Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  243 244 [245] 246 247   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:31:29 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bstinger

quote:

ORIGINAL: David F.

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Rhodes in the pro bowl.


So there is that



Wowzers. The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame has more credibility than the NFL Pro Bowl.

It should. Total Apples and Oranges comparison here.


The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is famous for questionable inductees and ridiculous exclusions. That's where I was going with my comment.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 6101
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:35:47 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
I would be more interested in your plan moving forward.

We all know your evaluation of Kirk

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 6102
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:44:40 AM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

If Kirk Cousins has OCD does his over the top need to control every aspect of his play have an outcome on his performance on the field?

He plans out his day in 15 minute increments every day. He has a spreadsheet for it.

This may explain why in a football game when things go off schedule why he panics.. Its clear he stresses out showing huge anxiety on his face when things dont go as planned.

Also would have a role in time games are played. Creatures of habit, people with OCD often struggle with changes in routine, such as say start times, for instance a Monday Night game changing his entire routine to prepare.

BTW, not made up shit... google KIRK COUSINS OCD


I think I'll Google "Ragnarök Obsession" instead...

If you call it obsession to understand why your franchise QB who your team invested highly in to get OVER THE TOP and may be contemplating extending to further years of same... THEN YES... guess that I am... A true fan who obsesses over the details that allow my favorite team to be competitive with the only outcome cared about winning the Super Bowl....

How about this take on topic?

Kirk Cousins's play at the very end of losing games or when he is under assault is actually much better then his play at the beginning of games or when he has time. When he no longer has the option to think and is purely in the "fight or flight" mode his skills and decision making are elevated, when this is going on he has nothing to lose and no time to contemplate. Some on here claim he is scared which I disagree with, the fact that he stays in the pocket trying to extend the play foolishly indicates he is not afraid of contact. It appears that he is processing to much information on the conscious level instead of unconscious level. If he is afraid of anything its letting others down and this fear creates a hesitation, paralysis of analysis. Could this be overcome? Yes but super ****ing hard and the participant would need to be all in. Also the final outcome would have negative side effects in so much that the people in his life would most likely not like the "New" Kirk. Newtons third law, "for every action there is a equal and opposite reaction". Basically the kind and caring Kirk would become seeming callous. This is how Rodgers and Brady come off, aloof. And you don't have to be a prick to be aloof.



You're more the fan that would stand outside his house trying to get a glimpse through an open window. Your posting history is a masterclass in obsession. Some 12 year-old in Wisconsin could write a Facebook post about Cousins sucking and you'd rush here to re-post it.

Dude, you've said your own kids think its unhealthy...
Post #: 6103
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:46:46 AM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

I would be more interested in your plan moving forward.

We all know your evaluation of Kirk

My plan? Gee, lets see... does my plan even matter to our GM? well maybe he could get Tom Bradys agents number, as well as check in with free agents Tannehill and Keenum! maybe even call up ol buddy Teddy and see how things are going... Also heard that Chargers were giving up on Rivers... we know what Brees went on to do post Chargers...


Lets be real, Its Cousins and now it looks like talk of extending him as Rick looks to justify the move and create much needed cap space to even be relevant in filling holes. Last ditch effor by lame duck GM may tie us longer term to Kirk beyond said GMs tenure...
Post #: 6104
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:48:55 AM   
David F.


Posts: 10864
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
It could be worse. We could be stuck with Aaron Rodgers the next three seasons (yes I know he's under contract for the next four - the fourth year is very escapable). $21.6 million cap hit in 2020, $36.3 million cap hit in 2021, $39.9 million cap hit in 2022! All the while the dead money is huge until 2023. They are screwed! Three Zadarius Smiths on defense couldn't make up for that kind of arrogant, declining, heart-not-in-it-anymore, commercial sellout, toxic-relationship-having, dufus of a QB.

_____________________________

I wouldn't give ANY qb $30-50+ mil unless that QB had won me a Super Bowl. Did you win a Super Bowl on your rookie deal? Yes? Great! Here's your hugenormous contract. F it let's just run victory laps and love life. No? Good luck. Next!
Post #: 6105
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:56:15 AM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

If Kirk Cousins has OCD does his over the top need to control every aspect of his play have an outcome on his performance on the field?

He plans out his day in 15 minute increments every day. He has a spreadsheet for it.

This may explain why in a football game when things go off schedule why he panics.. Its clear he stresses out showing huge anxiety on his face when things dont go as planned.

Also would have a role in time games are played. Creatures of habit, people with OCD often struggle with changes in routine, such as say start times, for instance a Monday Night game changing his entire routine to prepare.

BTW, not made up shit... google KIRK COUSINS OCD


I think I'll Google "Ragnarök Obsession" instead...

If you call it obsession to understand why your franchise QB who your team invested highly in to get OVER THE TOP and may be contemplating extending to further years of same... THEN YES... guess that I am... A true fan who obsesses over the details that allow my favorite team to be competitive with the only outcome cared about winning the Super Bowl....

How about this take on topic?

Kirk Cousins's play at the very end of losing games or when he is under assault is actually much better then his play at the beginning of games or when he has time. When he no longer has the option to think and is purely in the "fight or flight" mode his skills and decision making are elevated, when this is going on he has nothing to lose and no time to contemplate. Some on here claim he is scared which I disagree with, the fact that he stays in the pocket trying to extend the play foolishly indicates he is not afraid of contact. It appears that he is processing to much information on the conscious level instead of unconscious level. If he is afraid of anything its letting others down and this fear creates a hesitation, paralysis of analysis. Could this be overcome? Yes but super ****ing hard and the participant would need to be all in. Also the final outcome would have negative side effects in so much that the people in his life would most likely not like the "New" Kirk. Newtons third law, "for every action there is a equal and opposite reaction". Basically the kind and caring Kirk would become seeming callous. This is how Rodgers and Brady come off, aloof. And you don't have to be a prick to be aloof.



You're more the fan that would stand outside his house trying to get a glimpse through an open window. Your posting history is a masterclass in obsession. Some 12 year-old in Wisconsin could write a Facebook post about Cousins sucking and you'd rush here to re-post it.

Dude, you've said your own kids think its unhealthy...

Im glad you can judge me and create a psych report on my being... That really shows your own strengths to this board...

I simply am posing known character traits of our QB as clearly documents and how they may contribute to the outcome of his play and enevitable ability to take this franchise to the goal we all seek.

Not asking all of you to agree or disagree, just musing on a board on a subject we all should be very connected to...

http://www.startribune.com/kirk-cousins-brain-was-in-sweet-spot-against-saints/566794392/?refresh=true

https://www.businessinsider.com/kirk-cousins-manages-life-beats-tom-brady-2017-11

https://kirkcousins.org/blogs/news/kirk-cousins-brain-coach-helps-him-cope-with-pressure-sleep-and-stay-in-a-flow-state


Obviously Kirk is very obsessed with his brain and how it relates to his play...

< Message edited by Ragnarök -- 1/21/2020 11:58:08 AM >
Post #: 6106
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:58:19 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

If Kirk Cousins has OCD does his over the top need to control every aspect of his play have an outcome on his performance on the field?

He plans out his day in 15 minute increments every day. He has a spreadsheet for it.

This may explain why in a football game when things go off schedule why he panics.. Its clear he stresses out showing huge anxiety on his face when things dont go as planned.

Also would have a role in time games are played. Creatures of habit, people with OCD often struggle with changes in routine, such as say start times, for instance a Monday Night game changing his entire routine to prepare.

BTW, not made up shit... google KIRK COUSINS OCD


I think I'll Google "Ragnarök Obsession" instead...





- All I ask is for a little variety. Its the same stuff over and over.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 6107
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 11:59:19 AM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

I would be more interested in your plan moving forward.

We all know your evaluation of Kirk

My plan? Gee, lets see... does my plan even matter to our GM? well maybe he could get Tom Bradys agents number, as well as check in with free agents Tannehill and Keenum! maybe even call up ol buddy Teddy and see how things are going... Also heard that Chargers were giving up on Rivers... we know what Brees went on to do post Chargers...


Lets be real, Its Cousins and now it looks like talk of extending him as Rick looks to justify the move and create much needed cap space to even be relevant in filling holes. Last ditch effor by lame duck GM may tie us longer term to Kirk beyond said GMs tenure...


You almost made it without mentioning Cousins.

Brady maybe

Obviously we have to find a trade for our pro bowl QB

Not interested in Rivers

Tannehill is same as cousins

Teddy supposedly was upset about letting him go, so he is not likely to be back

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 6108
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:00:12 PM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
Keenum is not worth mentioning

I would be fine with vet minimum back up

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 6109
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:01:16 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
Keenum and many QBs do similar "brain activities". Keenum does hours of VR.

Maybe research what others do so there is a basis of comparison?

< Message edited by Pager -- 1/21/2020 12:05:35 PM >


_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 6110
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:04:25 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

I would be more interested in your plan moving forward.

We all know your evaluation of Kirk

My plan? Gee, lets see... does my plan even matter to our GM? well maybe he could get Tom Bradys agents number, as well as check in with free agents Tannehill and Keenum! maybe even call up ol buddy Teddy and see how things are going... Also heard that Chargers were giving up on Rivers... we know what Brees went on to do post Chargers...


Lets be real, Its Cousins and now it looks like talk of extending him as Rick looks to justify the move and create much needed cap space to even be relevant in filling holes. Last ditch effor by lame duck GM may tie us longer term to Kirk beyond said GMs tenure...


You almost made it without mentioning Cousins.

Brady maybe

Obviously we have to find a trade for our pro bowl QB

Not interested in Rivers

Tannehill is same as cousins

Teddy supposedly was upset about letting him go, so he is not likely to be back


Tannehill doesn't reach the open market. Rivers is a TO machince and couldn't rollout to save his life. Brady is going to be 44?

Its an exercise in futility. With 31M - we cant afford two high priced QBs. I guess we could trade and then sign. And revamp our offense to accommodate, just when we finally got a career year out of Cousins. But it would technically "be a plan".

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 6111
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:12:22 PM   
CPAMAN

 

Posts: 36324
Joined: 3/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

Rhodes in the pro bowl.


So there is that


How can this be?

< Message edited by CPAMAN -- 1/21/2020 12:14:44 PM >


_____________________________

Lots of Christopher Columbus statues available on ebay.
Post #: 6112
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:15:16 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Keenum and many QBs do many similar "brain activity" Keenum does hours of VR.

Maybe research what others do so there is a basis of comparison?

I know what QBs do to feel they are getting a competitive edge, I clearly post a link above showing Brady does much of what Kirk does... That wasnt my real motive to say he does these things, its more so to understand that maybe the level he takes it isnt helping, possibly tormenting him to overthink far too much.

It is real that he is hot and cold, good Kirk and Bad Kirk, it seems to translate some to in game elements but far surpasses shitty OL play making him panic. Its something else, the dynamic alone of winning percentage playing a normal Sunday day game as compared to non regular start time games is REAL. And its not correlative to the record of W/L of team he is playing.

I have been very heavy handed and outspoken in my disdain for the Vikings signing Kirk from the start and it was heavily based on this variable that seems to dictate his play and ability to be consistant. Yes he can be a great QB and have incredible stats, make dazzling plays... But something in how ge is wired is always there ready to derail it all... Its just hard to justify that in a franchize QB and continue to go all in.

Everyone has their own opinions on Kirk Cousins. I myself dont see him as getting us to the end game.
Post #: 6113
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:24:15 PM  1 votes
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Keenum and many QBs do many similar "brain activity" Keenum does hours of VR.

Maybe research what others do so there is a basis of comparison?

I know what QBs do to feel they are getting a competitive edge, I clearly post a link above showing Brady does much of what Kirk does... That wasnt my real motive to say he does these things, its more so to understand that maybe the level he takes it isnt helping, possibly tormenting him to overthink far too much.

It is real that he is hot and cold, good Kirk and Bad Kirk, it seems to translate some to in game elements but far surpasses shitty OL play making him panic. Its something else, the dynamic alone of winning percentage playing a normal Sunday day game as compared to non regular start time games is REAL. And its not correlative to the record of W/L of team he is playing.

I have been very heavy handed and outspoken in my disdain for the Vikings signing Kirk from the start and it was heavily based on this variable that seems to dictate his play and ability to be consistant. Yes he can be a great QB and have incredible stats, make dazzling plays... But something in how ge is wired is always there ready to derail it all... Its just hard to justify that in a franchize QB and continue to go all in.

Everyone has their own opinions on Kirk Cousins. I myself dont see him as getting us to the end game.


My analysis is pretty simple. When Kirk has time - he's elite. When he doesn't - he's not. Like almost every other QB not named Mahomes and Wilson.

Blah blah "most time in nfl". It's a garbage stat since we roll out at one of the highest frequency. I would love to see how much time Cousins has/takes in straight drop back situations. We still look pretty atrocious in pass blocking in those situations.

I wanted Cousins. Still do. Kyle Shanahan mourned when they resigned Jimmy G - ending the option to sign with Cousins. McVay almost got a tampering charge he was so enthusiastic when asked about Cousins prior to him hitting the market.

I take a lot more stock in guys that have coached with him and turned Jimmy G and Goff into Superbowl starting QBs than anyone else's opinion.

To me it's upgrade the oline, another year in the system, and improve game/opponent scheming. I think we can win with Cousins.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 6114
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:25:27 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

I would be more interested in your plan moving forward.

We all know your evaluation of Kirk

My plan? Gee, lets see... does my plan even matter to our GM? well maybe he could get Tom Bradys agents number, as well as check in with free agents Tannehill and Keenum! maybe even call up ol buddy Teddy and see how things are going... Also heard that Chargers were giving up on Rivers... we know what Brees went on to do post Chargers...


Lets be real, Its Cousins and now it looks like talk of extending him as Rick looks to justify the move and create much needed cap space to even be relevant in filling holes. Last ditch effor by lame duck GM may tie us longer term to Kirk beyond said GMs tenure...


You almost made it without mentioning Cousins.

Brady maybe

Obviously we have to find a trade for our pro bowl QB

Not interested in Rivers

Tannehill is same as cousins

Teddy supposedly was upset about letting him go, so he is not likely to be back


Tannehill doesn't reach the open market. Rivers is a TO machince and couldn't rollout to save his life. Brady is going to be 44?

Its an exercise in futility. With 31M - we cant afford two high priced QBs. I guess we could trade and then sign. And revamp our offense to accommodate, just when we finally got a career year out of Cousins. But it would technically "be a plan".

Kirk has a no trade clause, and I dont see us realisticly starting anyone else than Kirk next season.

But should we then with this regime and management extend who? Should we try and extend Kirk to try for cap relief to fill holes with a lame duck coach and GM who will leave another potential fully gauranteed contract around the necks of the next HC and GM, possibly limiting the real interest in quality applicants to fill those positions in 2021? Should we extend Zimm and Rick now as well as extend Kirk for hope that next run of X years essential gets us over top? Or should we stand pat on Kirks final year as well as lame duck GM and HC and bandage a team under the cap this year clinging to hope of a draft gem.

Final situation is the wild card that would result in boom or bust but with no further commitment past 2021 for any of the components allowing for a new direction.
Post #: 6115
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:27:47 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Keenum and many QBs do similar "brain activities". Keenum does hours of VR.

Maybe research what others do so there is a basis of comparison?

It would also be interesting to know how Rags would fill the void if he found out Kirk was doing nothing to train his brain.....
Post #: 6116
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:35:28 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Keenum and many QBs do many similar "brain activity" Keenum does hours of VR.

Maybe research what others do so there is a basis of comparison?

I know what QBs do to feel they are getting a competitive edge, I clearly post a link above showing Brady does much of what Kirk does... That wasnt my real motive to say he does these things, its more so to understand that maybe the level he takes it isnt helping, possibly tormenting him to overthink far too much.

It is real that he is hot and cold, good Kirk and Bad Kirk, it seems to translate some to in game elements but far surpasses shitty OL play making him panic. Its something else, the dynamic alone of winning percentage playing a normal Sunday day game as compared to non regular start time games is REAL. And its not correlative to the record of W/L of team he is playing.

I have been very heavy handed and outspoken in my disdain for the Vikings signing Kirk from the start and it was heavily based on this variable that seems to dictate his play and ability to be consistant. Yes he can be a great QB and have incredible stats, make dazzling plays... But something in how ge is wired is always there ready to derail it all... Its just hard to justify that in a franchize QB and continue to go all in.

Everyone has their own opinions on Kirk Cousins. I myself dont see him as getting us to the end game.


My analysis is pretty simple. When Kirk has time - he's elite. When he doesn't - he's not. Like almost every other QB not named Mahomes and Wilson.

Blah blah "most time in nfl". It's a garbage stat since we roll out at one of the highest frequency. I would love to see how much time Cousins has/takes in straight drop back situations. We still look pretty atrocious in pass blocking in those situations.

I wanted Cousins. Still do. Kyle Shanahan mourned when they resigned Jimmy G - ending the option to sign with Cousins. McVay almost got a tampering charge he was so enthusiastic when asked about Cousins prior to him hitting the market.

I take a lot more stock in guys that have coached with him and turned Jimmy G and Goff into Superbowl starting QBs than anyone else's opinion.

To me it's upgrade the oline, another year in the system, and improve game/opponent scheming. I think we can win with Cousins.

I like your thoughts and totally agree on what coaches and GMs see in Cousins... he is enamoring in stats and potential.

I will say Im not sure his entire play or lack there of, decision making and bad Kirk with the grimmace doesnt directly relate to pressure of the game, whether it be OL breakdown or come back wins, end of game or overtime pressure point decision making. To a point he may be better in those situations, and as we have seen inexplicably at times especially in first quarter of games when series of plays have been planned and practiced if things go not as Kirk planned in his head prior he seems to change his persona and play. I think he plays better when he just lets it rip and doesnt overthink everything and that may come from just how he is wired.
Post #: 6117
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:38:42 PM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
i would not extend kirk. i would not extend Zim.

i would not panic if they do extend kirk

I think there is a way to get the prize with kirk, I do not think it will be BECAUSE of kirk, it might have to be a 9ers-ish type plan

get more Oline

i have said the last 3 years, this team will go as far as the Oline takes us


it will be interesting to see what happens with Defense this offseason


we do have to find a way to replace a probowl CB

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 6118
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:39:00 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

I would be more interested in your plan moving forward.

We all know your evaluation of Kirk

My plan? Gee, lets see... does my plan even matter to our GM? well maybe he could get Tom Bradys agents number, as well as check in with free agents Tannehill and Keenum! maybe even call up ol buddy Teddy and see how things are going... Also heard that Chargers were giving up on Rivers... we know what Brees went on to do post Chargers...


Lets be real, Its Cousins and now it looks like talk of extending him as Rick looks to justify the move and create much needed cap space to even be relevant in filling holes. Last ditch effor by lame duck GM may tie us longer term to Kirk beyond said GMs tenure...

Maybe it wasn't you but people are screaming for a mobile QB and you want to talk to Rivers and Brady.
Post #: 6119
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:40:48 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

i would not extend kirk. i would not extend Zim.

i would not panic if they do extend kirk

I think there is a way to get the prize with kirk, I do not think it will be BECAUSE of kirk, it might have to be a 9ers-ish type plan

get more Oline

i have said the last 3 years, this team will go as far as the Oline takes us


it will be interesting to see what happens with Defense this offseason


we do have to find a way to replace a probowl CB

Could his home state teams(Miami, Jacksonville) think they could get him back on track for a 7th rounder?
Post #: 6120
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:45:07 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

i would not extend kirk. i would not extend Zim.

i would not panic if they do extend kirk

I think there is a way to get the prize with kirk, I do not think it will be BECAUSE of kirk, it might have to be a 9ers-ish type plan

get more Oline

i have said the last 3 years, this team will go as far as the Oline takes us


it will be interesting to see what happens with Defense this offseason


we do have to find a way to replace a probowl CB


No doubt about OL and DL strengths needed...

GM and HC should be under heavy scrutiny in their final year.

Im OK (YES REALLY) with extending Kirk to more years out with a heavy prorated signing bonus and low 2020 cap number. BUT this would have to be a more traditional type NFL contract with voidable or garbage numbers at end of contract as all other QBs get. Not this fully guaranteed contract with no trade clause stuff, that is just not sustainable to this teams well being at this point. I think that will be a huge sticking point between this GM and Agent for Kirk in any deal being made this year and Kirk has shown he has no problem playing on year to year deals in his past.

AS FOR OUR PROBOWL DB... does that mean we can get more in trade for him now?
Post #: 6121
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:46:34 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12168
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

i would not extend kirk. i would not extend Zim.

i would not panic if they do extend kirk

I think there is a way to get the prize with kirk, I do not think it will be BECAUSE of kirk, it might have to be a 9ers-ish type plan

get more Oline

i have said the last 3 years, this team will go as far as the Oline takes us


it will be interesting to see what happens with Defense this offseason


we do have to find a way to replace a probowl CB


No doubt about OL and DL strengths needed...

GM and HC should be under heavy scrutiny in their final year.

Im OK (YES REALLY) with extending Kirk to more years out with a heavy prorated signing bonus and low 2020 cap number. BUT this would have to be a more traditional type NFL contract with voidable or garbage numbers at end of contract as all other QBs get. Not this fully guaranteed contract with no trade clause stuff, that is just not sustainable to this teams well being at this point. I think that will be a huge sticking point between this GM and Agent for Kirk in any deal being made this year and Kirk has shown he has no problem playing on year to year deals in his past.

AS FOR OUR PROBOWL DB... does that mean we can get more in trade for him now?

Now there is something we can all agree on.
Post #: 6122
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:54:05 PM   
drviking


Posts: 36160
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Dakota
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragnarök

quote:

ORIGINAL: drviking

i would not extend kirk. i would not extend Zim.

i would not panic if they do extend kirk

I think there is a way to get the prize with kirk, I do not think it will be BECAUSE of kirk, it might have to be a 9ers-ish type plan

get more Oline

i have said the last 3 years, this team will go as far as the Oline takes us


it will be interesting to see what happens with Defense this offseason


we do have to find a way to replace a probowl CB


No doubt about OL and DL strengths needed...

GM and HC should be under heavy scrutiny in their final year.

Im OK (YES REALLY) with extending Kirk to more years out with a heavy prorated signing bonus and low 2020 cap number. BUT this would have to be a more traditional type NFL contract with voidable or garbage numbers at end of contract as all other QBs get. Not this fully guaranteed contract with no trade clause stuff, that is just not sustainable to this teams well being at this point. I think that will be a huge sticking point between this GM and Agent for Kirk in any deal being made this year and Kirk has shown he has no problem playing on year to year deals in his past.

AS FOR OUR PROBOWL DB... does that mean we can get more in trade for him now?


it would not be a sticking point to me, IMO, he has a very defined value, and it aint top QB value, YMMV

if he needs to move on, so be it


i dont think i could handle your posts on Cousins for any sort of extension

_____________________________

"Only one thing left to do..."
Post #: 6123
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:55:52 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77938
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
Again, how does a 3 year, fully guaranteed contract differ from a "traditional" 5 year contract where only the first 3 years are guaranteed?
Post #: 6124
RE: General Vikes Talk - 1/21/2020 12:56:31 PM   
Ragnarök


Posts: 2274
Status: offline
Im not trying to be totally polorizing on Kirk, his play or his contract, but they are big issues moving forward as should be with any team... All tied directly to issue long term with GM and HC. and all encapsulating the ability to sign strengths to fill holes and be competitive moving forward. Some very tough decisions by upper management will impact this team for another half a decade potentially in next months.

As for replacement QB, Im under impression if you continue to struggle to get pro bowl level or at least upper NFL O line play you must find a QB that is at least semi mobile and can make plays off schedule. Prefer to draft a young talent and take a chance they develop. That along with signing an available known journman talent for options. That said this can not be implemented until Kirk plays out his time and is allowed to walk from our cap in 2021. Unless Im missing some magical unicorn situational out that allows us to move on from Kirk this year its all his game.

How we play our cards on these issues in offseason this year will impact all other positions and management for future.

< Message edited by Ragnarök -- 1/21/2020 1:02:27 PM >
Post #: 6125
Page:   <<   < prev  243 244 [245] 246 247   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  243 244 [245] 246 247   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode