Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talkk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talkk Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/21/2025 2:42:55 PM   
timz

 

Posts: 520
Joined: 11/15/2007
Status: offline
My two cents, it's all it's worth. I'm hearing a lot from friends "so and so sat for a year or two before he played why not let JJ sit?" Simple answer he was not drafted tenth overall to sit, he was to lead this team. Got hurt the first year but was anointed the starter in this years preseason and some QB's that are playing pretty well elsewhere were let go or passed on. The disappointment is easy to understand because he hasn't lived up to all the hype surrounding his draft.
Post #: 751
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/21/2025 3:15:12 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30125
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: timz
My two cents, it's all it's worth. I'm hearing a lot from friends "so and so sat for a year or two before he played why not let JJ sit?" Simple answer he was not drafted tenth overall to sit, he was to lead this team. Got hurt the first year but was anointed the starter in this years preseason and some QB's that are playing pretty well elsewhere were let go or passed on. The disappointment is easy to understand because he hasn't lived up to all the hype surrounding his draft.


TBH I wouldn't mind JJ sitting a week or two more; Id rather see Brosmer than Wentz though.
I compare it to the SF 49ers when they drafted Lance a few years ago. It ended up that the 7th rounder was the better QB.
We have another year or two of the cheap QBs but we have to find out by year end if they have it. Otherwise it is a shit design.....still the main reason we wanted Jones over Darnold. It being the intangibles to win in playoff/elimination time.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/21/2025 3:17:13 PM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 752
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/21/2025 4:11:02 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20769
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: timz
My two cents, it's all it's worth. I'm hearing a lot from friends "so and so sat for a year or two before he played why not let JJ sit?" Simple answer he was not drafted tenth overall to sit, he was to lead this team. Got hurt the first year but was anointed the starter in this years preseason and some QB's that are playing pretty well elsewhere were let go or passed on. The disappointment is easy to understand because he hasn't lived up to all the hype surrounding his draft.


TBH I wouldn't mind JJ sitting a week or two more; Id rather see Brosmer than Wentz though.
I compare it to the SF 49ers when they drafted Lance a few years ago. It ended up that the 7th rounder was the better QB.
We have another year or two of the cheap QBs but we have to find out by year end if they have it. Otherwise it is a shit design.....still the main reason we wanted Jones over Darnold. It being the intangibles to win in playoff/elimination time.

Good points Phil. đŸ‘đŸ»
Post #: 753
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/21/2025 4:43:14 PM   
Steve Lentz


Posts: 36305
Joined: 7/19/2007
From: Omaha
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

If other GMs looked at the team in an unbiased manner, what position group would they say offers the most potential for the mid-term, i.e. the next 2-4 years?

WR is the obvious call, although when Let's Get Paid does get paid that will be a lot of coin for he and Jefferson.

I would say the young late round/undrafted group at DL offers some hope, however little.

Oh, maybe Darrisaw and Jackson... so 2/5ths of an OL.


The cupboards are stocked but the expensive food is expired and pretty lousy.

You gotta have a good quarterback to win. We don't have one, period. Our best option right now is Carson Wentz, who is a below average quarterback. He takes almost no risks and his better days are behind him. JJ McCarthy is stealing money. He'll be out of the league in 3-4 years.


After Darnold's multi-game shit show when the pressure was on, I was happy we didn't give him the big bucks so he could choke some more.

Because of course, losing to Philly last year and the Rams was a total surprise, right? The guy went 14-3, largely without Darrisaw and the worst interior o-line ever assembled. I'll take that every season I am alive from now until death and be very happy. At least I had hope.

How quickly people forget just how bad that offensive line was in front of Darnold last year.


I haven't! I would also be happy to have Bradford over anything we've seen so far.

_____________________________

" I believe empathy is the most essential quality of civilization"
Post #: 754
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/21/2025 5:00:15 PM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30125
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Steve Lentz

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

If other GMs looked at the team in an unbiased manner, what position group would they say offers the most potential for the mid-term, i.e. the next 2-4 years?

WR is the obvious call, although when Let's Get Paid does get paid that will be a lot of coin for he and Jefferson.

I would say the young late round/undrafted group at DL offers some hope, however little.

Oh, maybe Darrisaw and Jackson... so 2/5ths of an OL.


The cupboards are stocked but the expensive food is expired and pretty lousy.

You gotta have a good quarterback to win. We don't have one, period. Our best option right now is Carson Wentz, who is a below average quarterback. He takes almost no risks and his better days are behind him. JJ McCarthy is stealing money. He'll be out of the league in 3-4 years.


After Darnold's multi-game shit show when the pressure was on, I was happy we didn't give him the big bucks so he could choke some more.

Because of course, losing to Philly last year and the Rams was a total surprise, right? The guy went 14-3, largely without Darrisaw and the worst interior o-line ever assembled. I'll take that every season I am alive from now until death and be very happy. At least I had hope.

How quickly people forget just how bad that offensive line was in front of Darnold last year.


I haven't! I would also be happy to have Bradford over anything we've seen so far.


If Bradford was healthy (or healthier) we wouldn't have been able to trade for him.....

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 755
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/21/2025 7:45:32 PM   
marty


Posts: 13486
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I don't quite understand why Brosmer would "likely be a major downgrade for Justin Jefferson and the rest of the Minnesota pass catchers against a solid Chargers secondary."

It's possible, but it's also possible Brosmer does all right having weapons like JJ and Addison against a Charger 2ndary that just gave up 5 TDs to Matthew Stafford.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 756
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 7:47:45 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30125
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I don't quite understand why Brosmer would "likely be a major downgrade for Justin Jefferson and the rest of the Minnesota pass catchers against a solid Chargers secondary."

It's possible, but it's also possible Brosmer does all right having weapons like JJ and Addison against a Charger 2ndary that just gave up 5 TDs to Matthew Stafford.


I don't think he knows the check downs for blocking as JJ and Wentz got all the snaps in practice....it could work like when Dobbs was QB where KOC calls the checks up till 10 seconds on the clock.

< Message edited by Phil Riewer -- 10/22/2025 7:51:06 AM >


_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 757
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 9:22:39 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 40336
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I don't quite understand why Brosmer would "likely be a major downgrade for Justin Jefferson and the rest of the Minnesota pass catchers against a solid Chargers secondary."

It's possible, but it's also possible Brosmer does all right having weapons like JJ and Addison against a Charger 2ndary that just gave up 5 TDs to Matthew Stafford.



You do see the error in your logic here, don't you?

Stafford >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Brosmer.

Stafford is a QB destined for the HOF. Brosmer is an undrafted rookie with about 6 snaps in two appearances.

That is a really dumb comparison.

I like Brosmer a lot, He has skills that may be good, but he is NOT some savior in waiting. There is a reason he went undrafted.

_____________________________

Come to America, I bought one President and got the entire Republican Party for FREE - Vladimir Putin
Post #: 758
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 9:37:01 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24330
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
The latest from Kevin Seifert:

Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell said J.J. McCarthy (ankle) doesn’t need to be “130 percent” to see game action.
A month and a half after McCarthy injured his ankle and a month after he shed his walking boot, O’Connell is still speaking indirectly about how McCarthy might get back on the field in 2025. He said Tuesday that the QB has to be able to “do his job for 60 minutes without having any setbacks” before he’s under center again. When that might be is anyone’s guess as the Vikings play rhetorical games with McCarthy’s status after his abysmal start to the season. Carson Wentz (shoulder) is expected to start the team’s Week 8 game against the Chargers, and Max Brosmer is expected to serve as the backup.




This whole thing is getting weirder by the day. I'm telling you, he ain't hurt!

< Message edited by Brad H -- 10/22/2025 9:38:10 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 759
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 9:41:34 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 40336
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

The latest from Kevin Seifert:

Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell said J.J. McCarthy (ankle) doesn’t need to be “130 percent” to see game action.
A month and a half after McCarthy injured his ankle and a month after he shed his walking boot, O’Connell is still speaking indirectly about how McCarthy might get back on the field in 2025. He said Tuesday that the QB has to be able to “do his job for 60 minutes without having any setbacks” before he’s under center again. When that might be is anyone’s guess as the Vikings play rhetorical games with McCarthy’s status after his abysmal start to the season. Carson Wentz (shoulder) is expected to start the team’s Week 8 game against the Chargers, and Max Brosmer is expected to serve as the backup.




This whole thing is getting weirder by the day. I'm telling you, he ain't hurt!




yeah Brad, we heard you the first 983 times you suggested that. and this is how most of us react when we see it yet again.

_____________________________

Come to America, I bought one President and got the entire Republican Party for FREE - Vladimir Putin
Post #: 760
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 9:49:08 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 24330
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
Anybody else starting to think McCarthy isn't hurt? Honest answers please. Stick to the subject.

Those that don't answer are more-or-less admitting they agree with me.

< Message edited by Brad H -- 10/22/2025 9:59:52 AM >


_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 761
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 9:56:52 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 30125
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H
Anybody else starting to think McCarthy isn't hurt? Honest answers please. Stick to the subject.


No....and again why would it matter to anyone but you?

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 762
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 10:37:49 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 40336
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Anybody else starting to think McCarthy isn't hurt? Honest answers please. Stick to the subject.

Those that don't answer are more-or-less admitting they agree with me.



1. Enough with your conspiracy theory
2. Not answering a ridiculous question is not admitting they agree with you. That's utter nonsense. They could be completely indifferent to you argument. they could feel it isn't worth their time to respond. Pure unadulterated nonsense to claim people who do not respond agree with you.

_____________________________

Come to America, I bought one President and got the entire Republican Party for FREE - Vladimir Putin
Post #: 763
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 12:35:40 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31139
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Anybody else starting to think McCarthy isn't hurt? Honest answers please. Stick to the subject.

Those that don't answer are more-or-less admitting they agree with me.


How do you feel about basically hijacking the thread?

I'd create a Darnold thread for you but it's obvious you seek attention and since this happens to be the main Vikings thread you wouldn't use it.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 10/22/2025 12:38:12 PM >
Post #: 764
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 12:45:09 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31139
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brad H

Anybody else starting to think McCarthy isn't hurt? Honest answers please. Stick to the subject.

Those that don't answer are more-or-less admitting they agree with me.



1. Enough with your conspiracy theory
2. Not answering a ridiculous question is not admitting they agree with you. That's utter nonsense. They could be completely indifferent to you argument. they could feel it isn't worth their time to respond. Pure unadulterated nonsense to claim people who do not respond agree with you.


So if nobody answers then in Brad's mind everyone agrees with him. Which by default in his mind suggests people are saying he is right! Which he said is required in order to drop the subject!! This charade may be ending soon!!!

Ah shit... that was his requirement for Darnold not JJM's injury. Nevermind.
Post #: 765
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 6:25:10 PM   
marty


Posts: 13486
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

Stafford >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Brosmer.

Stafford is a QB destined for the HOF. Brosmer is an undrafted rookie with about 6 snaps in two appearances.

That is a really dumb comparison.

I like Brosmer a lot, He has skills that may be good, but he is NOT some savior in waiting. There is a reason he went undrafted.


Yes, that is a dumb comparison, it was not the comparison I was making.

Phil, understood the comparison was between Wentz and Brosmer in the Vikings system. And Phil made a good point that Brosmer wouldn't know the check downs like Wentz. Agreed, but Brosmer making better reads and throws, and better decisions in the pocket, might offset some of that, and lead to a productive day for the offense.

My point regarding Stafford getting 5 TDs on that 2ndary just a few days ago, means it can be beat with good passing decisions and throws.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 766
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 6:45:58 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 15568
Status: offline
Chargers are going to eat Carson Wentz, with sack dipping sauce, as his ducks flutter in the wind.

Wonder what the odds are for another pick six
?
Post #: 767
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 7:18:50 PM   
marty


Posts: 13486
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
"The odds of Carson Wentz throwing an interception against the Chargers are approximately +108 (for over half an interception) and -135 (for over one interception), according to different sportsbooks. This suggests a slightly better than 50% chance of him throwing at least one interception.

You can't get official odds for a specific play like a pick-six, but analysis of Carson Wentz's recent performance suggests a heightened risk. Here's a breakdown based on his past play and the upcoming matchup against the Los Angeles Chargers: "

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 768
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 10:08:18 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 6118
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty


Stafford >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Brosmer.

Stafford is a QB destined for the HOF. Brosmer is an undrafted rookie with about 6 snaps in two appearances.

That is a really dumb comparison.

I like Brosmer a lot, He has skills that may be good, but he is NOT some savior in waiting. There is a reason he went undrafted.


Yes, that is a dumb comparison, it was not the comparison I was making.

Phil, understood the comparison was between Wentz and Brosmer in the Vikings system. And Phil made a good point that Brosmer wouldn't know the check downs like Wentz. Agreed, but Brosmer making better reads and throws, and better decisions in the pocket, might offset some of that, and lead to a productive day for the offense.

My point regarding Stafford getting 5 TDs on that 2ndary just a few days ago, means it can be beat with good passing decisions and throws.

You should have stopped at, 'Yes that is a dumb comparison,' and moved on.

Saying that if Brosmer can make better reads, decisions, and throws than Wentz, we'll beat the Chargers ... is still circling back to a silly comparison between what unproven Brosmer might do and with what proven Stafford did.

There is nothing to suggest that Brosmer is anywhere near being ready for that. Cam Akers has a better track record.

Just once I'd like to see you going in the opposite direction from a lame argument, instead of doubling-down:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RKLXnY5920o
Post #: 769
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/22/2025 11:36:12 PM   
marty


Posts: 13486
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Tom, I didn't stop at that being a dumb comparison, because that was not the comparison I was making. Phil understood that, you are apparently another person who doesn't understand that.

I said nothing about the Vikings beating the Chargers. It sounds like your argument is that nobody can make better decisions or better than throws than what Wentz has been making, even Wentz would agree he can do better in those areas.

Just because a QB has no NFL game experience, doesn't mean that he can't play well right away. They don't all play like Jared Hall, or like JJ''s 1st 3 quarters in Chicago. There are guys that play pretty well out of the gate, and it could happen with all the weapons and good coaches in Minnesota. Daniels and Nix played pretty well right away last year, Dart isn't doing too bad this year.

Brosmer playing well in the preseason is what suggests it's possible it carries over into the regular season, we never really know if any player is ready until they actually play.

I think Wentz is going to play, and that he will bounce back with a decent night, the Vikings should at least be competitive in this one, and I am starting Wentz as a flex player on my fantasy football team, as Stafford is on a bye, and there isn't much else out there.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 770
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/23/2025 8:00:21 AM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 6118
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
I would actually love to see Brosmer get some playing time under his belt 
 Wentz is nothing more than temporary filler for a team on the edge of the precipice.

While we finish cloning and regrowing JJs ankle tissue in the lab.

What Stafford did against the Chargers - your dumb statement - has no bearing on what Brosmer will do against the Chargers.

‘Anything can Happen!’ ‘Maybe Brosmer is the next Purdy!’

Whatever dude.

By helping Cousins and Darnold play much better than previously, KOC has shown a knack for reclamation and remolding. Has he done anything yet developing fresh material?
Post #: 771
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/23/2025 9:20:19 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31139
Status: offline
Thielen so far, 5 catches for 47 yards.

The Vikings sent a 2026 fifth-round pick and a 2027 fourth-round pick to the Panthers, who, in return, traded Thielen along with a conditional 2026 seventh-round pick and a 2027 fifth-round pick. Thielen, a native of Minnesota, played the first 10 seasons of his career with the Vikings before signing with the Panthers as a free agent in 2023.

Basically Kwesi threw away a 4th. As I said, draft picks are his kryptonite.
Post #: 772
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/23/2025 10:12:41 AM   
Trekgeekscott


Posts: 40336
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: United Federation of Planets
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Thielen so far, 5 catches for 47 yards.

The Vikings sent a 2026 fifth-round pick and a 2027 fourth-round pick to the Panthers, who, in return, traded Thielen along with a conditional 2026 seventh-round pick and a 2027 fifth-round pick. Thielen, a native of Minnesota, played the first 10 seasons of his career with the Vikings before signing with the Panthers as a free agent in 2023.

Basically Kwesi threw away a 4th. As I said, draft picks are his kryptonite.


the precipitous drop in production isn't hard to understand. He is older now, but was still pretty productive when healthy the last two years. Now, age, combined with his position on the depth chart below JJ, Addison and Speedy....well, he's probably retiring after this season anyway....but I would have liked more production out of him. but with the aforementioned WRs, TJ Hockenson, Josh Oliver, and RBs out of the backfield if his age is keeping him from getting more open like he used to...it's easy to see why he's not putting up the numbers.

_____________________________

Come to America, I bought one President and got the entire Republican Party for FREE - Vladimir Putin
Post #: 773
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/23/2025 10:29:03 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31139
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trekgeekscott

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

Thielen so far, 5 catches for 47 yards.

The Vikings sent a 2026 fifth-round pick and a 2027 fourth-round pick to the Panthers, who, in return, traded Thielen along with a conditional 2026 seventh-round pick and a 2027 fifth-round pick. Thielen, a native of Minnesota, played the first 10 seasons of his career with the Vikings before signing with the Panthers as a free agent in 2023.

Basically Kwesi threw away a 4th. As I said, draft picks are his kryptonite.


the precipitous drop in production isn't hard to understand. He is older now, but was still pretty productive when healthy the last two years. Now, age, combined with his position on the depth chart below JJ, Addison and Speedy....well, he's probably retiring after this season anyway....but I would have liked more production out of him. but with the aforementioned WRs, TJ Hockenson, Josh Oliver, and RBs out of the backfield if his age is keeping him from getting more open like he used to...it's easy to see why he's not putting up the numbers.


Of course. I'd say he was brought in to supposedly salvage the offense when Let's Get Paid was suspended. A panic move based on the net result of sending out a 4th. In those three games he had 26 yards. Uber fail.
Post #: 774
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 10/23/2025 11:14:19 AM   
marty


Posts: 13486
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

What Stafford did against the Chargers - your dumb statement - has no bearing on what Brosmer will do against the Chargers.


Tom, I don't know if you're just being stupid, or if you don't play any fantasy football and understand how the knowledgeable people try to project how players might do in certain matchups. It's not a certainty, it's how you get a rough estimate or projection.

I wasn't saying Brosmer was guaranteed in his first start to equal in San Diego what Stafford just accomplished on a neutral field, I will not let you twist my words to mean something else.

I will put it more simply: San Diego isn't necessarily a defensive juggernaut, there may be ways to pass on them. If Stafford just got 5 TDs on their 2ndary, it's possible Brosmer can get a couple of TDs through the air, he does have both his #1 and #2 WRs (Stafford didn't have his #1), and if the Vikings run game is effective, the Vikings could be in a position to pull an upset.

Do I think that will happen ? No. It sounds like Wentz is starting, so a slow start is likely, hopefully Wentz can keep the Vikings within range by not playing too awful, along with Flores slowing SD down a little bit.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 775
Page:   <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talkk Page: <<   < prev  29 30 [31] 32 33   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode