Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  292 293 [294] 295 296   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 10:23:34 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.
Post #: 7326
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 10:38:08 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7327
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:02:03 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7328
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:12:52 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7329
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:16:06 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 3/28/2023 11:17:28 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7330
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:32:09 AM   
Ricky J


Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
Or not everyone believes we are 200 miles away with Cousins like so many here do. And they believe chances of winning with him are better than the crap shoot with the rookie QB. Two sides and it can get ugly debating it, no dobut
Post #: 7331
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:37:51 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7332
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:44:39 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 3/28/2023 11:47:59 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7333
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:53:32 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Nice job on that smackdown.

Ponder. Then deeper into the well with Daunte. We'll be into Warren Moon territory soon. Why not George Shaw.

Kirk 2nd or 3rd best ever, LMAO! Tarkenton, Kramer, Kapp, Culpepper, Brad Johnson... even Favre were way better. Kirk is around Wade Wilson territory, an easily forgotten never-was if it wasn't for the franchise being so stupid with his contracts.
Post #: 7334
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:53:46 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
I am fine with Sending Kirk to NYJ and SF; they have Pro Bowlers everywhere and most likely win a super bowl.......anyone saying Kirk is the issue didn't watch SF, KC, Philly, Cincy, or Buffalo play.

Teams loaded with Pro Bowl players.....you are tying the problem to Kirk when it is about overall team talent.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7335
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:57:36 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
So forget the others. This is about KIRK COUSINS. One playoff win in 11 seasons.
Post #: 7336
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 11:57:44 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Nice job on that smackdown.

Ponder. Then deeper into the well with Daunte. We'll be into Warren Moon territory soon. Why not George Shaw.

Kirk 2nd or 3rd best ever, LMAO! Tarkenton, Kramer, Kapp, Culpepper, Brad Johnson... even Favre were way better. Kirk is around Wade Wilson territory, an easily forgotten never-was if it wasn't for the franchise being so stupid with his contracts.


That is totally your jaded opinion. Kirk has passed all of them but Tark and Tommy. Favre was here for 1.5 years. Brad played parts of 3 years before he came back with Chilly. You may want to look at your examples stats.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 3/28/2023 11:59:54 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7337
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 12:02:54 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen
So forget the others. This is about KIRK COUSINS. One playoff win in 11 seasons.


The 2nd best QB arguably in Vikings history. A team currently with 0 championships. You are aiming for a qb to win a championship; but lets gut the team, JJ, Kirk, etc. rebuild it down to the studs for 2-3 years....makes sense.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7338
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 12:06:49 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
200 miles away with Cousins? This is not the 1800s and we don't travel by horse and wagons. In relative terms we are 200,000 miles away.

Dude has one playoff victory in 11 seasons but somehow he's going to win three or four in a single season? Is it drugs, cult-worship, or religion? The upside down grins after going 3 and out?

Kirk Not-It Cousins.
Post #: 7339
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 12:10:58 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?


Here's a link to the 2019 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: There are Vikings on both offense and defense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Pro_Bowl

2018 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: Vikings all over the place, offense and defense represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Pro_Bowl

2020 Pro Bowl roster. You guessed it - Vikings on O and D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Pro_Bowl

2021 Pro Bowl roster: You got me on this one. Only two Vikings and they are both offense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pro_Bowl

2022 Pro Bowl roster: 5 Pro Bowlers! Again O and D both represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Pro_Bowl

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7340
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 12:13:27 PM  1 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
This user is on your "block" list and the message has been blocked.

I love technology.
Post #: 7341
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 12:16:00 PM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
I also see a suggestion that I use % of cap for specifically this year. Just stop. Seriously. Through some dangerous and irresponsible accounting they managed to push $28 million of Kirk's cap figure into next year. That by no means, in any way, shape, or form, does not change the truth that his cost is $48 million for his play in 2023. $48 FREAKING MILLION! I don't really know where we can go from here.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7342
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 12:52:33 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

I also see a suggestion that I use % of cap for specifically this year. Just stop. Seriously. Through some dangerous and irresponsible accounting they managed to push $28 million of Kirk's cap figure into next year. That by no means, in any way, shape, or form, does not change the truth that his cost is $48 million for his play in 2023. $48 FREAKING MILLION! I don't really know where we can go from here.


$28.5 million but what's another $500k.

The very same people who (erroneously) complain KC never had defensive talent around him don't even bat an eye at the obscene, 100% guaranteed money he hoovers up... money from the exact same source that could be used to acquire additional talent!

Anyway, I'm glad the team said go pound sand to his wanting two more years fully guaranteed. Guess he thought he'd continue to call the shots and the team would cave yet again, for whatever dumb reason. Greedy bastard.
Post #: 7343
yui890-9+-*+ - 3/28/2023 12:54:38 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
dup
Post #: 7344
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 1:47:26 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?


Here's a link to the 2019 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: There are Vikings on both offense and defense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Pro_Bowl

2018 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: Vikings all over the place, offense and defense represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Pro_Bowl

2020 Pro Bowl roster. You guessed it - Vikings on O and D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Pro_Bowl

2021 Pro Bowl roster: You got me on this one. Only two Vikings and they are both offense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pro_Bowl

2022 Pro Bowl roster: 5 Pro Bowlers! Again O and D both represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Pro_Bowl


How many Pro Bowlers for KC? How many for Buffalo...remember in 98 when we had 9? You think this team is setup to win it all and I have read suggestions about getting rid of 2 of their Pro Bowlers.....Kirk and JJ. Great plans....

About as good of ideas as trading AP and Moss in their prime.

Kirk is 9% of 2023 cap. Again you are looking in the wrong place.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 3/28/2023 1:49:17 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7345
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 1:49:52 PM  2 votes
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?


Here's a link to the 2019 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: There are Vikings on both offense and defense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Pro_Bowl

2018 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: Vikings all over the place, offense and defense represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Pro_Bowl

2020 Pro Bowl roster. You guessed it - Vikings on O and D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Pro_Bowl

2021 Pro Bowl roster: You got me on this one. Only two Vikings and they are both offense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pro_Bowl

2022 Pro Bowl roster: 5 Pro Bowlers! Again O and D both represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Pro_Bowl


How many Pro Bowlers for KC? How many for Buffalo...remember in 98 when we had 9? You think this team is setup to win it all and I have read suggestions about getting rid of 2 of their Pro Bowlers.....Kirk and JJ. Great plans....


Dude, I don't know. Look that crap up yourself. I've done enough of your homework for one day.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7346
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 1:54:50 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?


Here's a link to the 2019 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: There are Vikings on both offense and defense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Pro_Bowl

2018 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: Vikings all over the place, offense and defense represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Pro_Bowl

2020 Pro Bowl roster. You guessed it - Vikings on O and D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Pro_Bowl

2021 Pro Bowl roster: You got me on this one. Only two Vikings and they are both offense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pro_Bowl

2022 Pro Bowl roster: 5 Pro Bowlers! Again O and D both represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Pro_Bowl


How many Pro Bowlers for KC? How many for Buffalo...remember in 98 when we had 9? You think this team is setup to win it all and I have read suggestions about getting rid of 2 of their Pro Bowlers.....Kirk and JJ. Great plans....

About as good of ideas as trading AP and Moss in their prime.

Kirk is 9% of 2023 cap. Again you are looking in the wrong place.

Pro Bowl is a joke. Huntley(Ravens) threw for 2 TDs this year and made it. All Pro teams have the best players chosen.

Anyway, let KC play this year, draft a QB this year or trade for Lance. The results we have this year will sort out what we need to do after that.
Post #: 7347
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 1:56:06 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?


Here's a link to the 2019 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: There are Vikings on both offense and defense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Pro_Bowl

2018 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: Vikings all over the place, offense and defense represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Pro_Bowl

2020 Pro Bowl roster. You guessed it - Vikings on O and D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Pro_Bowl

2021 Pro Bowl roster: You got me on this one. Only two Vikings and they are both offense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pro_Bowl

2022 Pro Bowl roster: 5 Pro Bowlers! Again O and D both represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Pro_Bowl


How many Pro Bowlers for KC? How many for Buffalo...remember in 98 when we had 9? You think this team is setup to win it all and I have read suggestions about getting rid of 2 of their Pro Bowlers.....Kirk and JJ. Great plans....


Dude, I don't know. Look that crap up yourself. I've done enough of your homework for one day.


I already looked it up....they have way more talent on their team....pro bowlers is just one way to look at it.

KC and Cincy have/had #3 WR better than on 2nd and a better defense....somehow some ignorant posters don't see how stacked the top 4 of the AFC, Philly, and 49ers were.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 3/28/2023 1:58:59 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7348
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 2:01:32 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
Talk about a dumbo package....those suggesting Kirk wasn't worth the money spent are lining up in that formation on this thread daily.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 7349
RE: General Vikes Talk - 3/28/2023 2:05:02 PM  1 votes
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

How did Ponder even enter the equation?

Oh wait, I see how. Another case of 'ButWhatAbout'.


If you don't keep Kirk Cousins you automatically get Christian Ponder. Try to keep up.


Oh yeah Championship QBs Ponder, Teddy, Sam, then Case....if you really want to keep up. Ponder was the start (forcing a QB decision). Then another force to Teddy.

I would love to see Hooker in the 2nd or the Purdue QB O'Connell in the mid rounds...natural passers that can move that don't seem forced.


You can just as well lump Kirk in with the others in my opinion Only we didn't hand out fully guaranteed god-tier contracts to the others.


How many games has he missed? Also look at Dante's career record in comparasion. Kirk isn't the greatest QB ever but it wasn't a bad signing when you take into account the QB injuries we had....

Kirk is our 2nd or 3rd best qb in history...him and Tommy.

You can keep saying QB contracts but that is what the market is and was. Jets offered him more than we did and Denver a little less.


My expectations for success go up as the contract goes up. I don't define success as durability, decent stats, or even comeback wins even though all those things can contribute to success. I define success as what we do in the playoffs. In a one-off scenario I'll listen to arguments about having a bad defense, a bad O-line, a bad call by a ref, etc... But over course of five seasons all those excuses become less relevant. Kirk won one playoff game and then shit his pants in the game that followed. All the other QBs you've mentioned so far (Case, Ponder, Teddy, Daunte, and Sam Bradford) have a combined playoff record of 3-4. Kirk is 1-3. You mocked these other QBs calling them "Championship QBs" and yet they've collectively been better in the playoffs than Kirk.


Collectively better Defenses and Offense talent around them. $$$ goes up every year. Maybe you may want to look at something else....% of cap this year is where you may want to look. The Vikings have had Pro Bowl talent surronding those QBs on defense and offense. Cutting and trading Kirk is going to fix that also?

The main reason given is winning a championship isn't it? Did those QBs win it after or before we acquired them?


Here's a link to the 2019 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: There are Vikings on both offense and defense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Pro_Bowl

2018 Pro Bowl roster. Spoiler alert: Vikings all over the place, offense and defense represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Pro_Bowl

2020 Pro Bowl roster. You guessed it - Vikings on O and D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Pro_Bowl

2021 Pro Bowl roster: You got me on this one. Only two Vikings and they are both offense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Pro_Bowl

2022 Pro Bowl roster: 5 Pro Bowlers! Again O and D both represented.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Pro_Bowl


How many Pro Bowlers for KC? How many for Buffalo...remember in 98 when we had 9? You think this team is setup to win it all and I have read suggestions about getting rid of 2 of their Pro Bowlers.....Kirk and JJ. Great plans....


Dude, I don't know. Look that crap up yourself. I've done enough of your homework for one day.


I already looked it up....they have way more talent on their team....pro bowlers is just one way to look at it.

KC and Cincy have/had #3 WR better than on 2nd and a better defense....somehow some ignorant posters don't see how stacked the top 4 of the AFC, Philly, and 49ers were.


No shit. Trust me I know all about how championship teams have built their teams. I've posted about KC and Mahomes specifically within the last two weeks. I've laid out my plan in a fair amount of detail. My QB strategy is in my signature. Kirk Cousins is costing $48.5 million dollars for what we get from him in 2023 - we'll just take the cap hit for over half of it next year when he's not even on the roster. I have no plans to trade JJ so stop with that. Stick to what we're actually saying and stop bringing in phantom arguments when your existing one is falling short.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 7350
Page:   <<   < prev  292 293 [294] 295 296   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  292 293 [294] 295 296   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode