Tom Sykes
Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Chris Olson quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: marty I watched a few evaluations of Nix, Penix and Daniels. The thing I liked about Nix was the quick release, and the accuracy. I would like to see an evaluation that doesn't think a QB will make it on the NFL, and goes into detail why, with no sugar coating of their positive traits. Would you draft Sam Brafford knowing what you know now (you probably will get 4-5 good to very good years)? That was the question Judd posed about Penix. Probably not because those years are not in a row with Bradford, and his longest streak was two healthy years in a row... and his good years were really only a little above average Sam was injured/out for the season in the 3rd game of 2009 after his Heisman season...kind of amazing that he went first in the draft Seems like a fair comparison though for Penix...he has had 2 straight healthy years now, but you never know... I have mixed feelings on injured guys... 1. an injury can happen to anyone at anytime 2. just seems that too often a guy with injury history is a guy with injury future I like Penix and am rooting for him, but I don't think I would chance it I think thats fair. For me, kinda depends on where you take him … he’s healthy but its such a costly, high investment risk where some people are talking about him now (top 15) … I dont want to live in fear but it has to weigh in versus the other prospects available. Kwesi seems to have no hesitation with injuries, if anything, the opposite, the cost value outweighs the risk by far …
< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 4/9/2024 10:39:58 AM >
|