Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  207 208 [209] 210 211   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 10:33:32 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
Can't believe you guys are still trying to parse the final play. How about we agree on this? The Giants outplayed the Vikings on that play.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 5201
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 10:39:07 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28639
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Can't believe you guys are still trying to parse the final play. How about we agree on this? The Giants outplayed the Vikings on that play.


I liked seeing and discussing Warner's analysis. Is there news about something else? A brewing rumor?
Post #: 5202
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 10:47:48 AM   
Jeff Jesser


Posts: 19462
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Southern Cal
Status: offline
Lost in all this was my original intent (not that anyone cares). The D is/was so shitty it didn't matter if KC made a great or dumb play there. If we score and leave around a minute on the clock does anyone think they don't, easily, march down and get a FG attempt off?
Post #: 5203
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:01:39 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

Lost in all this was my original intent (not that anyone cares). The D is/was so shitty it didn't matter if KC made a great or dumb play there. If we score and leave around a minute on the clock does anyone think they don't, easily, march down and get a FG attempt off?


It didn't get lost. It's a given. Everyone knows it and everyone agrees on it. My guess to the reason the D isn't getting more talk is that the defense wasn't hand-picked and extended with a franchise-level contract with the idea that it was the last piece to a championship. That being said, I'd be more than happy to engage in a series of posts where we trash various members of the defense. I'd start with Patrick Peterson. On the play where Jones threw to their TE to the left where he walked in for a TD Patrick Peterson was the only defender on that side of the field. Even though he was the only defender on that side he still let the TE (the only pass-catcher who broke out to that side) release, catch, and walk to the endzone. PP just stood there and watched. Let's just say no to any more of Patrick Peterson. It was a good run. Let's move on.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5204
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:05:17 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
Ed Donatel's defense was often exploited by the opposing O coordinator allowing their WRs to be covered by our LB. Particularly vs the Giants there were plays where we had Hicks trying to cover their WR. These scenarios resulted in many big gains for NY. To be clear - these are not cases where 'our D is old and slow' these are cases where our coaches were outclassed. Let's just say no to any more of Ed Donatel. It wasn't even a good run. Let's move on.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5205
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:18:39 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

I got about 4 minutes into these highlights and already had enough to fill a post.

2:01: Saquon run left for a TD. Kendricks sprints the wrong direction from the get-go. Five Viking defenders miss a chance at a tackle. Looks like they are standing still.

2:36: Kendricks is covering Darius Slayton. Slayton catches the ball with Kendricks about 8 yards behind him. Slayton gains roughly 560 yards on the play. To be clear - this is a knock on coaching scheme not Kendricks

2:49: Whiff by Harrison Smith while Kendricks is swallowed up by a single blocker

2:57: Patrick Peterson is in decent coverage but completely unaware that the ball is coming to Hodgins who catches the TD

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5206
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:25:54 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

5:46: Kendricks covering Saquon, has no chance, big gain

6:06: Kendricks covering a WR Hodgins, not even in the same zipcode, big gain

6:18: The PP letting the TE go free for a TD play I posted about just a bit back. Seriously - watch this play and tell me PP should ever be on this team again. I dare you.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5207
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:32:08 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

7:46: Crucial 3rd-and-1 for the Giants on their own 34-yard-line. Hand off left to Breida. Kendricks misses, Hunter catches a piece but can't hold on, H Smith comes in and can't stop him either. A few plays later we stop them on 3rd-and-7 with a sack. They punt to us. Giants are ahead 24-21. This is our opportunity to take charge.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5208
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:35:11 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17929
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
Donashell's scheme is awful. Hicks was also often tasked with wr's on crossing routes and was flat footed as than ran by often wasn't within 20 yards shortly after the catch and thus graded better by PPF than Kendricks on coverage because he wasn't the closest defender and not charged with allowing the reception.

I hate the 3-4 because there are too many LB's on the field on any given snap and it was clearly apparent no one understood Donashell's scheme. Not even Donashell.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 5209
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:36:28 AM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeff Jesser

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

Yes, Kirk DID sabotage the 2022 season, by not getting a TD in either of his last 2 drives, and especially not really trying to convert the last 4th down pass.

The Vikings defensive coordinator made Kirk's job tough, and Kirk didn't rise to the occasion.

I don't want 'stability' at QB anymore, I want chance for greatness. And they should keep trying to draft that.




As shitty as that decision was (and it was very).....would it have mattered if he did? If they had 20 seconds on the clock and we kicked it out of the back of the endzone, how confident would you have been with us keeping them out of FG range?


Cousins literally did not have time to make a 'decision'.

Watch the play carefully. The pocket seemed normal for a split second, but quickly collapsed. There was a defender immediately up into Cousins on his left and another behind bearing down. He had less than 3 seconds. About 2.5. There are no 'check downs', no surveying the field, no weighing options in 2.5 seconds. He threw the ball as quickly as he could to the receiver in his line of sight. Because any completion (and hoping for some YAC) is better than getting sacked.

Now maybe you could argue a more agile QB could have avoided the pressure and bought a little more time. That's fair. But it would have taken an amazing play. A Minneapolis Miracle II.


Go back and watch kurt Warner's breakdown and if you don't take his word for it then so be it. 2.5 seconds is exactly the point where ESPN's Pass Block Win Rate (PBWR) threshold is. If the line holds for 2.5 seconds or more its a win. Less than 2.5 seconds its a loss. In other words, 2.5 seconds is what should be expected.

In regards to a more mobile QB - it would not have taken a miracle to avoid that pressure. A couple of steps and a pump fake would have done it.

Go back and watch Kurt the QB apologist Warner's breakdown and tell us where Cook and Osborne were on the play ...

Since Warner didn't cover that.

I know, 'why should I take some dumbass fan's opinion over Kurt Warner's' ... I get it.

But take a look. And be honest.


Alright I'm being serious here - what does this even mean? Warner DID cover where Osborne was on the play. He also said that was the correct read and throw. He also said Hockenson should never have even been in consideration once he chipped.

Am I missing something here?

No ... you are right. He goes into some detail about the route.

I had watched Warner's description of the play earlier, watched another web version several times and got confused.

My bad.

https://twitter.com/kurt13warner/status/1615019673908842498

I still think Warner seems to interpret the play as a Jefferson / Hockensen read option only. There were other options.


No. Within 2:20 in the video he says Hock was a no-go due to chipping and called a pass to JJ (I presume once he was in fact going to be doubled) "horrible".

Yes there were other options. Well, basically Osborn because he wouldn't throw to Theilen (implying the route design sucked). After re-watching, he never mentioned Cook. The 2023 Cook, ugh.

You're splitting hairs.

It may not have been the right read or option, the designed option, but Cousins saw the double team on Jefferson and dumped the ball to Hock. That's what happened. I am not saying it was the intended outcome from the get go or that Warner thought those were the two primary routes in the playcall ... in fact, he goes on and on about what he would have done differently / what should have happened ...

Warner says he 'completely understands why Kirk did what he did' and 'there were no other good options' (right after describing Osborne breaking inside off of Thielen's route).

Jefferson got bracketed - the pocket collapsed - Cousins went to his next read Hock. A very narrow perception of what was available on the field.

quote:

https://twitter.com/kurt13warner/status/1615019673908842498


From Warner's analysis (and I have a lot of respect for a QB who took 2 different teams to superbowls)
1) What a shitty play for 4th and 8 and your SEASON.
2) Kirk made a bad decision.

Right off the bat Kurt eliminates Thielen as the route has such a low chance of success.
Jefferson is put on the outside where the Giants have the best opportunity to take him out of the play.
Hock chips which takes him out of the play.
JESUS... talk about setting Kirk up for failure.

Warner very clearly states you should be peeking at JJ and if you don't like what you see you should be reading left to middle route of KJ.
Clearly he thinks Kirk threw the wrong option.

KOC and Kirk can hold hands in the blame taking... a terrible last play to a pretty amazing season.

Strongly agree. Not the best play to convert a 4th and 8.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 5210
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:38:05 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17929
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

7:46: Crucial 3rd-and-1 for the Giants on their own 34-yard-line. Hand off left to Breida. Kendricks misses, Hunter catches a piece but can't hold on, H Smith comes in and can't stop him either. A few plays later we stop them on 3rd-and-7 with a sack. They punt to us. Giants are ahead 24-21. This is our opportunity to take charge.

It was and we needed to score TD's on every drive but could only muster a FG. So much for the high powered offense.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 5211
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:39:35 AM   
bstinger


Posts: 16530
Joined: 7/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

JESUS... talk about setting Kirk up for failure.


TBH I'm not real impressed with KOC and his offense. He got this group of players to overachieve which is a great attribute for a HC. But clearly he wasn't the brains behind the operation for the LAR offense.

Agree, seems to be a great motivator, but unimpressed with his creativity so far. There is nothing wrong with that as long as he realizes he needs someone else to be the real OC and call the plays so he can concentrate on the HC duties, which I prefer anyway.

_____________________________

"You guys are true athletes!"

--twinsfan
Post #: 5212
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:40:48 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

9:42: 2nd-and-10 for the Giants, Hicks is covering Slayton. Huge gain.

9:54: Quick throw to left, Bynum whiffs. Ten yard gain.

10:47: 4th-and-1 for the Giants in the red zone. Obvious QB sneak situation. Vikes have 3?????? defenders in the box while six guys just stand around 3-5 yards back???????

They score a TD shortly after to go up 31-24. Vikes offense will get two more chances even though the defense has been poor. Get ready for some check downs and some throws behind the WRs.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5213
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:44:08 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
great posts and analysis and discussion guys

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 5214
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:45:42 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
I like KOC, its his first year, and i do think we saw some rookie mistakes...

all i ask for is learn from the mistakes


3rd and 1 needs to be addressed

getting too cute needs to be addressed



top down defense needs to be addressed

< Message edited by drviking -- 1/19/2023 11:50:16 AM >


_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 5215
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:45:43 AM  1 votes
Karl Juhnke


Posts: 13029
Joined: 7/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

The whole series was a cluster ****…

That’s on KOC.

“KC had no time…”

That’s different from the entire season, how?

Stop excusing a mediocre QB..

Just stop.


I'm no Cousins bobo. He's OK but If they decided to go another direction at QB that'd be fine with me. But don't say he made a bad 'decision' on the last play. Because it's just wrong.


Actually you are wrong, assuming Curt Warner knows more than you. Watch Warner discuss the play in the link provided. Warner doesn't bash Cousins, but methodically discusses the play.

Warner said once Hock chipped the defender at the LOS and knowing JJ was bracketed, the right side was likely a no-go. He said Cousins should have done a quick peek to JJ then looked LEFT. He implies Cousins knew Hock was going to chip so is basically eliminated right away as an option (wonder if Hock screwed up?).

So in reality KFC screwed the pooch with a bad decision right from the get-go. Of course he turtled with the throw itself as well.


Nothing to the left was an option, due to pressure. That’s my whole point. Warner does an excellent job of breaking down the patterns and coverage. But glosses over what position the QB is in at the time. He only makes brief mention of it, because he’s too caught up in what the reads should have been in theory. He freezes and rewinds multiple times, and every single time ignores the fact that Cousins had a defender FROM THE LEFT two feet away from him at full speed at the instant he threw the ball.

That effectively takes away the entire left side of the field, I don’t give a shit what patterns were going on there. So his only ‘options’ if you want to call it that are a doubled Jefferson or Hock who had chipped and didn’t even have time to get 8 yards down the field. Hock has shown good ability to gain extra yards and have a nose for the sticks, so it wasn’t entirely a surrender, but it was the slightly less bad of two (at most) bad options.

< Message edited by Karl Juhnke -- 1/19/2023 11:46:43 AM >
Post #: 5216
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:46:50 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

7:46: Crucial 3rd-and-1 for the Giants on their own 34-yard-line. Hand off left to Breida. Kendricks misses, Hunter catches a piece but can't hold on, H Smith comes in and can't stop him either. A few plays later we stop them on 3rd-and-7 with a sack. They punt to us. Giants are ahead 24-21. This is our opportunity to take charge.

It was and we needed to score TD's on every drive but could only muster a FG. So much for the high powered offense.


This drive ended in a FG after the famous false start on 4th-and-1 which really super sucked. What gets ignored is that on the third-down-play just prior Cousins threw well short of the sticks - something that was happening A LOT in that game.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5217
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:48:13 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

The whole series was a cluster ****…

That’s on KOC.

“KC had no time…”

That’s different from the entire season, how?

Stop excusing a mediocre QB..

Just stop.


I'm no Cousins bobo. He's OK but If they decided to go another direction at QB that'd be fine with me. But don't say he made a bad 'decision' on the last play. Because it's just wrong.


Actually you are wrong, assuming Curt Warner knows more than you. Watch Warner discuss the play in the link provided. Warner doesn't bash Cousins, but methodically discusses the play.

Warner said once Hock chipped the defender at the LOS and knowing JJ was bracketed, the right side was likely a no-go. He said Cousins should have done a quick peek to JJ then looked LEFT. He implies Cousins knew Hock was going to chip so is basically eliminated right away as an option (wonder if Hock screwed up?).

So in reality KFC screwed the pooch with a bad decision right from the get-go. Of course he turtled with the throw itself as well.


Nothing to the left was an option, due to pressure. That’s my whole point. Warner does an excellent job of breaking down the patterns and coverage. But glosses over what position the QB is in at the time. He only makes brief mention of it, because he’s too caught up in what the reads should have been in theory. He freezes and rewinds multiple times, and every single time ignores the fact that Cousins had a defender FROM THE LEFT two feet away from him at full speed at the instant he threw the ball.

That effectively takes away the entire left side of the field, I don’t give a shit what patterns were going on there. So his only ‘options’ if you want to call it that are a doubled Jefferson or Hock who had chipped and didn’t even have time to get 8 yards down the field. Hock has shown good ability to gain extra yards and have a nose for the sticks, so it wasn’t entirely a surrender, but it was the slightly less bad of two (at most) bad options.


Like I said, if you want to discount Warner's analysis so be it.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 5218
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:49:30 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
my plan as GM

Hire Rick Spielman as a consultant to evaluate the top 5 QBs in this year's draft, prepare reports and rank them 1 to 5

Immediately move up to draft his 5th ranked QB

Trade KC, if possible, if not try a mid season trade, if not...work the rookie in throughout the year


tell all our FAs thanks for the memories

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 5219
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 11:51:10 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU_G-l9IKg8

7:46: Crucial 3rd-and-1 for the Giants on their own 34-yard-line. Hand off left to Breida. Kendricks misses, Hunter catches a piece but can't hold on, H Smith comes in and can't stop him either. A few plays later we stop them on 3rd-and-7 with a sack. They punt to us. Giants are ahead 24-21. This is our opportunity to take charge.

It was and we needed to score TD's on every drive but could only muster a FG. So much for the high powered offense.


This drive ended in a FG after the famous false start on 4th-and-1 which really super sucked. What gets ignored is that on the third-down-play just prior Cousins threw well short of the sticks - something that was happening A LOT in that game.



it sure felt a lot more like Kirk than the rest of the season

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 5220
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 12:11:22 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2396
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Karl Juhnke

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

The whole series was a cluster ****…

That’s on KOC.

“KC had no time…”

That’s different from the entire season, how?

Stop excusing a mediocre QB..

Just stop.


I'm no Cousins bobo. He's OK but If they decided to go another direction at QB that'd be fine with me. But don't say he made a bad 'decision' on the last play. Because it's just wrong.


Actually you are wrong, assuming Curt Warner knows more than you. Watch Warner discuss the play in the link provided. Warner doesn't bash Cousins, but methodically discusses the play.

Warner said once Hock chipped the defender at the LOS and knowing JJ was bracketed, the right side was likely a no-go. He said Cousins should have done a quick peek to JJ then looked LEFT. He implies Cousins knew Hock was going to chip so is basically eliminated right away as an option (wonder if Hock screwed up?).

So in reality KFC screwed the pooch with a bad decision right from the get-go. Of course he turtled with the throw itself as well.


Nothing to the left was an option, due to pressure. That’s my whole point. Warner does an excellent job of breaking down the patterns and coverage. But glosses over what position the QB is in at the time. He only makes brief mention of it, because he’s too caught up in what the reads should have been in theory. He freezes and rewinds multiple times, and every single time ignores the fact that Cousins had a defender FROM THE LEFT two feet away from him at full speed at the instant he threw the ball.

That effectively takes away the entire left side of the field, I don’t give a shit what patterns were going on there. So his only ‘options’ if you want to call it that are a doubled Jefferson or Hock who had chipped and didn’t even have time to get 8 yards down the field. Hock has shown good ability to gain extra yards and have a nose for the sticks, so it wasn’t entirely a surrender, but it was the slightly less bad of two (at most) bad options.


That's simply not true... KJ is breaking to the middle and Kirk could have thrown an anticipation/hope pass there just as easily as Hock.
Warner knows a little bit about QBing.
That was the play.

And if that is NOT the play... you gotta heave it up and give JJ a chance.

Hock checkdown is a mistake.

It's a bad playcall setting up Kirk for failure... but if he throws it down the middle to KJ or even heaves a hail mary to JJ... a lot of this angst goes away.

< Message edited by beo -- 1/19/2023 12:13:37 PM >
Post #: 5221
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 12:29:06 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2396
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
I read somwhere by someone that Jayron Kearse was the "best" defensive draft pick the Vikings had since 2016.
I thought that was a ridiculous take!
And then I looked at the data... unbelievable how bare the defensive cupboard has become...

Some guys still have a chance to develop (Dantzler, Patrick Jones, Metellus).
Some guys have done ok elsewhere (Epps, Hughes).

But you COULD make a legitimate argument that Kearse outplayed everyone else this year...
What a sad indictment.
Not 1 star has emerged from this group (as of yet) in 6 years of drafts.

2022 1 Lewis Cine DB
2022 2 Andrew Booth CB
2022 3 Brian Asamoah LB
2022 4 Akayleb Evans DB
2022 5 Esezi Otomewo DT
2021 3 Chazz Surratt LB
2021 3 Patrick Jones II DL
2021 4 Camryn Bynum CB
2021 4 Janarius Robinson DE
2021 6 Jaylen Twyman DL
2020 1 Jeff Gladney CB
2020 3 Cameron Dantzler CB
2020 4 D.J. Wonnum DE
2020 4 James Lynch DT
2020 4 Troy Dye LB
2020 5 Harrison Hand CB
2020 6 Josh Metellus S
2020 7 Kenny Willekes DE
2020 7 Brian Cole II S
2019 5 Cameron Smith LB
2019 6 Armon Watts DT
2019 6 Marcus Epps S
2019 7 Kris Boyd CB
2018 1 Mike Hughes CB
2018 4 Jalyn Holmes DE
2018 6 Ade Aruna DE
2018 7 Devante Downs LB
2017 4 Jaleel Johnson DT
2017 4 Ben Gedeon ILB
2017 7 Ifeadi Odenigbo DL
2017 7 Elijah Lee LB
2017 7 Jack Tocho CB
2016 2 Mackensie Alexander CB
2016 5 Kentrell Brothers OLB
2016 7 Stephen Weatherly OLB
2016 7 Jayron Kearse

< Message edited by beo -- 1/19/2023 12:32:15 PM >
Post #: 5222
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 12:37:57 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 14027
Status: offline
We can go back and look at tape, or read the game day threads for the season..

KOC played too cute for his own good at least once a game..

Some times it worked, sometimes not.

The one irrefutably consistent offensive failure was holding the ball too long, then throwing a shitty Checkdown short of the line to gain or even the line of scrimmage.

Kirk Stan’s can point fingers at any ****ing thing they want and defend his stats and season till the cows come home.

The fact is that his contract, his inability to read and process the routes on any given play, in less than 4 seconds, and his all important completion percentage and robotic inability to change a play, makes him mediocre, at best.

We will win nothing with him as QB.

We will win nothing by sentimentality overpaying aged vets like cook, Thielen, Kendricks, et.Al, and the Donatello firing does not happen sooner rather than later.

We aRe in dead cap hell and there is only one way out.

Cut or trade if possible, those expensive contracts, especially with the defense, and start a full rebuild around obvious talent.

If I owned this team, I pull both Cousins and Donatello into the office with KAM and KOC and I pointedly, fire KC and Donatello, on the spot, eat the dead money, and tell the management to deal with it and build a winning culture and team.

< Message edited by Daniel Lee Young -- 1/19/2023 12:49:13 PM >


_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 5223
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 12:47:15 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2396
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

We can g back and look at tape, or read the game day threads for the season..

KOC played too cute for his own good at least once a game..

Some times it worked, sometimes not.

The one irrefutably consistent offensive failure was holding the ball too long, then throwing a shittycheckdown short of the line to gain or even the line of scrimmage.

Kirk Stan’s can point fingers at any ****ing thing they want and defend his stats and season till the cows come home.

The fact is that his contract, his inability toread and process the routes on any given play in less than 4 seconds, and his all important completion percentage and robotic inability to change a play, makes him mediocre, at best.

We will win nothing with him as QB.
We will win nothing by sentimentality overpaying aged vets like cook, Thielen, Kendricks, et.Al, and the Donatello firing does not happen sooner rather than later.

We at
Re in dead cap hell and there is only one way out.

Cut or trade if possible those expensive contracts, especially with the defense,and start a full rebuild around obvious talent.

If I owned this team, I pull both Cousins and Donatello into the office with KAM and KOC and I pointedly, fire KC and Donatello, on the spot, eat the dead money, and tell the management to deal with it and build a winning culture and team.


Kirk got his rookie HC 13 wins... he ain't going anywhere.
KOC got Kirk to grow... actually looking like a guy who would take chances at points.
My guess is KOC thinks he can continue to grow Kirk.
We shall see.
Post #: 5224
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/19/2023 12:51:28 PM   
ronhextall


Posts: 6271
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

I read somwhere by someone that Jayron Kearse was the "best" defensive draft pick the Vikings had since 2016.
I thought that was a ridiculous take!
And then I looked at the data... unbelievable how bare the defensive cupboard has become...

Some guys still have a chance to develop (Dantzler, Patrick Jones, Metellus).
Some guys have done ok elsewhere (Epps, Hughes).

But you COULD make a legitimate argument that Kearse outplayed everyone else this year...
What a sad indictment.
Not 1 star has emerged from this group (as of yet) in 6 years of drafts.

2022 1 Lewis Cine DB
2022 2 Andrew Booth CB
2022 3 Brian Asamoah LB
2022 4 Akayleb Evans DB
2022 5 Esezi Otomewo DT
2021 3 Chazz Surratt LB
2021 3 Patrick Jones II DL
2021 4 Camryn Bynum CB
2021 4 Janarius Robinson DE
2021 6 Jaylen Twyman DL
2020 1 Jeff Gladney CB
2020 3 Cameron Dantzler CB
2020 4 D.J. Wonnum DE
2020 4 James Lynch DT
2020 4 Troy Dye LB
2020 5 Harrison Hand CB
2020 6 Josh Metellus S
2020 7 Kenny Willekes DE
2020 7 Brian Cole II S
2019 5 Cameron Smith LB
2019 6 Armon Watts DT
2019 6 Marcus Epps S
2019 7 Kris Boyd CB
2018 1 Mike Hughes CB
2018 4 Jalyn Holmes DE
2018 6 Ade Aruna DE
2018 7 Devante Downs LB
2017 4 Jaleel Johnson DT
2017 4 Ben Gedeon ILB
2017 7 Ifeadi Odenigbo DL
2017 7 Elijah Lee LB
2017 7 Jack Tocho CB
2016 2 Mackensie Alexander CB
2016 5 Kentrell Brothers OLB
2016 7 Stephen Weatherly OLB
2016 7 Jayron Kearse


You would have to be a huge Vikings fan to recognize more than 3-4 names out of that list.

Speilman was stealing money his final few seasons
Post #: 5225
Page:   <<   < prev  207 208 [209] 210 211   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  207 208 [209] 210 211   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode