Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: 2022 NFL draft

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2022 NFL draft Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 2:54:15 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9554
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 426
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 3:18:18 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.
Post #: 427
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 3:42:49 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.
Post #: 428
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 6:01:50 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.

I think it's very bad value at 12. Interestingly, with Spielman finally gone, we could be looking at the perfect tradeback scenario with so many needs, no hole that has to be filled at 12, and potentially no gamechanger sitting there for us. This could really be a year to get more draft capital and take a player later in the first who can help. I'd prefer to stay and get a gamechanger, but there might not be a clean fit there.
Post #: 429
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 7:33:56 PM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bohumm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.

I think it's very bad value at 12. Interestingly, with Spielman finally gone, we could be looking at the perfect tradeback scenario with so many needs, no hole that has to be filled at 12, and potentially no gamechanger sitting there for us. This could really be a year to get more draft capital and take a player later in the first who can help. I'd prefer to stay and get a gamechanger, but there might not be a clean fit there.

Yeah.

Probably a trade back into the 20-25 range.
Post #: 430
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 7:38:33 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.


How far back to trade and what is the return? And while guard has been a problem since the civil war, center is acute. Not clamoring for a C in the first round, but certainly higher than the 5th. DB is acute.

Maybe a trade down for Green and say a McCreary type would be a good use of 12:

This shows Green 27th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/players/2022/kenyon-green

This shows McCreary 38th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/search?q=roger+mccreary

27 & 38 equate exactly to 12: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp
Post #: 431
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/14/2022 8:47:44 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.
Post #: 432
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 2:22:16 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9554
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 433
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 9:14:19 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.
Post #: 434
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 9:31:32 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27426
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
The CB that graded better, Stephon Gillmore, signed with the Colts for about triple what we are paying PP. 2/23

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 4/15/2022 9:35:13 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 435
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 9:55:35 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.


Dantzler v Peterson is in part about the risk/reward of Dantzler compared to the known, albeit ever declining, quantity of Peterson.

Similar to the risk/reward of Stingley vs the safe but lower ceiling McDuffie.

Would like to see Dantzler outperform Peterson by the end of this year. If not, he needs to be a backup.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 4/15/2022 9:58:28 AM >
Post #: 436
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 10:02:59 AM   
Mark Anderson

 

Posts: 12164
Joined: 9/1/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.


How far back to trade and what is the return? And while guard has been a problem since the civil war, center is acute. Not clamoring for a C in the first round, but certainly higher than the 5th. DB is acute.

Maybe a trade down for Green and say a McCreary type would be a good use of 12:

This shows Green 27th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/players/2022/kenyon-green

This shows McCreary 38th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/search?q=roger+mccreary

27 & 38 equate exactly to 12: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Green and McCreary and still having #46 would be a nice start to draft.
Post #: 437
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 10:23:29 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9554
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.



maybe, but probably more so than you or me...i wouldn't anoint him anything, but i think that danztler closed the season strong....

there was plenty of tape on breeland...zimmer knew what he had...i think starting breeland, over and over, when he was clearly over his head, and getting killed in coverage is just more evidence that zimmer was out of his mind...for whatever reason, danztler was in zimmer's dog house, and he put that before a player's ability....

imo; danztler and whatever cb we draft this year are the near-term cb future of the vikings....

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 438
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 10:29:43 AM   
Murph


Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
https://www.nfl.com/news/2022-nfl-draft-strongest-position-group-weakest

Something to keep in mind is also what positions can be adequately addressed in rounds 2-5

Looks like a draft were you can get good value after round in in these position groups:

1) Edge defender
2) Safety
3) Interior offensive line
4) Cornerback

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 439
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 11:09:07 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.



maybe, but probably more so than you or me...i wouldn't anoint him anything, but i think that danztler closed the season strong....

there was plenty of tape on breeland...zimmer knew what he had...i think starting breeland, over and over, when he was clearly over his head, and getting killed in coverage is just more evidence that zimmer was out of his mind...for whatever reason, danztler was in zimmer's dog house, and he put that before a player's ability....

imo; danztler and whatever cb we draft this year are the near-term cb future of the vikings....

I'll bend under the withering attack of your argument and go with ...

Dantzler in the competition for starter vs a first or second rd pick ... and live with whatever happens hoping for continued growth.

but I'll be mumbling under my breath if Dantzler starts game one.
Post #: 440
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 11:10:28 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.


How far back to trade and what is the return? And while guard has been a problem since the civil war, center is acute. Not clamoring for a C in the first round, but certainly higher than the 5th. DB is acute.

Maybe a trade down for Green and say a McCreary type would be a good use of 12:

This shows Green 27th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/players/2022/kenyon-green

This shows McCreary 38th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/search?q=roger+mccreary

27 & 38 equate exactly to 12: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Green and McCreary and still having #46 would be a nice start to draft.

That would be a mock fantasy come true.

Make it so!
Post #: 441
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 11:16:03 AM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9554
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.



maybe, but probably more so than you or me...i wouldn't anoint him anything, but i think that danztler closed the season strong....

there was plenty of tape on breeland...zimmer knew what he had...i think starting breeland, over and over, when he was clearly over his head, and getting killed in coverage is just more evidence that zimmer was out of his mind...for whatever reason, danztler was in zimmer's dog house, and he put that before a player's ability....

imo; danztler and whatever cb we draft this year are the near-term cb future of the vikings....

I'll bend under the withering attack of your argument and go with ...

Dantzler in the competition for starter vs a first or second rd pick ... and live with whatever happens hoping for continued growth.

but I'll be mumbling under my breath if Dantzler starts game one.



I’ll accept that, but I might just stalk you just for the hell of it….

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 442
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 11:16:20 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.


Dantzler v Peterson is in part about the risk/reward of Dantzler compared to the known, albeit ever declining, quantity of Peterson.

Similar to the risk/reward of Stingley vs the safe but lower ceiling McDuffie.

Would like to see Dantzler outperform Peterson by the end of this year. If not, he needs to be a backup.

I suppose but either player is like trying to deal with a beer hangover by waking up the next morning and popping a beer.

Purging 2021 is going to take longer than expected.
Post #: 443
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 12:51:07 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.


How far back to trade and what is the return? And while guard has been a problem since the civil war, center is acute. Not clamoring for a C in the first round, but certainly higher than the 5th. DB is acute.

Maybe a trade down for Green and say a McCreary type would be a good use of 12:

This shows Green 27th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/players/2022/kenyon-green

This shows McCreary 38th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/search?q=roger+mccreary

27 & 38 equate exactly to 12: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Green and McCreary and still having #46 would be a nice start to draft.


And amazingly the value of their overall mock positions are dead on equal to the #12 pick... fate!
Post #: 444
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 12:55:56 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Murph

https://www.nfl.com/news/2022-nfl-draft-strongest-position-group-weakest

Something to keep in mind is also what positions can be adequately addressed in rounds 2-5

Looks like a draft were you can get good value after round in in these position groups:

1) Edge defender
2) Safety
3) Interior offensive line
4) Cornerback


That dovetails nicely with our current and near term needs! Then again, most any position except OT does presuming Darrisaw is all that.

LB is also solid but is a fragile ecosystem.
Post #: 445
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 1:05:23 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 28598
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: ratoppenheimer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Todd M

DB
DB
G
DE


WR
CB
IOL
IOL

i don't like picking at #12...i'd trade back for another 2nd round pick....

we could trade our three 6th round picks and move up to #125 in the 4th, or include our 5th rounder and move up to #108 in the 4th....

i think we're going to find that we're already deep with young talent at edge/de....

CB (Defcon 1, 'cocked pistol')
C (Defcon 2, 'we need to unsheath')
S (Defcon 3, 'belligerent')

Not just because Dantzler, Bradbury, Bynum are our weakest starters but there is absolutely zilch – not even a Zimmer blacklisted no show mystery like Mond or W Davis – to fantasize about stepping in. TE is as weak / shallow also but not sure how much it will factor into our new offense.

Such a weird start to the regime, not even sure FA and the draft are hands on the same body, much less working hand in hand.

ZAD and Hicks (to a much lesser degree) are Kwesi's legitimate signings and shoe-in starters. No draft attention there.

DT Phillips, RG Reed-J Davis, CB Peterson, SCB Sullivan are hand-regime-picked probable starters, by default ... (Peterson was a hand-picked recycle). Think of Kwesi and his little pipette dropping these guys into a petri dish, hoping to culture some good hairy bacteria on top the of the baseline jelly-like Spielman stuff (from the last few drafts).

OK I went way too far there, I apologize.



I'm okay with what I've seen in dantzler ane bynum...bradbury - no....

jaylen twyman is healthy...i just noticed on a draft site that he was a +143 in terms of draft value where we selected him - that's very very good...he had 10.5 sacks as a d-tackle in 2019 - that's a better season than stingley in 2019....

for reasons i can't explain; nobody, and i mean nobody, has any faith that wyatt davis is going to bring anything to camp this summer - it's like this guy doesn't really exist - people don't even say hello to him in the hallway anymore....

Bynum looked good in limited playing time, I liked his college resume. I think its a mistake to crown him as starter without adequate competition.

Being ok with Dantzler is your prerogative, of course. By any standard, he slid backward last season. And IMO he comes across as an over-sensitive head case ... no bueno for a CB. People (not you) will blame that and everything else on Zimmer but he just didn't impress me at all.

I was excited about drafting Davis ... maybe more just to have Spielman splurge on OL ... it is very strange to use a third rd pick and completely hold them back like that. Even Mond got glimpses. Again, its easy to blame everything on Zimmer but its very possible Davis didn't show up to play.



i realize that for a CB it's about stopping the passing game, but I've heard that dantzler was #1 against the run as a CB....

2021
cameron dantzler pff grade 73.8...17/116

Patrick peterson pff grade 63.0...57/116

PFF is only slightly more accurate than cowboy nation bbq jackalope grades. I’d rather have Peterson even though he is below average, a shadow of his former self who probably graded higher than he deserved because of the negative attention Breeland was getting. You know what he is, he know’s what he is and you’ll get that steadily. Danztler is all over the place … I’m sure a part of that is youth but a good play here does not offset the really bad plays there. Undependable and no way should he be a designated starter. No way.


Dantzler v Peterson is in part about the risk/reward of Dantzler compared to the known, albeit ever declining, quantity of Peterson.

Similar to the risk/reward of Stingley vs the safe but lower ceiling McDuffie.

Would like to see Dantzler outperform Peterson by the end of this year. If not, he needs to be a backup.

I suppose but either player is like trying to deal with a beer hangover by waking up the next morning and popping a beer.

Purging 2021 is going to take longer than expected.


Yes they were part of the problem no matter how much people blame the coaching.

How long do you expect the purge to take? So far we've been oblivious to the inevitable pain as we value shop with a few new credit cards.
Post #: 446
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 1:05:44 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 13973
Status: offline
Our IOL has been a patchwork mess ever since Hutchison, Birk, Herrera…

One dumpster fire of SPACKLE and gauze, ever since.

_____________________________

**** you all.
Post #: 447
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 1:17:02 PM   
bohumm

 

Posts: 5705
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: Altadena, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark Anderson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Davis will be at camp mingling with fans and kids seeking autographs. Somebody will shout "that's Wyatt Davis" and all the kids will hide their sharpies and paper.

Twyman. 3 of his 10.5 sacks came against Ohio (not Ohio St). Still, he seems to have pass rushing skills. Squatty type, not sure where his position is.

What do you think of just drafting Kenyon Green(at #12 or a slight trade back) and finally taking care of the RG spot?

Then, draft a Center in rounds 5 or 6 and let Bradbury, Reed and rookie battle it out for Center position.


How far back to trade and what is the return? And while guard has been a problem since the civil war, center is acute. Not clamoring for a C in the first round, but certainly higher than the 5th. DB is acute.

Maybe a trade down for Green and say a McCreary type would be a good use of 12:

This shows Green 27th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/players/2022/kenyon-green

This shows McCreary 38th overall: https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/search?q=roger+mccreary

27 & 38 equate exactly to 12: https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp

Green and McCreary and still having #46 would be a nice start to draft.


And amazingly the value of their overall mock positions are dead on equal to the #12 pick... fate!

That really is a smart deal you've set up there. Not just the value and the players being good as well as realistic, but also the cross section of high-value positions populated with good prospects and positions where we could use upgrades.

Always interesting to deal with smart fans. Kudos.
Post #: 448
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/15/2022 6:01:27 PM   
Steve Lentz


Posts: 36196
Joined: 7/19/2007
From: Omaha
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

Our IOL has been a patchwork mess ever since Hutchison, Birk, Herrera…

One dumpster fire of SPACKLE and gauze, ever since.

Fortunately we have a very mobile QB.

_____________________________

" I believe empathy is the most essential quality of civilization"
Post #: 449
RE: 2022 NFL draft - 4/16/2022 8:43:21 AM   
Murph


Posts: 2026
Joined: 4/20/2008
From: PNW
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

Our IOL has been a patchwork mess ever since Hutchison, Birk, Herrera…

One dumpster fire of SPACKLE and gauze, ever since.



Maybe karma for the poison pill we put into Hutchison's contract?

I'd think that we've paid our dues by now?

_____________________________

Hey Wilf's, let's build a "Perennial Super Bowl contender" not a "perennial playoff contender".
Post #: 450
Page:   <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: 2022 NFL draft Page: <<   < prev  16 17 [18] 19 20   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode