Phil Riewer
Posts: 27443
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott quote:
ORIGINAL: David F. quote:
ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott OK, To be clear. David F is clearly making his expert analysis of Cousins based on one game. Hey David, did you know Tom Brady has had a few bad games in his career. And so did Joe Montana, and Brett Favre, and Steve Young, and Dan Marino, and Drew Brees, and Fran Tarkenton. I get it. You hate Cousins and wish he would be gone. Your hatred shows clear as day. But Cousins is our QB for this year at the very least, unless some kind of weird ass shit happens as we trade him and a draft pick or two for Russell Wilson.... Get used to it. All the youtube videos and wanton hatred isn't going to change that. I don't think Cousins is the next Rich Gannon. but adequate is a fair description, IMHO. all this shit you are posting is missing the entire point of my original post...That after Cousins, we have no depth at QB. Cousins will be OK, he's not the problem. But if he gets hurt we have the likes of Mond, Stanley and Browning on the roster. We'd be ****ed. With Cousins we have a chance. With Cousins we are not ****ed. All of your many many assumptions in this post are false. ALL of them? So...Mond, Stanley and Browning have NFL experience? Whew I guess I was wrong. We aren't ****ed if one of them has to take over the offense? How prophetic of you. Oh, I can point to one game last year that Tom Brady had a bad game....Is that assumption wrong. Did Joe Montana never have a bad game? I can point to three superbowls and suggest Tarkenton didn't always have a good game. And with this on our roster at the QB position: Cousins, Mond, Stanley, and Browning, who's going to be the QB for the most part? Yeah all my assumptions are false. I didn’t say everything you wrote was an assumption. I said you made many many of them - which you did - and they were all false. They were: thinking I didn’t know Brady and Montana and the others ever had bad days, that I hate Kirk, that I don’t know Kirk is our qb, that I don’t know who our backups are, and that I don’t know Kirk is better than Stanley and browning. You said most of his interceptions were due to pressure and/or tipped balls. I disagree and shared some clips. I also encourage you to look up football outsiders, in particular their stat where they adjust season interceptions for drops, tips, and other criteria. For 2020, they claim kirk’s ints should have been 12 instead of 13. Anything 3/1 is very good. 4/1 is All Pro Any higher is Rodgers. Cunningham 1998 Dante Culpeppers best year as Viking...2004 4717 Yards 39 TDs 11 Ints. Brett Favre 2009 33TD/7Int Kirk was exceptional for all of 2019, started off cold in 2020 but his last 10-12 games was right there. I don't see what you see....I see the best qb we have had since Randall's year, Brett Favre's year and Dante's All Pro Year and Kirk has been more consistently good--like the best QB play have had in a 3 year stretch in a long time. Not to mention his ability to stay healthy. Kirk:s 2018 30/10 2019 26/6 2020 35/13
< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 5/26/2021 4:36:35 PM >
_____________________________
SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
|