McMurfy
Posts: 13792
Joined: 7/31/2007
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: djskillz First of all; I'm not a millenial, as you know. Secondly, I know you hate the SEC and Saban. You got a good argument for someone better? I know all about the history, and follow it. I think the only argument against him is Bear Bryant. What Saban has done, in a tougher era, is much more impressive than what Bryant did IMO. And he's won at 2 schools. There's much more money in the sport now, and much more overall talent. Now there are 40 "good" teams, not 10, etc. I would make the same argument for Coach K vs. Wooden, but Wooden was much more dominant in his era than Bryant in his IMO. So I always think of Coach K and Wooden as about equals; equally impressive given their eras/competition. Again, who you arguing for over Saban? And who are you arguing for as a tougher overall conference in history than the SEC over the last 10 years or so? There have been FOUR different schools in the conference that have won a national title in a 10 year period. I'm pretty confident no other conference in history has matched that. First of all, Thank you for repeating all of the soundbites that are being used today in all media formats. That and the fact that you love Duke, the Lakers, the SEC, and Alabama, along with to a lesser extent the Patriots, and the Twins, who did win it twice during your formative years, tells me you don't have a whole lot of original thoughts or opinions. Much easier to just side with the Champions. Follwing the Vikings must be painful.
_____________________________
The Curse of Mauer is gone!
|