Bill Johanesen
Posts: 29986
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Arlowe84 Not sure if true or not, but read somewhere that Kwesi presented a plan to the Wilfs to tear the team down or competitive rebuild, and they wanted the competitive rebuild. But yeah, not blown away by Kwesi. 2 drafts, Has added a very good WR2 and a young LB (did he get lucky with Pace?). I guess you could say he's added some depth the the secondary, but that's about it Have added no other impact defensive players. 1 outright bust in Cine, and what appears to be just a bunch of guys at CB. Evans, Booth, Blackmon. Evans has been downright awful. But giving him the benefit of the doubt we have "depth" I guess his "success" is trading for Hockensen, and signing him. But I think there is also a legitimate argument that now is the time to draft young/cheap TEs. They seem to be all over the league these days. 10 years ago TE was a premium position, but college passing games have really developed the TE. A questionable contract to Mattison in a time where RBs are devalued. Go young and cheap, questionable contract to a blocking TE in Oliver, Davenport was a joke Hicks was fine, but nothing spectacular. We really just needed a LBer with some size. If he let's Hunter go, without compensation, that's an eff up. They could have gotten a couple picks for him 2/3rd round to help with rebuild. What concerns me most is 2 years in and we have a lot of question on the defense with lots of holes. Who's our cornerstones of the future? Mettellus and Pace? That's pretty weak. No 3 rd pick this year. If we go QB at 1, are we drafting any impact defensive players this year? It'a an alarming situation for sure. Presenting two options, if true, is bogus and shows he was just a job seeker. A real GM or even someone with conviction would say I've studied the team and, based on MY philosophy, have a strategy and a plan that aligns with that strategy.
|