Phil Riewer
Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H quote:
ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer quote:
ORIGINAL: Brad H 10 biggest contracts in the NFL this season: 1) Aaron Rodgers (didn't live up to it) 2) Russell Wilson (didn't live up to it) 3) Kyler Murray (didn't live up to it) 4) Deshaun Watson (didn't live up to it) 5) Patrick Mahomes 6) Josh Allen 7) Derek Carr (didn't live up to it) 8) Dak Prescott (didn't live up to it) 9) Matthew Stafford (didn't live up to it) 10) Kirk Cousins (with the #14 QB rating, didn't live up to it) Anyone seeing a trend here? Again it is a double edge sword. You have 5-7 wins w/o Kirk. Next season you could have 5-7 wins with Kirk. This season was a complete anomaly. Again it can't be done so it itsn't a solution.....you know it everyone knows it. I haven't heard your solution. Please, I'm all ears. I have posted many posts on what to do. Rebuild the defense. Cut/trade Thielen, Kendricks, Hicks, Harry, Cook to start. Draft Purdue O'Connell in the 4th or 5th. Spend all FA and almost all trade capital on defense. Of the players you listed, only Kendricks has trade value. Maybe you get a fourth or fifth rounder for Thielen. A rookie QB from Purdue in the 4-5 round is a long-term solution at QB? That's interesting. Spend all FA money on defense? What if your two offensive tackles go down in training camp? Sure, all of those things could turn out to be golden, but on the flip side it sounds like a potential train wreck to me. You gain 14.5 million in cap by cutting Kendricks and Hicks if you can't trade them. You gain 8 million by cutting Cooks. You gain 8 million by cutting Harry. You gain 6.5 by cutting Thielen. Look at Sportrac and get back to me. That would add 38 million to the books right there. Add a couple pieces to the offense and restructure a couple other contracts (TJ and JJeff) and you would still have money to spend. Kendricks is the best player we have on defense. He's the only guy living up to his contract. And yet, you want to cut Kendricks. Logic be damned. He can't cover a rb any more and is on the other side of 30...we could restructure him but your trolling solution on Kirk isn't a solution. You want to cut Kirk and keep the 30 year olds on defense? Talk about Sabotage.
_____________________________
SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
|