RE: 2015 WR's.xtra

Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums Register Login My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums

Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ Ticket List Log Out

RE: 2015 WR's.xtra

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2015 WR's.xtra

Page: << < prev 140 141 [142] 143 144 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 2015 WR's.xtra - 8/20/2016 2:08:47 PM

Ian Joseph

Posts: 15350
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Los Angeles, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Black 47

And the kicking game isn't their biggest problem. The offensive line is still really bad. Can someone tell me what happened to Mike Harris? Last I heard they were still mum on it.

No one knows.

_____________________________

Hate the message, not the messenger.

Enjoy the process; crave the goal.

Believe.

Post #: 3526

RE: 2015 WR's.xtra - 8/20/2016 2:09:52 PM

Ian Joseph

Posts: 15350
Joined: 7/15/2007
From: Los Angeles, CA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Black 47

Respect your opinion. But I don't see it. You have to be able to trust your kicker. Nothing drains a team mentally than a kicker you can't trust. Every kick is an adventure. He has no finesse on the short ones. He drills every one and he don't know where it's going. I'm going to be proven right on him. The situation just reeks of disaster.

And Locke has to be the worst punter in the NFL at pinning them inside the 20. They all go out the back of the endzone.

You have to definitely trust your kicker, but the difference is YOU don't trust him; Zimmer does.

Theyre not going to cut him. Not outright in the preseason. Not before signing or drafting a replacement.

_____________________________

Hate the message, not the messenger.

Enjoy the process; crave the goal.

Believe.

Post #: 3527

RE: 2015 WR's.xtra - 8/20/2016 3:04:51 PM

thebigo

Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline

Seems like we'd be best served if we send the entire team to the desert and nuke 'em all.

Post #: 3528

RE: 2015 WR's.xtra - 8/20/2016 5:47:31 PM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online

Walsh needs to work harder. He to often has bad footwork.

That can be corrected with repetition and clearly more focus.

If he has a bad year he will be gone.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3529

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/20/2016 7:21:12 PM

hagar

Posts: 2757
Joined: 3/3/2014
From: fresburg, ca
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian Joseph

quote:

ORIGINAL: hagar

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: hagar

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

IF the Packers win that first game, I think it will be a psychological blow which the Vikings won't recover.

You're a packer fan aren't you?

He must be. Been putting them on a pedestal on this thread constantly.

How long has he been doing that?

Years. Honestly, not even sure why you guys humor him with responses. Wash, rinse, repeat.

I wasn't humoring him. I had no idea that he was a packer fan. I always thought he was a Vikings fan.

Post #: 3530

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 12:31:57 AM

Guest

He's not a Packer fan, right Marty?
Just a fatalistic Viking fan living in Sconnieville.

_____________________________

I am collecting for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society in memory of my fiance who passed away on 9/9/2006. If anyone would like to donate just go to http://pages.lightthenight.org/mn/TwinCiti09/SMiller Any and all donations will be greatly appreciated.

Post #: 3531

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 4:25:27 AM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

< Message edited by marty -- 8/21/2016 4:29:38 AM >

Post #: 3532

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 4:32:31 AM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

Whatever optimism there is for the Packers is just that. It's not based on anything legit at all. They are old and worn down. They have no defense. Best possible outcome for that team is 10-6 and that is if a lot of things go right. Move on here people. Nothing to see.

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/31/2016 4:45:28 PM >

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 3533

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 8:42:50 AM

Guest

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

Whatever optimism there is for the Packers is just that. It's not based on anything legit at all. They are old and worn down. Aaron is more Erin now. They can't protect her and they have no defense. Best possible outcome for that team is 10-6 and that is if a lot of things go right. Move on here people. Nothing to see.

Actually the Packers are younger then us.

Rodgers is one of their oldest which some would say is their whole team anyway. Along with Pepers, and Matthews the represent the core of that team.

But they definitely are very young (3rd youngest in the NFL last year)

_____________________________

I am collecting for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society in memory of my fiance who passed away on 9/9/2006. If anyone would like to donate just go to http://pages.lightthenight.org/mn/TwinCiti09/SMiller Any and all donations will be greatly appreciated.

Post #: 3534

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 8:49:22 AM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

Whatever optimism there is for the Packers is just that. It's not based on anything legit at all. They are old and worn down. Aaron is more Erin now. They can't protect her and they have no defense. Best possible outcome for that team is 10-6 and that is if a lot of things go right. Move on here people. Nothing to see.

Actually the Packers are younger then us.

Rodgers is one of their oldest which some would say is their whole team anyway. Along with Pepers, and Matthews the represent the core of that team.

But they definitely are very young (3rd youngest in the NFL last year)

I didn't know that as a whole they were young.
I'm thinking of their significant players. Rodgers, Nelson, Mathews, Peppers.
Our significant players, Peterson, Teddy, Smith, Barr, Kendricks, Joseph, Griffen, Diggs.

Technically they may be younger than us, but we are for what matters younger than they are.

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 8/21/2016 8:50:55 AM >

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 3535

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 9:36:10 AM

Bill Jandro

Posts: 17928
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

Whatever optimism there is for the Packers is just that. It's not based on anything legit at all. They are old and worn down. Aaron is more Erin now. They can't protect her and they have no defense. Best possible outcome for that team is 10-6 and that is if a lot of things go right. Move on here people. Nothing to see.

Actually the Packers are younger then us.

Rodgers is one of their oldest which some would say is their whole team anyway. Along with Pepers, and Matthews the represent the core of that team.

But they definitely are very young (3rd youngest in the NFL last year)

I didn't know that as a whole they were young.
I'm thinking of their significant players. Rodgers, Nelson, Mathews, Peppers.
Our significant players, Peterson, Teddy, Smith, Barr, Kendricks, Joseph, Griffen, Diggs.

Technically they may be younger than us, but we are for what matters younger than they are.

I think guys like Newman and Hill spike are numbers.

Although TT rarely signs any FA's. So many young players make the roster every year.

Our core, as KG pointed out, is a lot younger with the exception of AD.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft

Post #: 3536

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/21/2016 9:46:11 AM

Guest

Oh there is no question we have a very young/ large core of our BEST players.

It always seemed to me that the Packers should be way older then us.

Just an interesting stat.

I'd go as far as to say we have most young talent in the NFL.

The media is hot on Oakland & Jacksonville's young talent. Well hell, the Raiders haven't gotten to .500 yet, the Jags were still very bad record wise last year, and all we did was win our division.

_____________________________

I am collecting for the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society in memory of my fiance who passed away on 9/9/2006. If anyone would like to donate just go to http://pages.lightthenight.org/mn/TwinCiti09/SMiller Any and all donations will be greatly appreciated.

Post #: 3537

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/30/2016 1:21:21 PM

Tim Cady

Posts: 10549
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: Wonderful World
Status: offline

Jarius Wright will be cut and he will be picked up by the New England Patriots to back up Edelman. The Early Shepard cut and the Sullivan trade rumors lead me to predict we will be picking up an extra Tackle that is not currently on our roster.

Bubble guys that make team: CPatt, Sherels, Trattou

Safety cut: Exum, Jr

_____________________________

Go the extra mile, it's never crowded!

Post #: 3538

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/30/2016 1:36:15 PM

Ricky J

Posts: 18357
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline

I dont see Sherels as bubble - lock

Post #: 3539

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/30/2016 1:37:19 PM

David Levine

Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tim Cady

Jarius Wright will be cut and he will be picked up by the New England Patriots to back up Edelman. The Early Shepard cut and the Sullivan trade rumors lead me to predict we will be picking up an extra Tackle that is not currently on our roster.

Bubble guys that make team: CPatt, Sherels, Trattou

Safety cut: Exum, Jr

He costs us 2.5M to keep, 2.2M to cut.

And I can't imagine we keep only 5 WRs. Especially with 1 being a rookie and one being Patterson.

Post #: 3540

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/30/2016 2:04:29 PM

ambear

Posts: 4387
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: Fort Lauderdale
Status: offline

Chris Tomasson ‏@christomasson · 5m5 minutes ago

Teddy bridgewater just went down looks serious Vikings end practice

Post #: 3541

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/30/2016 2:08:18 PM

ambear

Posts: 4387
Joined: 12/20/2007
From: Fort Lauderdale
Status: offline

chipscoggins ‏@chipscoggins · 1m1 minute ago

Players and coaches immediately spread out over field in shocked reaction as medical staff rushed to Bridgewater on ground

Post #: 3542

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/30/2016 5:31:05 PM 1 votes

McMurfy

Posts: 13792
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

Whatever optimism there is for the Packers is just that. It's not based on anything legit at all. They are old and worn down. Aaron is more Erin now. They can't protect her and they have no defense. Best possible outcome for that team is 10-6 and that is if a lot of things go right. Move on here people. Nothing to see.

Wasn't it you just a few days ago who went on and on and on about how terrible it was that Bill Parcells called Terry Glenn "She" 25 years ago and then you post this?

_____________________________

The Curse of Mauer is gone!

Post #: 3543

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/31/2016 1:40:09 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

Post #: 3544

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/31/2016 4:47:09 PM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: McMurfy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I hate the Packers and cheer against them. Sounds like a Packer fan, right ?

I might be more realistic than 'fatalistic' Art. I have a feeling this season could be a disappointment while right now I feel that 2017 will be the season the Vikes will put it all together.

But that could change in a hurry, like if the Vikes smoked the Packers in the first meeting. I think a loss at home would set the Vikes back, and they might not recover from it until if and when they get revenge by winning in Lambeau later in the season.

I would REALLY like to see the Vikes kill all this optimism surrounding the Pack (with regards to their fans, their team, and media about them) with a Vikings blowout win over them early on in the season.

Whatever optimism there is for the Packers is just that. It's not based on anything legit at all. They are old and worn down. Aaron is more Erin now. They can't protect her and they have no defense. Best possible outcome for that team is 10-6 and that is if a lot of things go right. Move on here people. Nothing to see.

Wasn't it you just a few days ago who went on and on and on about how terrible it was that Bill Parcells called Terry Glenn "She" 25 years ago and then you post this?

When it comes to Packer Bashing I get carried away. I apologize for this reference. However, Parcells was referring to his own player this way.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 3545

RE: 2015 WR's. - 8/31/2016 6:02:50 PM

McMurfy

Posts: 13792
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline

Fair enough, I do the same with the Packers

_____________________________

The Curse of Mauer is gone!

Post #: 3546

RE: 2015 WR's. - 9/4/2016 11:26:18 PM

marty

Posts: 13049
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

I still feel that 2017 is the year the Vikes put it all together and make the SB, possibly winning it.

I think Bradford is going to be a tease this year. I think he will have a career year, have the team smoking at the end of the year, but I just have a feeling things don't quite seem right (it is still Teddy's team), and Sam will get hurt and knocked out of the game in the Vikes 1st playoff game.

- I still think the Vikes will lose the 1st meeting with the Packers. Sam won't have the cohesion that Rodgers has with Nelson, Cobb and others.

- Bradford will do so well, the Vikes will re-sign him, and at some point in the 2017, they will have a QB controversy.

Post #: 3547

RE: 2015 WR's. - 9/5/2016 1:27:58 AM

kgdabom

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I still feel that 2017 is the year the Vikes put it all together and make the SB, possibly winning it.

I think Bradford is going to be a tease this year. I think he will have a career year, have the team smoking at the end of the year, but I just have a feeling things don't quite seem right (it is still Teddy's team), and Sam will get hurt and knocked out of the game in the Vikes 1st playoff game.

- I still think the Vikes will lose the 1st meeting with the Packers. Sam won't have the cohesion that Rodgers has with Nelson, Cobb and others.

- Bradford will do so well, the Vikes will re-sign him, and at some point in the 2017, they will have a QB controversy.

I predicted a QB controversy elsewhere and I hope it comes true. The only way we have a controversy is if Bradford is playing well.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."

Post #: 3548

RE: 2015 WR's. - 9/6/2016 10:20:24 AM

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39280
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I still feel that 2017 is the year the Vikes put it all together and make the SB, possibly winning it.

I think Bradford is going to be a tease this year. I think he will have a career year, have the team smoking at the end of the year, but I just have a feeling things don't quite seem right (it is still Teddy's team), and Sam will get hurt and knocked out of the game in the Vikes 1st playoff game.

- I still think the Vikes will lose the 1st meeting with the Packers. Sam won't have the cohesion that Rodgers has with Nelson, Cobb and others.

- Bradford will do so well, the Vikes will re-sign him, and at some point in the 2017, they will have a QB controversy.

I predicted a QB controversy elsewhere and I hope it comes true. The only way we have a controversy is if Bradford is playing well.

It would be a GOOD problem to have.

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”

Post #: 3549

RE: 2015 WR's. - 9/7/2016 9:26:32 AM

Trekgeekscott

Posts: 39280
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online

Well, it's upon us, the 2016 NFL season is here.

Time for my highly scientific well thought out, using the Pullitstraightouttamybutt method of expert analysis (what's wrong with that? it's what all the Pundits do).

Here it is,
My AFC predictions (NFC Predictions will come in another post)

AFC WEST - should be fiercely competitive.

Denver - That defense is otherworldly. They won the title because of it, no matter they have exactly 0 NFL experience at QB. They won last year with Brock Osweiler and the shadow of Peyton Manning. They will keep winning.

Oakland - team on the rise with a good QB WR and rising stars on defense. I see them making noise this year. no longer the doormat.

Chiefs - If they can avoid the injury bug they should do well. Injuries completely submarined their season last year. Already without the good Houston rushing the passer though. We'll see how it goes.

Chargers - They'll score and stop nobody from scoring. Philip Rivers is wasted here. and next year they play in LA.

AFC South - Is there a good team here?

Houston was a better team than people realize, they just didn't have a QB worth a spit last year. Is Osweiler the guy. In a word, NO. Will still struggle, especially with their superstar not on the field. But they may win the Division anyway because there are no good teams here.

Jacksonville Jaguars is a team that is improving. and could take a big leap forward. But they still wont be good. but they may win the division anyway because there are no good teams here.

Indianapolis Colts have Andrew Luck . But they may win the Division anyway because there are no good teams here.

Tennessee Titans. Some good young players but they earned the first overall pick in this years draft with their play last year... but they may win the division anyway because there are no good teams here.

AFC North Cincy Pitt. And those other guys.

Cincinnati - boy howdy if they could just do something in the playoffs...Because they are going there again. This division is theirs to lose.

Pittsburgh - but you can't count out the Steelers. Their D is questionable (hard to image that but it is true) but it will be an uphill climb

Baltimore - looking to do better than last year but still that isn't saying much.

Cleveland - complete rebuild in progress. If they win more than 3 games it will be a miracle.

AFC East - will this be the year that New England falters and some other team takes the division.

In a word...NO.

Brady will be back week 5, their opening four are cake and Belichick is pretty good at this coaching thing. They will then run off about 8 straight convincing wins as Brady is out to stick it to the NFL.

Buffalo will play well enough to compete with the Pats but only a Wildcard is possible.

J-E-T-S Jetc Jets Jets. Boles has them surprise many and with Fitz playing for another contract they are going to win more than people expect. Gang Green in the playoffs.

Dolphins - have been a mess since Shula retired and Marino hung em up. Nothing new here.

AFC Division winners
Patriots, Bengals, Broncos, Texans
Wild cards Oakland, Jets.

Bengals lose to Jets firs round
Texans lose to Oakland

Jets lose to Patriots
Oakland to Broncos

Patriots beat the rudderless Broncos
and go to Superbowl...again...

_____________________________

“There is no hate like Christian love.”

Post #: 3550