Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  200 201 [202] 203 204   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:46:08 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Weird...Giants most likely done in a week also. So would that make your philosphy any better?


Yes, on one hand the Giants have what is likely an ascending QB that they have the option to keep or have walk. On the other, we have a descending QB who the football world is mocking for an absolutely stupid decision to end the season to whom we are stuck with.

We'll see how the Giants do. Jones, Barkley and Lawrence about to be paid.
Post #: 5026
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:46:21 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
By the way Phil, this past offseason you continually praised Kwesi for the cap he created (in reality just kicked down the road), his wonderful free agent signings on defense, and his high draft picks on defense. To the point where is was like you were Kwesi's mentee or agent.

Just who from those acquisitions, let alone the entire defense, is a must-keep?
Post #: 5027
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:48:08 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/17/2023 11:50:20 AM >
Post #: 5028
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:49:04 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


and... if you want you can rent under a franchise tag, or trade under franchise tag etc....

thats what i would have done with Flacco after the super bowl


or if you let him leave with a big contract, you may get 3rd round draft compensation

Are the Giants like 3 deep at QB?

They need to sign him and it will cost them a pretty penny. Franchise tag kills your cap. It all counts. no signing bonus to spread out.
Post #: 5029
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:52:10 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
By the way Phil, this past offseason you continually praised Kwesi for the cap he created (in reality just kicked down the road), his wonderful free agent signings on defense, and his high draft picks on defense. To the point where is was like you were Kwesi's mentee or agent.
Just who from those acquisitions, let alone the entire defense, is a must-keep?


Booth, Cine, and the LB still have promise yet. The Gopher DLineman played decent.

I think we have been down this road before on who you eventually thought we should draft (Davis, Hamilton who was gone already). The kicking down the road was the 28 million dead cap created by the last regime. Harry, Thielen, Cook were also before him.

I think you are ok with trading Watts and Dozier for Tonga and Shelley?
Do you want him gone?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5030
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:53:35 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


and... if you want you can rent under a franchise tag, or trade under franchise tag etc....

thats what i would have done with Flacco after the super bowl


or if you let him leave with a big contract, you may get 3rd round draft compensation

Are the Giants like 3 deep at QB?

They need to sign him and it will cost them a pretty penny. Franchise tag kills your cap. It all counts. no signing bonus to spread out.


yes, it does, they have to pay the piper for not using the 5th year option

but i would rather see one more year, than a long term mistake (ie Flacco)


I would not care if I missed out on some FAs this year to be sure I have a QBOTF

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 5031
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:54:10 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.
Kelce signed a 4/57 in 2020. First year cap was 11 million.

For 2023 they are doable.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 1/17/2023 11:56:54 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5032
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:56:23 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
By the way Phil, this past offseason you continually praised Kwesi for the cap he created (in reality just kicked down the road), his wonderful free agent signings on defense, and his high draft picks on defense. To the point where is was like you were Kwesi's mentee or agent.
Just who from those acquisitions, let alone the entire defense, is a must-keep?


Booth, Cine, and the LB still have promise yet. The Gopher DLineman played decent.

I think we have been down this road before on who you eventually thought we should draft (Davis, Hamilton who was gone already). The kicking down the road was the 28 million dead cap created by the last regime. Harry, Thielen, Cook were also before him.

I think you are ok with trading Watts and Dozier for Tonga and Shelley?
Do you want him gone?


Never wanted Hamilton. I like the in-season low end trades so far. Clearly enough rehashing of last offseason.
Post #: 5033
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:58:04 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


and... if you want you can rent under a franchise tag, or trade under franchise tag etc....

thats what i would have done with Flacco after the super bowl


or if you let him leave with a big contract, you may get 3rd round draft compensation

Are the Giants like 3 deep at QB?

They need to sign him and it will cost them a pretty penny. Franchise tag kills your cap. It all counts. no signing bonus to spread out.

Barkley i
yes, it does, they have to pay the piper for not using the 5th year option

but i would rather see one more year, than a long term mistake (ie Flacco)


I would not care if I missed out on some FAs this year to be sure I have a QBOTF

Not having 5th year really hurts because I think Barkley is a FA also.
Post #: 5034
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 11:58:28 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.

For 2023 they are doable.


If generational JJ and TJ are all that, there won't be any 'outs'... they will play out the full contract or at least have it worked so they get every penny.
Post #: 5035
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:00:25 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.
Kelce signed a 4/57 in 2020. First year cap was 11 million.

For 2023 they are doable.


You're a big credit card fan aren't you?

What do you do in 1 or 2 years when you're out of easy to dump big contracts and all the money you've pushed ahead is now a balloon payment?

Restructure everyone again?

You maximize today and say screw the future if you're a legit SB contender. Not when you're in a "soft rebuild".
Post #: 5036
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:02:10 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.
Kelce signed a 4/57 in 2020. First year cap was 11 million.

For 2023 they are doable.


You're a big credit card fan aren't you?

What do you do in 1 or 2 years when you're out of easy to dump big contracts and all the money you've pushed ahead is now a balloon payment?

Restructure everyone again?

You maximize today and say screw the future if you're a legit SB contender. Not when you're in a "soft rebuild".


You give Dalvins, Thielens, and Harry's money to TJ and JJeff in 2024 and structure it that way.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5037
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:04:40 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.
Kelce signed a 4/57 in 2020. First year cap was 11 million.

For 2023 they are doable.


You're a big credit card fan aren't you?

What do you do in 1 or 2 years when you're out of easy to dump big contracts and all the money you've pushed ahead is now a balloon payment?

Restructure everyone again?

You maximize today and say screw the future if you're a legit SB contender. Not when you're in a "soft rebuild".


You give Dalvins, Thielens, and Harry's money to TJ and JJeff in 2024 and structure it that way.


So we burn our cut player savings on existing players?

How are we adding talent?
Post #: 5038
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:08:43 PM   
The Happy Norseman

 

Posts: 758
Joined: 12/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes
These people are pupae and KC is their fuzzy cocoon.


KC won us over the year. The defense side is a bigger concern. If you can't fix it you may as well blow it up. Expectations were for a top 10 offense and a defense being 15-20 and improving as season went on....second part never happened.

For me even with the last checkdown by the KC the defense was the deciding factor. They just couldn't stop anything and should have given up another TD to Slayton.

Sounds like they postponed the KOC end of year news conference until tomorrow.....some speculating a new DC already.



that is exactly what we needed to happen to be a true contender, and you are exactly right on the assessment


they tried their 'last dance'.....and came up short

now we pay the piper for a one year late rebuild


I enjoyed the year, so I cant be too mad about going for the last dance...it worked WAY more than i expected, but I am ready to see what Kwesi can do going forward (first draft was sketchy, but some pretty nice additions to build from)


The Vikings are actually set up to allow Kwesi to continue his "competitive rebuild" while remaining competitive next year. On offensive, all the team needs is a Center and a WR to replace Theilen - who fell off a cliff this year. However, our D is slow and old and needs to get blown up. The good news is that's where we can save the most cap money. And regardless of who they replace the aging vets with (H Smith, Z Smith, Kendricks, Hicks, Peterson), they can't be any worse than this year's disaster of a defense. Assuming that we get a new D coordinator of course. Kwesi is going to get the chance to really earn his salary.

_____________________________

If the Cubs can win the World Series...
Post #: 5039
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:13:23 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.
Kelce signed a 4/57 in 2020. First year cap was 11 million.

For 2023 they are doable.


You're a big credit card fan aren't you?

What do you do in 1 or 2 years when you're out of easy to dump big contracts and all the money you've pushed ahead is now a balloon payment?

Restructure everyone again?

You maximize today and say screw the future if you're a legit SB contender. Not when you're in a "soft rebuild".


You give Dalvins, Thielens, and Harry's money to TJ and JJeff in 2024 and structure it that way.


So we burn our cut player savings on existing players?

How are we adding talent?

TJ's will be a cap savings. 9M to maybe 5 or 6M

JJ will have to be at least doubled. 4M to 8 or 10.

Most of these big contracts start out with minimum base salary 1st year.

What hurts is we should have an extra 1st rounder this year instead of a bunch of question marks(Cine, Booth, Ingram}

< Message edited by Mark Anderson -- 1/17/2023 12:14:50 PM >
Post #: 5040
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:19:21 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
The Vikings are actually set up to allow Kwesi to continue his "competitive rebuild" while remaining competitive next year.

Barring a weird string of good fortune with future acquisitions, there is no way we are competitive next year. And "remaining competitive" is a bit misleading because of all the well-mentioned lucky things that happened this year.

"Competitive rebuild" is some BS term Zygi may have conjured up. Especially when the D needs an outright rebuild with, yet again, less than average draft assets and starting with a cap deficit.

Kwesi needs to put on his big boy pants and pull off the band-aids, pay the piper, whatever. If he is in fact doing Wilf's bidding, he should quit his job.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 1/17/2023 12:20:51 PM >
Post #: 5041
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:36:32 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12178
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

The Vikings are actually set up to allow Kwesi to continue his "competitive rebuild" while remaining competitive next year.

Barring a weird string of good fortune with future acquisitions, there is no way we are competitive next year. And "remaining competitive" is a bit misleading because of all the well-mentioned lucky things that happened this year.

"Competitive rebuild" is some BS term Zygi may have conjured up. Especially when the D needs an outright rebuild with, yet again, less than average draft assets and starting with a cap deficit.

Kwesi needs to put on his big boy pants and pull off the band-aids, pay the piper, whatever. If he is in fact doing Wilf's bidding, he should quit his job.

Most of the suggestions on here have been pulling off the band aids.

Cook, Harry, Kendricks, Z, Thielen, Hicks, Ham, Reed are on the chopping block. Offense basically stays in tact.

Spend 25-30M on some new defenders and maybe we can get 10-11 wins next year.

All of it for naught if we don't dive hard into QBOTF pool.
Post #: 5042
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:44:36 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28647
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

The Vikings are actually set up to allow Kwesi to continue his "competitive rebuild" while remaining competitive next year.

Barring a weird string of good fortune with future acquisitions, there is no way we are competitive next year. And "remaining competitive" is a bit misleading because of all the well-mentioned lucky things that happened this year.

"Competitive rebuild" is some BS term Zygi may have conjured up. Especially when the D needs an outright rebuild with, yet again, less than average draft assets and starting with a cap deficit.

Kwesi needs to put on his big boy pants and pull off the band-aids, pay the piper, whatever. If he is in fact doing Wilf's bidding, he should quit his job.

Most of the suggestions on here have been pulling off the band aids.

Cook, Harry, Kendricks, Z, Thielen, Hicks, Ham, Reed are on the chopping block. Offense basically stays in tact.

Spend 25-30M on some new defenders and maybe we can get 10-11 wins next year.

All of it for naught if we don't dive hard into QBOTF pool.


Hope it plays out like that, to include some QB move, although 10-11 wins to me is more of a hope than reasonable (although I see you said 'maybe').
Post #: 5043
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:44:45 PM   
The Happy Norseman

 

Posts: 758
Joined: 12/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

The Vikings are actually set up to allow Kwesi to continue his "competitive rebuild" while remaining competitive next year.

Barring a weird string of good fortune with future acquisitions, there is no way we are competitive next year. And "remaining competitive" is a bit misleading because of all the well-mentioned lucky things that happened this year.

"Competitive rebuild" is some BS term Zygi may have conjured up. Especially when the D needs an outright rebuild with, yet again, less than average draft assets and starting with a cap deficit.

Kwesi needs to put on his big boy pants and pull off the band-aids, pay the piper, whatever. If he is in fact doing Wilf's bidding, he should quit his job.

Most of the suggestions on here have been pulling off the band aids.

Cook, Harry, Kendricks, Z, Thielen, Hicks, Ham, Reed are on the chopping block. Offense basically stays in tact.

Spend 25-30M on some new defenders and maybe we can get 10-11 wins next year.

All of it for naught if we don't dive hard into QBOTF pool.


Exactly. The Vikings were the 7th ranked scoring offense. No reason to think they can't be just as good next year. Even a slight improvement on defense and the team will be competitive.

_____________________________

If the Cubs can win the World Series...
Post #: 5044
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:49:52 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

Kendricks is no longer our best.

I still think he's our best defender. That may not mean much when your defense is rated #31, but it is what it is. If he's not, who is?

Hunter is better. Hit Man is at least as good but also declining. Nobody on D was really good all year, but Kendricks is cooked. His PFF grades were bad everytime I heard them. He was one of the lowest graded D's in the Giants game. Even if you're right and he's the best we have, it's not good enough for what he makes.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 5045
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:52:48 PM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
Mackey and Judd just went through option of what they would/could do to open up space. Their easiest cuts were the 2 old, slow linebackers. They were "no-brainers". I agree.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 5046
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:54:48 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The Happy Norseman

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

The Vikings are actually set up to allow Kwesi to continue his "competitive rebuild" while remaining competitive next year.

Barring a weird string of good fortune with future acquisitions, there is no way we are competitive next year. And "remaining competitive" is a bit misleading because of all the well-mentioned lucky things that happened this year.

"Competitive rebuild" is some BS term Zygi may have conjured up. Especially when the D needs an outright rebuild with, yet again, less than average draft assets and starting with a cap deficit.

Kwesi needs to put on his big boy pants and pull off the band-aids, pay the piper, whatever. If he is in fact doing Wilf's bidding, he should quit his job.

Most of the suggestions on here have been pulling off the band aids.

Cook, Harry, Kendricks, Z, Thielen, Hicks, Ham, Reed are on the chopping block. Offense basically stays in tact.

Spend 25-30M on some new defenders and maybe we can get 10-11 wins next year.

All of it for naught if we don't dive hard into QBOTF pool.


Exactly. The Vikings were the 7th ranked scoring offense. No reason to think they can't be just as good next year. Even a slight improvement on defense and the team will be competitive.


Probably.

Cook is not who he once was, but if he and Mattison are gone, we're counting on totally unproven kids at RB.

I think KJ can step into the #2 role, but we need to see how he handles it full-time. Can Nailor be a #3?
Post #: 5047
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 12:56:38 PM   
fmaltes

 

Posts: 1013
Joined: 9/8/2008
Status: offline
I am not sure that firing Donatell will cure our defensive problems. First, we have one of the slowest defensive lineups in the league. Lack of speed is a general issue, but a really serious issue with the Fangio/Tomlin 3/4 scheme. Two of the players that could have helped add speed (Cine and Booth) were not available. Second, Mike Zimmer may have had issues, but he was an excellent defensive coordinator. Donatell inherited the same players that Zimmer was also not able to get to be an average defense. Two coaches both failing may suggest the primary problem are the players not the coach. Third, the Vikings did not have the right type of players for a 3/4 scheme. There was a bad fit of personnel. Even if we decide to get rid of Donatell, it might not be a bad idea to stick with the 3/4 but revamp the roster and also chose another coach that also uses the 3/4. This may not be a popular prediction on this website but I don't think they are going to fire Donatell.
Post #: 5048
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 1:01:27 PM   
fmaltes

 

Posts: 1013
Joined: 9/8/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ronhextall

Jones won 9 games with a much better defense.

Yup, he is better than Cousins who won 13

Makes sense to me.


I don't look at it as a simple Jones vs. Cousins comparison. I look at the big picture. Jones' cap hits over the last four years were (rounded) $5, $6, $7, and $8 million. Cousins' were $29, $21, $31, and $31. So in each of those years you don't just get Jones but you get Jones + whatever the extra $24 million buys you which could be a star corner AND a star guard.


Problem with Jones...NYG didn't think enough of him to guarantee his last year (before a full year of Daboll). So there is that.
So if you go hypothetical the first 3 years are struggles with decent WR on his contract.


See I don't see that as a problem. They got a serviceable QB that wasn't a homerun. That allowed them to cut bait and keep trying. The strange wrinkle was that he produced in his fourth year under a new coach. This is also most definitley NOT a problem. They can resign him if they think he's a homerun with Daboll or they can simply move on. They are in the drivers seat. What's Jones' market value? Too high - goodbye. Unexpetedly low? Sweet - sign him!


Right there is an example of a startling difference in logic, smarts, and common sense.

And the Giants have scraps for WR. Cousins has had Diggs, a prime Thielen, and now a couple of 'generational' talents.


Cap hit for 2022 Devante Adams this year. 2022 12 Million. 2023 14 Million
Cap hit for 2020 George Kittle 5/75 2020 5.8 million 2021 5.45 million

Fairly low cap hits. TJ set to make 9.5 million next year; JJ 4 million.


I see you left out Tyreke Hill and Travis Kelse.

Tyreek Hill signed a 4 year, $120,000,000 contract with the Miami Dolphins, including a $25,500,000 signing bonus, $72,200,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $30,000,000.

In 2023, Kelce will earn a base salary of $11,250,000, a roster bonus of $750,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000, while carrying a cap hit of $14,801,666 and a dead cap value of $7,655,000. Contract Notes: $20.75M guaranteed at signing (2020 salary + 2021 salary + 2021 roster bonus).


Tyreke had a 2022 cap of 6 million. All of those contracts are actually shorter with outs.
Kelce signed a 4/57 in 2020. First year cap was 11 million.

For 2023 they are doable.


You're a big credit card fan aren't you?

What do you do in 1 or 2 years when you're out of easy to dump big contracts and all the money you've pushed ahead is now a balloon payment?

Restructure everyone again?

You maximize today and say screw the future if you're a legit SB contender. Not when you're in a "soft rebuild".

The fact is it never "comes due" if you do it right. The current cap rules allow for this constant restructuring. It like a 1031 exchange in finance lol. The key is to have players accept it.
Post #: 5049
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/17/2023 1:03:02 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fmaltes

I am not sure that firing Donatell will cure our defensive problems. First, we have one of the slowest defensive lineups in the league. Lack of speed is a general issue, but a really serious issue with the Fangio/Tomlin 3/4 scheme. Two of the players that could have helped add speed (Cine and Booth) were not available. Second, Mike Zimmer may have had issues, but he was an excellent defensive coordinator. Donatell inherited the same players that Zimmer was also not able to get to be an average defense. Two coaches both failing may suggest the primary problem are the players not the coach. Third, the Vikings did not have the right type of players for a 3/4 scheme. There was a bad fit of personnel. Even if we decide to get rid of Donatell, it might not be a bad idea to stick with the 3/4 but revamp the roster and also chose another coach that also uses the 3/4. This may not be a popular prediction on this website but I don't think they are going to fire Donatell.


The problem I have with Donatell is that if you are slow or need more speed you put another safety or more CBs on the field. If I remember correctly the Giants had 7 DBs on the field at many times during the game.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5050
Page:   <<   < prev  200 201 [202] 203 204   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  200 201 [202] 203 204   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode