Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  228 229 [230] 231 232   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 7:47:46 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.


Being realistic may seem like ripping (when you really want your USC QB to succeed). He had a good year but we won't be able to keep him as he alone doesn't make us a contender; that is being realistic.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5726
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:09:55 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5978
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.

Not me. I put the anointing oil away long ago.

Same

I got off the KOC bandwagon after the first Detoilet game, and his idiotic choices of play calls, like trick plays at THE WORST POSSIBLE game situations.

He better get his offensive line fixed or his rookie quarterback won't win nine games.

Overpaying Sam won’t help fix the oline. KOC overachieved but then you get into the playoffs and talent matters plus your qb has to perform.

Talent, QB … AND your OC has to put them in the right situations. KOC can’t throw the ball for Darnold so play to play you have to start at the QB in meltdown. But taken drive by drive, qtr by qtr in both games, COTYKOC was not calling playoff caliber plays. Thete are other variables, ofcourse, but if those two are going to hog the credit for the reg season …

You can’t tell me the Giants or hobbled Lions had more talent on defense than we did on offense. IOL vs DT ok.

Otherwise, we got bullied.

Neither the 2022 or the 2024 team went into the playoffs prepared or with good gameplans. Or with adequate adjustments throughout the game.

Giants and Vikes game was a one score game. Lions game with a normal Sam game would have been closer.

We had probably a better roster than GB and Washington in the playoffs in the NFC. Lots of roster work to be done.

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

The Giants were the worst team in the playoffs. A one score game does nothing for your argument.

‘If’ normal Sam …? If the Lions team bus had driven into a lake, they would have forfeited the game. So what. Stick to what happened (Glenn outcoached KOC and made Darnold look like pre-vikings Darnold).

I can’t even address your last two comments … I’m not smart enough to see how they follow.

I’m not trying to bust your chops Phil … KOC has to take some blame for both teams he led into the playoffs. If he loses his next one, 0-3 puts him in the history books with the only other two coaches to do that (one is buddy Ryan … cant remember the other).

I want KOC to slam dunk 2025. The playoffs … the reg season is just for shits and giggles.

Pretty simple. He is a top coach who overachieved in 22 and 24 with at best a top 10 qb and lesser talent than the majority in the playoffs.

Say what you want about the Rams and Giants in those years but it wasn’t like we had the 98 and 09 teams in terms of talent. You still need a top talent team to win it all.

Nothing simple about it. You can reduce it down if that makes it easy for you to digest.

He’s got a ways to go in my book. Even though I think he’s a good coach … 13-4 and 14-3 say a lot, two overachieving teams.

Right now, he’s Jim Mora in 1987, his second season as a HC with the Saints. They went 12-3, Mora won COTY, before losing to the Vikings in a wildcard card game, 44-10. A great turnaround for the franchise.

A good coach.

Mora went on to go 0-6 in the playoffs.

I’ll wait until KOC wins a playoff game … shewt, is at least competitive in a playoff game, before I label him very good or whatever.

EDIT: I see Richard beat me to that last point.

< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 2/10/2025 9:13:41 AM >
Post #: 5727
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:12:17 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.

Not me. I put the anointing oil away long ago.

Same

I got off the KOC bandwagon after the first Detoilet game, and his idiotic choices of play calls, like trick plays at THE WORST POSSIBLE game situations.

He better get his offensive line fixed or his rookie quarterback won't win nine games.

Overpaying Sam won’t help fix the oline. KOC overachieved but then you get into the playoffs and talent matters plus your qb has to perform.

Talent, QB … AND your OC has to put them in the right situations. KOC can’t throw the ball for Darnold so play to play you have to start at the QB in meltdown. But taken drive by drive, qtr by qtr in both games, COTYKOC was not calling playoff caliber plays. Thete are other variables, ofcourse, but if those two are going to hog the credit for the reg season …

You can’t tell me the Giants or hobbled Lions had more talent on defense than we did on offense. IOL vs DT ok.

Otherwise, we got bullied.

Neither the 2022 or the 2024 team went into the playoffs prepared or with good gameplans. Or with adequate adjustments throughout the game.

Giants and Vikes game was a one score game. Lions game with a normal Sam game would have been closer.

We had probably a better roster than GB and Washington in the playoffs in the NFC. Lots of roster work to be done.

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

The Giants were the worst team in the playoffs. A one score game does nothing for your argument.

‘If’ normal Sam …? If the Lions team bus had driven into a lake, they would have forfeited the game. So what. Stick to what happened (Glenn outcoached KOC and made Darnold look like pre-vikings Darnold).

I can’t even address your last two comments … I’m not smart enough to see how they follow.

I’m not trying to bust your chops Phil … KOC has to take some blame for both teams he led into the playoffs. If he loses his next one, 0-3 puts him in the history books with the only other two coaches to do that (one is buddy Ryan … cant remember the other).

I want KOC to slam dunk 2025. The playoffs … the reg season is just for shits and giggles.

Pretty simple. He is a top coach who overachieved in 22 and 24 with at best a top 10 qb and lesser talent than the majority in the playoffs.

Say what you want about the Rams and Giants in those years but it wasn’t like we had the 98 and 09 teams in terms of talent. You still need a top talent team to win it all.

Nothing simple about it. You can reduce it down if that makes it easy for you to digest.

He’s got a ways to go in my book. Even though I think he’s a good coach … 13-4 and 14-3 say a lot, two overachieving teams.

Right now, he’s Jim Mora in 1987, his second season as a HC with the Saints. They went 12-3, Mora won COTY, before losing to the Vikings in a wildcard card game, 44-10. A great turnaround for the franchise.

A good coach.

Mora went on to go 0-6 in the playoffs.

I’ll wait until KOC wins a playoff game … shewt, is at least competitive in a playoff game, before I label him as good or very good or whatever.


22 against the Giants was a 1 score game; 24 was a Sam Shewt but yeah everyone prefers that.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5728
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:23:34 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5978
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.

Not me. I put the anointing oil away long ago.

Same

I got off the KOC bandwagon after the first Detoilet game, and his idiotic choices of play calls, like trick plays at THE WORST POSSIBLE game situations.

He better get his offensive line fixed or his rookie quarterback won't win nine games.

Overpaying Sam won’t help fix the oline. KOC overachieved but then you get into the playoffs and talent matters plus your qb has to perform.

Talent, QB … AND your OC has to put them in the right situations. KOC can’t throw the ball for Darnold so play to play you have to start at the QB in meltdown. But taken drive by drive, qtr by qtr in both games, COTYKOC was not calling playoff caliber plays. Thete are other variables, ofcourse, but if those two are going to hog the credit for the reg season …

You can’t tell me the Giants or hobbled Lions had more talent on defense than we did on offense. IOL vs DT ok.

Otherwise, we got bullied.

Neither the 2022 or the 2024 team went into the playoffs prepared or with good gameplans. Or with adequate adjustments throughout the game.

Giants and Vikes game was a one score game. Lions game with a normal Sam game would have been closer.

We had probably a better roster than GB and Washington in the playoffs in the NFC. Lots of roster work to be done.

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

The Giants were the worst team in the playoffs. A one score game does nothing for your argument.

‘If’ normal Sam …? If the Lions team bus had driven into a lake, they would have forfeited the game. So what. Stick to what happened (Glenn outcoached KOC and made Darnold look like pre-vikings Darnold).

I can’t even address your last two comments … I’m not smart enough to see how they follow.

I’m not trying to bust your chops Phil … KOC has to take some blame for both teams he led into the playoffs. If he loses his next one, 0-3 puts him in the history books with the only other two coaches to do that (one is buddy Ryan … cant remember the other).

I want KOC to slam dunk 2025. The playoffs … the reg season is just for shits and giggles.

Pretty simple. He is a top coach who overachieved in 22 and 24 with at best a top 10 qb and lesser talent than the majority in the playoffs.

Say what you want about the Rams and Giants in those years but it wasn’t like we had the 98 and 09 teams in terms of talent. You still need a top talent team to win it all.

Nothing simple about it. You can reduce it down if that makes it easy for you to digest.

He’s got a ways to go in my book. Even though I think he’s a good coach … 13-4 and 14-3 say a lot, two overachieving teams.

Right now, he’s Jim Mora in 1987, his second season as a HC with the Saints. They went 12-3, Mora won COTY, before losing to the Vikings in a wildcard card game, 44-10. A great turnaround for the franchise.

A good coach.

Mora went on to go 0-6 in the playoffs.

I’ll wait until KOC wins a playoff game … shewt, is at least competitive in a playoff game, before I label him as good or very good or whatever.


22 against the Giants was a 1 score game; 24 was a Sam Shewt but yeah everyone prefers that.

I’m trying very hard not to get all pissy but you are tasking me.

Stomping your feet and saying that over and over again, after its been summarily shredded, doesn’t make it more true.

I can’t believe I bothered to look up Mora or anything in a response.

I’m so ashamed.
Post #: 5729
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:28:32 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,
Post #: 5730
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:34:21 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5731
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:36:41 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.

Not me. I put the anointing oil away long ago.

Same

I got off the KOC bandwagon after the first Detoilet game, and his idiotic choices of play calls, like trick plays at THE WORST POSSIBLE game situations.

He better get his offensive line fixed or his rookie quarterback won't win nine games.

Overpaying Sam won’t help fix the oline. KOC overachieved but then you get into the playoffs and talent matters plus your qb has to perform.

Talent, QB … AND your OC has to put them in the right situations. KOC can’t throw the ball for Darnold so play to play you have to start at the QB in meltdown. But taken drive by drive, qtr by qtr in both games, COTYKOC was not calling playoff caliber plays. Thete are other variables, ofcourse, but if those two are going to hog the credit for the reg season …

You can’t tell me the Giants or hobbled Lions had more talent on defense than we did on offense. IOL vs DT ok.

Otherwise, we got bullied.

Neither the 2022 or the 2024 team went into the playoffs prepared or with good gameplans. Or with adequate adjustments throughout the game.

Giants and Vikes game was a one score game. Lions game with a normal Sam game would have been closer.

We had probably a better roster than GB and Washington in the playoffs in the NFC. Lots of roster work to be done.

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

The Giants were the worst team in the playoffs. A one score game does nothing for your argument.

‘If’ normal Sam …? If the Lions team bus had driven into a lake, they would have forfeited the game. So what. Stick to what happened (Glenn outcoached KOC and made Darnold look like pre-vikings Darnold).

I can’t even address your last two comments … I’m not smart enough to see how they follow.

I’m not trying to bust your chops Phil … KOC has to take some blame for both teams he led into the playoffs. If he loses his next one, 0-3 puts him in the history books with the only other two coaches to do that (one is buddy Ryan … cant remember the other).

I want KOC to slam dunk 2025. The playoffs … the reg season is just for shits and giggles.

Pretty simple. He is a top coach who overachieved in 22 and 24 with at best a top 10 qb and lesser talent than the majority in the playoffs.

Say what you want about the Rams and Giants in those years but it wasn’t like we had the 98 and 09 teams in terms of talent. You still need a top talent team to win it all.

Nothing simple about it. You can reduce it down if that makes it easy for you to digest.

He’s got a ways to go in my book. Even though I think he’s a good coach … 13-4 and 14-3 say a lot, two overachieving teams.

Right now, he’s Jim Mora in 1987, his second season as a HC with the Saints. They went 12-3, Mora won COTY, before losing to the Vikings in a wildcard card game, 44-10. A great turnaround for the franchise.

A good coach.

Mora went on to go 0-6 in the playoffs.

I’ll wait until KOC wins a playoff game … shewt, is at least competitive in a playoff game, before I label him as good or very good or whatever.


22 against the Giants was a 1 score game; 24 was a Sam Shewt but yeah everyone prefers that.

I’m trying very hard not to get all pissy but you are tasking me.

Stomping your feet and saying that over and over again, after its been summarily shredded, doesn’t make it more true.

I can’t believe I bothered to look up Mora or anything in a response.

I’m so ashamed.


Mora and KOC is a good comparo but the real answer will be how KOC answers questions about playoff aspirations.
Post #: 5732
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:46:02 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 2/10/2025 9:47:25 AM >
Post #: 5733
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:50:10 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5978
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.

Not me. I put the anointing oil away long ago.

Same

I got off the KOC bandwagon after the first Detoilet game, and his idiotic choices of play calls, like trick plays at THE WORST POSSIBLE game situations.

He better get his offensive line fixed or his rookie quarterback won't win nine games.

Overpaying Sam won’t help fix the oline. KOC overachieved but then you get into the playoffs and talent matters plus your qb has to perform.

Talent, QB … AND your OC has to put them in the right situations. KOC can’t throw the ball for Darnold so play to play you have to start at the QB in meltdown. But taken drive by drive, qtr by qtr in both games, COTYKOC was not calling playoff caliber plays. Thete are other variables, ofcourse, but if those two are going to hog the credit for the reg season …

You can’t tell me the Giants or hobbled Lions had more talent on defense than we did on offense. IOL vs DT ok.

Otherwise, we got bullied.

Neither the 2022 or the 2024 team went into the playoffs prepared or with good gameplans. Or with adequate adjustments throughout the game.

Giants and Vikes game was a one score game. Lions game with a normal Sam game would have been closer.

We had probably a better roster than GB and Washington in the playoffs in the NFC. Lots of roster work to be done.

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

The Giants were the worst team in the playoffs. A one score game does nothing for your argument.

‘If’ normal Sam …? If the Lions team bus had driven into a lake, they would have forfeited the game. So what. Stick to what happened (Glenn outcoached KOC and made Darnold look like pre-vikings Darnold).

I can’t even address your last two comments … I’m not smart enough to see how they follow.

I’m not trying to bust your chops Phil … KOC has to take some blame for both teams he led into the playoffs. If he loses his next one, 0-3 puts him in the history books with the only other two coaches to do that (one is buddy Ryan … cant remember the other).

I want KOC to slam dunk 2025. The playoffs … the reg season is just for shits and giggles.

Pretty simple. He is a top coach who overachieved in 22 and 24 with at best a top 10 qb and lesser talent than the majority in the playoffs.

Say what you want about the Rams and Giants in those years but it wasn’t like we had the 98 and 09 teams in terms of talent. You still need a top talent team to win it all.

Nothing simple about it. You can reduce it down if that makes it easy for you to digest.

He’s got a ways to go in my book. Even though I think he’s a good coach … 13-4 and 14-3 say a lot, two overachieving teams.

Right now, he’s Jim Mora in 1987, his second season as a HC with the Saints. They went 12-3, Mora won COTY, before losing to the Vikings in a wildcard card game, 44-10. A great turnaround for the franchise.

A good coach.

Mora went on to go 0-6 in the playoffs.

I’ll wait until KOC wins a playoff game … shewt, is at least competitive in a playoff game, before I label him as good or very good or whatever.


22 against the Giants was a 1 score game; 24 was a Sam Shewt but yeah everyone prefers that.

I’m trying very hard not to get all pissy but you are tasking me.

Stomping your feet and saying that over and over again, after its been summarily shredded, doesn’t make it more true.

I can’t believe I bothered to look up Mora or anything in a response.

I’m so ashamed.


Mora and KOC is a good comparo but the real answer will be how KOC answers questions about playoff aspirations.

Right, part of the issue IMO is, we have almost been too successful in the regular season.

I know thats an ass bachwards thing to say, I couldnt be happier winning ANY game …

but the ego thing of self-evaluation, does KOC think that 13-4 and 14-3 confirms his approach and strategy or is he going look at the playoff beatdowns as a call to change.

(Same goes for Kwesi)
Post #: 5734
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:57:17 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5735
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 9:58:31 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
KOC gets extended by management and here come the soft warm pro-KOC posts.

How can anyone keep pointing to a home loss to the Giants from two years ago and being destroyed by the Rams as justification for, well anything?

44% of NFL teams make the playoffs each year.

At least 50% and probably more are in or "in the hunt" in the last week of the regular season.

So you barely escape the sewer then get bounced as soon as you starting crawling onto a street? Get out the trumpets!
Post #: 5736
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:03:54 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?
Post #: 5737
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:07:00 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Funny, you guys rip the quarterback that got the Vikings to 15-2 because he didnt play well in the final two games but you praise a coach that was horrific in those two games.

Not me. I put the anointing oil away long ago.

Same

I got off the KOC bandwagon after the first Detoilet game, and his idiotic choices of play calls, like trick plays at THE WORST POSSIBLE game situations.

He better get his offensive line fixed or his rookie quarterback won't win nine games.

Overpaying Sam won’t help fix the oline. KOC overachieved but then you get into the playoffs and talent matters plus your qb has to perform.

Talent, QB … AND your OC has to put them in the right situations. KOC can’t throw the ball for Darnold so play to play you have to start at the QB in meltdown. But taken drive by drive, qtr by qtr in both games, COTYKOC was not calling playoff caliber plays. Thete are other variables, ofcourse, but if those two are going to hog the credit for the reg season …

You can’t tell me the Giants or hobbled Lions had more talent on defense than we did on offense. IOL vs DT ok.

Otherwise, we got bullied.

Neither the 2022 or the 2024 team went into the playoffs prepared or with good gameplans. Or with adequate adjustments throughout the game.

Giants and Vikes game was a one score game. Lions game with a normal Sam game would have been closer.

We had probably a better roster than GB and Washington in the playoffs in the NFC. Lots of roster work to be done.

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

The Giants were the worst team in the playoffs. A one score game does nothing for your argument.

‘If’ normal Sam …? If the Lions team bus had driven into a lake, they would have forfeited the game. So what. Stick to what happened (Glenn outcoached KOC and made Darnold look like pre-vikings Darnold).

I can’t even address your last two comments … I’m not smart enough to see how they follow.

I’m not trying to bust your chops Phil … KOC has to take some blame for both teams he led into the playoffs. If he loses his next one, 0-3 puts him in the history books with the only other two coaches to do that (one is buddy Ryan … cant remember the other).

I want KOC to slam dunk 2025. The playoffs … the reg season is just for shits and giggles.

Pretty simple. He is a top coach who overachieved in 22 and 24 with at best a top 10 qb and lesser talent than the majority in the playoffs.

Say what you want about the Rams and Giants in those years but it wasn’t like we had the 98 and 09 teams in terms of talent. You still need a top talent team to win it all.

Nothing simple about it. You can reduce it down if that makes it easy for you to digest.

He’s got a ways to go in my book. Even though I think he’s a good coach … 13-4 and 14-3 say a lot, two overachieving teams.

Right now, he’s Jim Mora in 1987, his second season as a HC with the Saints. They went 12-3, Mora won COTY, before losing to the Vikings in a wildcard card game, 44-10. A great turnaround for the franchise.

A good coach.

Mora went on to go 0-6 in the playoffs.

I’ll wait until KOC wins a playoff game … shewt, is at least competitive in a playoff game, before I label him as good or very good or whatever.


22 against the Giants was a 1 score game; 24 was a Sam Shewt but yeah everyone prefers that.

I’m trying very hard not to get all pissy but you are tasking me.

Stomping your feet and saying that over and over again, after its been summarily shredded, doesn’t make it more true.

I can’t believe I bothered to look up Mora or anything in a response.

I’m so ashamed.


Mora and KOC is a good comparo but the real answer will be how KOC answers questions about playoff aspirations.

Right, part of the issue IMO is, we have almost been too successful in the regular season.

I know thats an ass bachwards thing to say, I couldnt be happier winning ANY game …

but the ego thing of self-evaluation, does KOC think that 13-4 and 14-3 confirms his approach and strategy or is he going look at the playoff beatdowns as a call to change.

(Same goes for Kwesi)



I've thought that too. I mean it's good to win games, but yes it's a validation.

A better approach is ok you got to the playoffs twice in three years and both appearances were one and done. Including scoring 9 points against the Rams. Let's go from there on the evaluation.
Post #: 5738
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:13:16 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch. Even a great QB like Jaylen couldn't dismiss the talent Philly had.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 2/10/2025 10:22:04 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5739
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:16:25 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5978
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
It will be interesting to see where we go from here.

I can’t think of a GM less likely to embrace the neanderthal look of Eagles football [THAN KWESI] … but I bet many GMs are waking up this morning ready to jump back into stone age 1960s football. No more fantsy pantsy QBs and frilly passing attacks.

The second age of big lineman, gaps in the teeth and leather helmets is about to begin.

< Message edited by Tom Sykes -- 2/10/2025 10:38:58 AM >
Post #: 5740
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:20:54 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch.


Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking.

Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.
Post #: 5741
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:23:13 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch.


Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking.

Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.


I was saying you were right and you wouldn't take the credit...

Cutting or trading most of your high level talent for draft picks is tanking to me.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 2/10/2025 10:24:40 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5742
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:26:52 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
Darrisaw in 2022-23 is a good example for the subject of tanking. A very good young player at a premium position still on his rookie deal. A pro-tanker would have wanted him traded for, likely, future picks.

This is not a difficult topic.
Post #: 5743
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:30:37 AM   
marty


Posts: 13274
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I am not very tech savvy:

Is there a way I can set things up to where I only read what someone posted last, with out the long white quotations that come with it ?

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 5744
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:34:38 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch.


Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking.

Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.


I was saying you were right and you wouldn't take the credit...

Cutting or trading most of your high level talent for draft picks is tanking to me.


I'm not taking credit for a misrepresentation of what I said.

Do you ever quit misrepresenting things?

Moving aged, underperforming, high $ veterans is vastly different than "trading most of your high level talent". Tomlinson, Dalvin Cook, Za Smith (the disgruntled version), Kendricks, Thielen, etc. Go back and look at their cap hits. Kwesi wisely let them go.

None of that involves tanking.

And how you lumped in Kwesi using credit cards being even remotely involved with tanking is beyond me.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 2/10/2025 10:38:24 AM >
Post #: 5745
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 10:49:23 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch.


Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking.

Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.


I was saying you were right and you wouldn't take the credit...

Cutting or trading most of your high level talent for draft picks is tanking to me.


I'm not taking credit for a misrepresentation of what I said.

Do you ever quit misrepresenting things?

Moving aged, underperforming, high $ veterans is vastly different than "trading most of your high level talent". Tomlinson, Dalvin Cook, Za Smith (the disgruntled version), Kendricks, Thielen, etc. Go back and look at their cap hits. Kwesi wisely let them go.

None of that involves tanking.

And how you lumped in Kwesi using credit cards being even remotely involved with tanking is beyond me.


Dammit Bill you wanted to gut the team that offseason.....that is tanking.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5746
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 11:54:44 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch.


Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking.

Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.


I was saying you were right and you wouldn't take the credit...

Cutting or trading most of your high level talent for draft picks is tanking to me.


I'm not taking credit for a misrepresentation of what I said.

Do you ever quit misrepresenting things?

Moving aged, underperforming, high $ veterans is vastly different than "trading most of your high level talent". Tomlinson, Dalvin Cook, Za Smith (the disgruntled version), Kendricks, Thielen, etc. Go back and look at their cap hits. Kwesi wisely let them go.

None of that involves tanking.

And how you lumped in Kwesi using credit cards being even remotely involved with tanking is beyond me.


Dammit Bill you wanted to gut the team that offseason.....that is tanking.


Just stop distorting, which is what you routinely do.

I've explained the posts and thoughts behind cutting the deadwood, and explained how that's different from tanking.

Since you have direct access to my past posts, show where I wanted to cut building blocks like Darrisaw, Bynum, etc.

Not sure why you are fabricating things out of nowhere.. did you have money on the Chiefs?
Post #: 5747
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 12:10:30 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
The life of a Phil strawman. Full of distortions, goalpost movement, ill-defined concepts, weird additions, and outright BS:

Phil: Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Me: "Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

Phil: 2023 you weren’t? (which makes zero sense because I just said I was))

Me: You literally did not read my post.

Phil: Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.

Me: I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3. And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

Phil: There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.

Me: (Basically laughing at that, like what's up with the Kwesi thing?)

Phil: Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason.

Me: Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking. Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.

Phil: Cutting or trading most of your high level talent for draft picks is tanking to me

Me: Darrisaw in 2022-23 is a good example for the subject of tanking. A very good young player at a premium position still on his rookie deal. A pro-tanker would have wanted him traded for, likely, future picks. This is not a difficult topic.

Me: Moving aged, underperforming, high $ veterans is vastly different than "trading most of your high level talent". Tomlinson, Dalvin Cook, Za Smith (the disgruntled version), Kendricks, Thielen, etc. Go back and look at their cap hits. Kwesi wisely let them go. None of that involves tanking. And how you lumped in Kwesi using credit cards being even remotely involved with tanking is beyond me.

Phil: Dammit Bill you wanted to gut the team that offseason.....that is tanking.

Me: I've explained the posts and thoughts behind cutting the deadwood, and explained how that's different from tanking. Since you have direct access to my past posts, show where I wanted to cut building blocks like Darrisaw, Bynum, etc.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 2/10/2025 12:13:53 PM >
Post #: 5748
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 12:11:18 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 28596
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Weird many said tank last year and now they should of beat everyone this year.

Rethink those extremes.

"Many" were not advocating tanking. I damn sure was during the 0-3 start. But then we went 1-3, 1-4 (still a chance!), then 2-4 which put a damper on things.

As for this year, "many" did not think they should have beat everyone. Most were realistic, thought anything after at least 16 games was gravy, etc.

2023 you weren’t?



You literally did not read my post,


Oh I read it....You wanted to tank before that....but keep trying.


Provide such comments.

I have advocated playing the backups in a meaningless final game in order to gain say 5 draft positions. That isn't tanking the season like in the beginning of 2023 while going 0-3.

And any call for tanking is mostly just an idle desire because no player is going to intentionally play bad and no coach will coach bad. It would have to be the GM trading key players for future assets. JJ is the only player I seriously hoped they'd consider trading - that wasn't for tanking but for $ - and it would have required a boatload in return.

But again, show otherwise.


There was more than that Mr. Kwesi Credit Card all that offseason. You solidified you stance but in no way did it start after 1-3. It may have been the best opinion yet you still pretend.


More than that? Credit cards?

First, stay on topic and stop moving the goalposts.

Second, if you believe that saying Kwesi uses credit cards is somehow tied to tanking then I can't help you.

What's next in your topic drift?


Again...you said to tank and trade and cut as much as possible that offseason. Basically it was a good take for 2023 yet you say you didn't say it.
Trying to give you credit.
My take on the previous post was that we saw it both in 2022 and 2024 seasons and portion of 2023 with 3rd string QBs performances he is a top coach. Still need to give you coach the talent to win. A poor QB performance really showed the talent mismatch.


Maybe you need to work on the definition of tanking.

Offseason posts about cutting high-priced veterans who are not playing to the level of their contracts is about rebuilding, not tanking. And yeah, take the pain instead of half-assing it like blowing $40 million on a one-year Cousins extension. That basically meant getting ahead of the cap issues sooner.


I was saying you were right and you wouldn't take the credit...

Cutting or trading most of your high level talent for draft picks is tanking to me.


I'm not taking credit for a misrepresentation of what I said.

Do you ever quit misrepresenting things?

Moving aged, underperforming, high $ veterans is vastly different than "trading most of your high level talent". Tomlinson, Dalvin Cook, Za Smith (the disgruntled version), Kendricks, Thielen, etc. Go back and look at their cap hits. Kwesi wisely let them go.

None of that involves tanking.

And how you lumped in Kwesi using credit cards being even remotely involved with tanking is beyond me.


Dammit Bill you wanted to gut the team that offseason.....that is tanking.


Just stop distorting, which is what you routinely do.

I've explained the posts and thoughts behind cutting the deadwood, and explained how that's different from tanking.

Since you have direct access to my past posts, show where I wanted to cut building blocks like Darrisaw, Bynum, etc.

Not sure why you are fabricating things out of nowhere.. did you have money on the Chiefs?


Nah I don't bet on football games.
I play fantasy football bestball and a little bit of fantasy baseball bestball but that is about it.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 5749
RE: General Vikes Talk - 2/10/2025 12:24:11 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 29584
Status: offline
So this morning's conclusion from Phil is when your team has a plethora of high-cost, old veteran deadwood needing to be cut in order to get on the right side of the cap, hoping for/posting about such cuts equates to.. you guessed it... tanking.
Post #: 5750
Page:   <<   < prev  228 229 [230] 231 232   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  228 229 [230] 231 232   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode