is staying in place. I could certainly be wrong, but KOC has history with Cousins and it can be said that Stafford and Cousins are fairly similar types of QB's. Both have solid arm talent, with accuracy and ball placement a premium and both also throw a good ball downfield. Both also have similar poor traits, not being mobile, pocket awareness and the mantra of not being able to put the team on your shoulders and take them to victory. I get people being weary of Cousins, he's an odd dude, kindoff a nerd type, so uncomfortable to get behind. He's not the QB who everybody loves and fawns over, but I do believe he can take a team to the championship. If you add one more solid piece, possible two (Bradbury) to the offensive line, possibly another tall receiver, and this offense is pretty formidable, now that it will be opened up. I say extend Cousins, fix the salary cap so that we can do a couple other FA moves, and get this defense some help in the draft.

I know many would like to see a fresh start in the QB room, hell, I'm one of them, but if I'm reading the tea leaves, I believe it's saying get used to Cousins and truth be told, that's not the worst thing that can happen this off season!

I believe that's about as perfect a description as I've ever seen. I always believed it was his look - it is, nerdy

Him being nerdy makes it all that much easier for me to get behind him. I prefer nerd to jock every time.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 3613
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 2:55:32 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33758
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

I like the idea of trading Cousins and some others, tank in 2022, and then build for 2023. Need to find the QB either in this year's draft or next year.

I can't respect anyone associated with a tank effort - that must be an oxymoron.

Agreed. I will never support a tank.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 3614
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 3:57:15 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

The one season O'Connell worked with KC, was KC's worst year. O'Connell has worked with Brady and other QBs, he knows how KC can be error prone.

The difference with Stafford is, the Rams saw him as a final piece. The Vikings aren't that close. After you look at what Dana mentioned for offense, then there all the holes on defense. And that is with a lot less cap money to work with.

I think KC is as good as gone.

I don't think that's true. I've seen people argue this statement with stats and personal that are die hard fans of Wash and they don't agree with you.
Post #: 3615
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 4:02:52 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

The one season O'Connell worked with KC, was KC's worst year. O'Connell has worked with Brady and other QBs, he knows how KC can be error prone.

The difference with Stafford is, the Rams saw him as a final piece. The Vikings aren't that close. After you look at what Dana mentioned for offense, then there all the holes on defense. And that is with a lot less cap money to work with.

I think KC is as good as gone.

I don't think that's true. I've seen people argue this statement with stats and personal that are die hard fans of Wash and they don't agree with you.

Either way, it don't matter. He'll be here and he'll be good and you'll all say, I was wrong ... choke cough cough
Post #: 3616
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 7:48:49 PM   
Jeff Allen

 

Posts: 8660
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Twin Cities
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

I like the idea of trading Cousins and some others, tank in 2022, and then build for 2023. Need to find the QB either in this year's draft or next year.

I can't respect anyone associated with a tank effort - that must be an oxymoron.

Agreed. I will never support a tank.


Not a purposeful tank...but if they get rid of Cousins and a couple other high priced contracts they will not be good. Everyone obviously will do their best, bet they will end up 5-12 with a nice draft pick...building for 2023. Cincinnati did this a few years ago and are now in the Super Bowl.
Post #: 3617
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 7:49:34 PM   
Jeff Allen

 

Posts: 8660
Joined: 7/25/2007
From: Twin Cities
Status: offline
The other option is to extend Cousins. Seems pointless to just let him play in 2022 with no future contract so the team can go 8-9 again.
Post #: 3618
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 8:40:48 PM   
marty


Posts: 13038
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
The year Cousins worked with O'Connell, he did still have 27 TDs, but had the most INTs of his career at 13, and worst QB rating:

"With 27 touchdowns and 4,093 yards passing in 2017, Cousins put up the type of season some fans defend on Twitter. But he also posted career lows as a starter in completion percentage (64.3%), quarterback rating (93.9), and QBR (56.0). Cousins also finished 29th in average depth of target (8.2 yards) and 20th in Pro Football Focus grade."

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 3619
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/6/2022 10:33:48 PM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

The other option is to extend Cousins. Seems pointless to just let him play in 2022 with no future contract so the team can go 8-9 again.

If you mean he wouldn't give a 100% I don't see that as being his way. A lot of athletes yes, not Cousins.
Post #: 3620
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/7/2022 7:54:17 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27378
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ricky J

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Allen

I like the idea of trading Cousins and some others, tank in 2022, and then build for 2023. Need to find the QB either in this year's draft or next year.

I can't respect anyone associated with a tank effort - that must be an oxymoron.

Agreed. I will never support a tank.


Miami coach wouldn't tank (even thought the owner was going to pay him to tank) and they traded away everything of value for the highest value; they became relevant by the next season.

Whatever the asset is if you can get the highest value for it you do it...New England has done it for years.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 2/7/2022 8:09:03 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3621
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/7/2022 8:27:03 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27378
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
Get ready for a bunch of posters to cry:

Minnesota Vikings
·
See more
The Viking Age
@TheVikingAge
·
13h
ESPN’s Adam Schefter believes the #Vikings could extend Kirk Cousins this offseason

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 3622
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/7/2022 9:07:30 AM   
Todd M

 

Posts: 40539
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
Breaking news..

Of course they could...

< Message edited by Todd M -- 2/7/2022 9:20:48 AM >
Post #: 3623
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/7/2022 9:27:16 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13943
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

Breaking news..

Of course they could...

Followed.. by an immediate trade for a bag of eyeballs that can scan the field more than 3 yards past the LOS..

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3624
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/7/2022 9:33:21 AM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13943
Status: offline
The only obvious way to lessen his ridiculous cap hit is a re-nogotiated contract..

But if you had a GUARANTEED 45 million dollars… on top of the millions you have a.ready banked. What would you do?

Does Cusins strike you as a “ what’s best for the team” guy?

Mr. Throw it into the stands or out of the endzone in crunch time is not what I call a team friendly, smart, QB.

Adequate.

Impressive?
No.

He likes KOC..

big deal..

Rework that boat anchor contract and start shopping him around..

JMO

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 3625
Page:   <<   < prev  143 144 [145] 146 147   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  143 144 [145] 146 147   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode