Murph
Posts: 2027
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: beo quote:
ORIGINAL: bstinger quote:
ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson quote:
ORIGINAL: bstinger The competitive rebuild was the wrong course of action and I was strongly in favor of a tear down. We did get to enjoy an entertaining yet hollow 13-4 season last year, all the while knowing we weren't good enough to win the SB with that team. We've wasted 2 years of JJ and are further away from competing for a SB. Not only are the cupboards pretty bare for next year, but we're paying a lot of dead cap. We have maybe 5 guys under team control that other teams would covet and they are all on offense. I love JJ, but we need to use that asset to kickstart the rebuild. Instead of paying him and Darrisaw big time extensions get some draft capital for them and anyone else that is tradeable. Tear it down to the studs and start by building quality OL and DL. I'm tired of being dominated in the trenches all the time. Go 1-16 next year with Hall and Mullens as your QB and draft #1 overall in 2025. Get your QB and skill positions go from there, should have a bunch of FA money at that point too to fill in the gaps. You probably draft petty high again in 2026 as the new QB has some growing pains, but 2027 and beyond you should be very competitive if the GM and scouts did their jobs. (Hopefully not Queasy) We are position to get a QBOTF this draft. Why wait? Like Bill says, sit out FA and get dead cap in order. By 2025, hopefully we have QBOTF and cap room. Do you want the 3rd or 4th best QB on the board, because that's all you're getting in the 8-12 range that we're projected at. I'd rather wait a year and have the best guy that year. If you get the QB this year and still suck because the rest of the roster is bad, you not only run the risk of ruining your QBOTF, but you burn a year of his rookie scale contract for nothing. You are making a couple of big assumptions: 1) You are assuming you can successfully tank to guarantee to get the "best" guy next year. That could easily backfire... Vikes had the 3rd pick the year Andrew Luck came out... there was no QB available at 3. 2) You are assuming that 3rd/4th picked this year is WORSE than 1st guy picked next year. Mitch Tribisky was first guy picked at one point. If this is a spectacular year of QBs (I don't know... but supposedly it is)... QBs this year might be better than next. If there is a qb you like this year and he is available... you take him. IMO Next year we not not draft as high or have as many top QB prospect to choose from. I really think this is the year to go for it. If they love someone like Daniels and he's there at say, pick 4 or 5, go up and get him! Spend the rest of this and next year's draft, along with FA to fix the D and shore up the Oline.
_____________________________
Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
|