Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talkk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: Rob Viking, nfrosty
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talkk Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:38:41 PM   
marty


Posts: 13585
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
McCarthy looks to me like he might have what it takes, but similar to Anthony Richardson, he is really raw as far as the number and types of throws he has made.

McCarthy seems effective in the 4th quarter, where rockets are usually needed, and the WRs will usually hang on to those passes in a close game. But earlier in the game, he needs to learn to take something off of certain throws, have the proper arc, and lead the WR on certain throws, things that Tom Brady talked about during the telecast.

KOC works well with pocket passers, until those pocket passers go up against defenses that might require them going off script (which Darnold struggled with today). Either KOC doesn't want McCarthy running on occasion to keep defenses honest, or McCarthy is choosing to stick to the play drawn up, choosing not to go off script.

Chicago won the time of possession, mostly because Ben Johnson had Caleb dinking and dunking, or running the ball a lot, usually setting him up with very safe throws, or because Caleb is quick enough to go off script and either avoid the rush, or run for a 1st down.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 1276
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:40:08 PM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 390
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
I'm sorry, but all this Payton Manning, Josh Allen non-sense is just that non-sense.

The reality is most QBs fail at the QB position. it is incredibly hard. Those guy talents were completely different. Manning was one of the most prolific college passers of all time. Josh Allen did not take football seriously until he was in college.

JJ McCarthy played on a team with an elite D and running game, and threw the ball very little
There were all sorts of questions on his ability to throw on the NFL level. He was not a unanimous 1st round talent. Vies were very mixed on him.

He performed relatively well at the combine, which I think comforted some folks on his actual talent.

My problem, is he is like a ball of clay, he was easily the most unrefined of all the QBs taken. Not sure why they thought they could win in his first year of starting.
They have not cleaned up really anything with him.
He seems very uncomfortable in the pocket, for some reason like to take a short hop forward before he throws causing all sorts of accuracy issues.
I thought it was worth the pick because you just gotta have that franchise QB, but there are some real red flags right now.
Post #: 1277
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:42:33 PM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 390
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
I'm still amazed they don't use JJ like Peyton uses Nix, of roll outs and short easy throws.

They cover up some of his deficiencies, KOC covers up none of JJs.

KOC says they gotta see what they got, but he loses his confidence, good luck
Post #: 1278
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:43:49 PM   
marty


Posts: 13585
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
I think the Bears' big return would have been less likely if the Vikings had run the ball on the 1st down, and gotten their TD with 25 seconds, or 15 seconds left. The momentun would have felt differently, and I think the Vikings would have done a better job of covering the return, or even kicking it out of the end zone.

And it's also possible the Bears don't even have a chance for a return, had the Vikings run the ball the play right after the Nailor 1st down. I think the Bears likely would have stopped the Vikings a couple of times, but it was 4 down territory, and the Vikings would have found a way to get a TD.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 1279
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:45:52 PM   
marty


Posts: 13585
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Yes, KOC doesn't seem to do a QB that has speed and mobility any favors.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 1280
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:46:32 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2526
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

I'm still amazed they don't use JJ like Peyton uses Nix, of roll outs and short easy throws.

They cover up some of his deficiencies, KOC covers up none of JJs.

KOC says they gotta see what they got, but he loses his confidence, good luck


I think it's because Nix's strong suit is quick game.

JJM's supposedly is/was medium middle of the field passes.
KOC may be calling a game suited to JJM's "strengths"... which is doubly concerning.
I had a LOT of issues with playcalling against the Ravens.
I thought KOC called a really good game today.
Post #: 1281
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:47:23 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

I'm sorry, but all this Payton Manning, Josh Allen non-sense is just that non-sense.

The reality is most QBs fail at the QB position. it is incredibly hard. Those guy talents were completely different. Manning was one of the most prolific college passers of all time. Josh Allen did not take football seriously until he was in college.

JJ McCarthy played on a team with an elite D and running game, and threw the ball very little
There were all sorts of questions on his ability to throw on the NFL level. He was not a unanimous 1st round talent. Vies were very mixed on him.

He performed relatively well at the combine, which I think comforted some folks on his actual talent.

My problem, is he is like a ball of clay, he was easily the most unrefined of all the QBs taken. Not sure why they thought they could win in his first year of starting.
They have not cleaned up really anything with him.
He seems very uncomfortable in the pocket, for some reason like to take a short hop forward before he throws causing all sorts of accuracy issues.
I thought it was worth the pick because you just gotta have that franchise QB, but there are some real red flags right now.


Where was the Josh Allen, Peyton Manning talk?
Post #: 1282
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:48:06 PM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 390
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
10 draft picks next year, some vets gonna be gone after this year, but man, I don't feel good about KAM and Grigson with this thing.

This year was just a massive mis-management of things, and overestimate of JJ being ready to play QB in the NFL

Absolute joke that Hockensen is getting McBride/Kittle money.
Should have almost been a fire-able offense to give him that contract.

Watch some of these teams, we must have the slowest S group in the NFL
Lordy, get some speed back there.
Post #: 1283
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:48:47 PM  1 votes
beo

 

Posts: 2526
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I think the Bears' big return would have been less likely if the Vikings had run the ball on the 1st down, and gotten their TD with 25 seconds, or 15 seconds left. The momentun would have felt differently, and I think the Vikings would have done a better job of covering the return, or even kicking it out of the end zone.

And it's also possible the Bears don't even have a chance for a return, had the Vikings run the ball the play right after the Nailor 1st down. I think the Bears likely would have stopped the Vikings a couple of times, but it was 4 down territory, and the Vikings would have found a way to get a TD.


The idea that you are going to script run,run,run and then pass for TD with the way JJM had been playing is fantasy.

They scored.
They needed special teams to do their job.
Didn't happen.
Post #: 1284
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:49:21 PM   
Arlowe84

 

Posts: 390
Joined: 9/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

I'm sorry, but all this Payton Manning, Josh Allen non-sense is just that non-sense.

The reality is most QBs fail at the QB position. it is incredibly hard. Those guy talents were completely different. Manning was one of the most prolific college passers of all time. Josh Allen did not take football seriously until he was in college.

JJ McCarthy played on a team with an elite D and running game, and threw the ball very little
There were all sorts of questions on his ability to throw on the NFL level. He was not a unanimous 1st round talent. Vies were very mixed on him.

He performed relatively well at the combine, which I think comforted some folks on his actual talent.

My problem, is he is like a ball of clay, he was easily the most unrefined of all the QBs taken. Not sure why they thought they could win in his first year of starting.
They have not cleaned up really anything with him.
He seems very uncomfortable in the pocket, for some reason like to take a short hop forward before he throws causing all sorts of accuracy issues.
I thought it was worth the pick because you just gotta have that franchise QB, but there are some real red flags right now.


Where was the Josh Allen, Peyton Manning talk?


All over social media, peoples best argument for letting a QB "develop"
Post #: 1285
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:52:24 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2526
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

I'm sorry, but all this Payton Manning, Josh Allen non-sense is just that non-sense.

The reality is most QBs fail at the QB position. it is incredibly hard. Those guy talents were completely different. Manning was one of the most prolific college passers of all time. Josh Allen did not take football seriously until he was in college.

JJ McCarthy played on a team with an elite D and running game, and threw the ball very little
There were all sorts of questions on his ability to throw on the NFL level. He was not a unanimous 1st round talent. Vies were very mixed on him.

He performed relatively well at the combine, which I think comforted some folks on his actual talent.

My problem, is he is like a ball of clay, he was easily the most unrefined of all the QBs taken. Not sure why they thought they could win in his first year of starting.
They have not cleaned up really anything with him.
He seems very uncomfortable in the pocket, for some reason like to take a short hop forward before he throws causing all sorts of accuracy issues.
I thought it was worth the pick because you just gotta have that franchise QB, but there are some real red flags right now.


Where was the Josh Allen, Peyton Manning talk?


All over social media, peoples best argument for letting a QB "develop"


Josh Allen, Peyton Manning... yeah probably nonesense.

But Darnold/Bo Nix... you would have swore both those guys had no chance of becoming good QBs in their first 1/2 dozen games.

So it's hard to say.
Post #: 1286
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:53:33 PM  2 votes
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
So in his first high-leverage game (to borrow a baseball term) this year, the great Sam Darnold throws 0 TDs and 4 Ints?

LMFAO. As bad as the last two high-leverage games before that!

The 1000 yard stare, updated from Vietnam when real bullets were flying.

Choke artist personified. Smart Seahawks fans are saying, yep, par for the course.

Brad and his 14-3 (aka 0-2). Mr. QB Stats. Totally ignores the "IT" factor for the singularly most important position in team sports worldwide. Anyone with a shred of football knowledge would see that.
Post #: 1287
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:54:29 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arlowe84

I'm sorry, but all this Payton Manning, Josh Allen non-sense is just that non-sense.

The reality is most QBs fail at the QB position. it is incredibly hard. Those guy talents were completely different. Manning was one of the most prolific college passers of all time. Josh Allen did not take football seriously until he was in college.

JJ McCarthy played on a team with an elite D and running game, and threw the ball very little
There were all sorts of questions on his ability to throw on the NFL level. He was not a unanimous 1st round talent. Vies were very mixed on him.

He performed relatively well at the combine, which I think comforted some folks on his actual talent.

My problem, is he is like a ball of clay, he was easily the most unrefined of all the QBs taken. Not sure why they thought they could win in his first year of starting.
They have not cleaned up really anything with him.
He seems very uncomfortable in the pocket, for some reason like to take a short hop forward before he throws causing all sorts of accuracy issues.
I thought it was worth the pick because you just gotta have that franchise QB, but there are some real red flags right now.


Where was the Josh Allen, Peyton Manning talk?


All over social media, peoples best argument for letting a QB "develop"



Ah, social media. Thanks.
Post #: 1288
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 7:58:48 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
1-5

Darnold's TD to Int ratio in his last three important games
Post #: 1289
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 8:08:42 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
A good comment from a Seattle fan: Darnold was MVP today (MVP for the Rams, that is).

Anyway, Vikings fans (which is not everyone here) have to wonder about their rookie QB.
Post #: 1290
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 8:13:02 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 15746
Status: offline
Where the **** is 14-3 boy, when his waifu pillow QB throws four interceptions and zero touchdowns, against the RAMS, again?

Jalen Hurtz looks like shit too..
Post #: 1291
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 8:14:30 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 15746
Status: offline
Hurtz accuracy is bad tonight too.. overthrow, wide right and wide right on three straight throws, after their D gets a turnover on downs..
Post #: 1292
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 8:54:25 PM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: beo

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

I think the Bears' big return would have been less likely if the Vikings had run the ball on the 1st down, and gotten their TD with 25 seconds, or 15 seconds left. The momentun would have felt differently, and I think the Vikings would have done a better job of covering the return, or even kicking it out of the end zone.

And it's also possible the Bears don't even have a chance for a return, had the Vikings run the ball the play right after the Nailor 1st down. I think the Bears likely would have stopped the Vikings a couple of times, but it was 4 down territory, and the Vikings would have found a way to get a TD.


The idea that you are going to script run,run,run and then pass for TD with the way JJM had been playing is fantasy.

They scored.
They needed special teams to do their job.
Didn't happen.


Well said. Script? Time a touchdown? LOL!
Post #: 1293
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 9:14:17 PM   
marty


Posts: 13585
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
14-3 had the 1st 4 scoring drives go for a FG, threw 4 INTs, but had the team in a position to win with 3 points.

1st 4 drives for 3 points, 1-4-3: 14-3.

4 INTs, but 3 points away, 61 yards away. So 3 points away, despite 4 Is : 3-4I, which is 14-3 backwards.

The numbers mean something, there is something in the numbers.

_____________________________

SKOL to the BOWL !!!
Post #: 1294
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 9:17:10 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20817
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

14-3 had the 1st 4 scoring drives go for a FG, threw 4 INTs, but had the team in a position to win with 3 points.

1st 4 drives for 3 points, 1-4-3: 14-3.

4 INTs, but 3 points away, 61 yards away. So 3 points away, despite 4 Is : 3-4I, which is 14-3 backwards.

The numbers mean something, there is something in the numbers.

Darnold isn't taking anyone to the promised land. Is he better than JJ? Sure. So what. I'd like this team to have an actual franchise qb one day.
Post #: 1295
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 10:28:16 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 15746
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

14-3 had the 1st 4 scoring drives go for a FG, threw 4 INTs, but had the team in a position to win with 3 points.

1st 4 drives for 3 points, 1-4-3: 14-3.

4 INTs, but 3 points away, 61 yards away. So 3 points away, despite 4 Is : 3-4I, which is 14-3 backwards.

The numbers mean something, there is something in the numbers.

Darnold isn't taking anyone to the promised land. Is he better than JJ? Sure. So what. I'd like this team to have an actual franchise qb one day.
. It’s been 5 games..

I’m fine with him learning things like touch, passing lanes, moving in the pocket and running when he can..

He is ****ing 22..

When I was 22, I was a “ in excess of 400 feet”, undef water.. give or take.. and hated it..

I’m not seeing ponder in JJM at all..

Ponder was a pansy who couldn’t lead..

JjM is a kid with heart and desire..

If ST had done their fn job, he could well have had a CFB win that would have been a good offset for his jitters and outright bad throws..

To pretend his throws are trash is bias..

Gerald Goff has been horrible tonight in crunch time and on ALL his passes..

Shit happens.


JJM is our future..

Deal with it.

Dump Thielen, smith , Jones, Hockenson and keep drafting OL players like Jackson..

Nailor is money for his cost.
Post #: 1296
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 10:32:12 PM   
Daniel Lee Young

 

Posts: 15746
Status: offline
Down go the lions…
Post #: 1297
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/16/2025 11:44:30 PM   
Richard Neussendorfer

 

Posts: 20817
Joined: 12/7/2007
From: Alamogordo, NM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

14-3 had the 1st 4 scoring drives go for a FG, threw 4 INTs, but had the team in a position to win with 3 points.

1st 4 drives for 3 points, 1-4-3: 14-3.

4 INTs, but 3 points away, 61 yards away. So 3 points away, despite 4 Is : 3-4I, which is 14-3 backwards.

The numbers mean something, there is something in the numbers.

Darnold isn't taking anyone to the promised land. Is he better than JJ? Sure. So what. I'd like this team to have an actual franchise qb one day.
. It’s been 5 games..

I’m fine with him learning things like touch, passing lanes, moving in the pocket and running when he can..

He is ****ing 22..

When I was 22, I was a “ in excess of 400 feet”, undef water.. give or take.. and hated it..

I’m not seeing ponder in JJM at all..

Ponder was a pansy who couldn’t lead..

JjM is a kid with heart and desire..

If ST had done their fn job, he could well have had a CFB win that would have been a good offset for his jitters and outright bad throws..

To pretend his throws are trash is bias..

Gerald Goff has been horrible tonight in crunch time and on ALL his passes..

Shit happens.


JJM is our future..

Deal with it.

Dump Thielen, smith , Jones, Hockenson and keep drafting OL players like Jackson..

Nailor is money for his cost.

His throws right now are trash. Of course we get to see if he can improve. But to pretend what he did today wasn't trash is laughable. You can't continue to be that inaccurate and play in this league. I'm not saying he's Ponder but so far he's probably worse comparatively. I do like the fact that he ups his game when it counts at the end of games though. The rest of the season is an exercise in seeing what we have in him. Plain and simple.
Post #: 1298
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/17/2025 7:20:04 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Daniel Lee Young

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richard Neussendorfer

quote:

ORIGINAL: marty

14-3 had the 1st 4 scoring drives go for a FG, threw 4 INTs, but had the team in a position to win with 3 points.

1st 4 drives for 3 points, 1-4-3: 14-3.

4 INTs, but 3 points away, 61 yards away. So 3 points away, despite 4 Is : 3-4I, which is 14-3 backwards.

The numbers mean something, there is something in the numbers.

Darnold isn't taking anyone to the promised land. Is he better than JJ? Sure. So what. I'd like this team to have an actual franchise qb one day.
. It’s been 5 games..

I’m fine with him learning things like touch, passing lanes, moving in the pocket and running when he can..

He is ****ing 22..

When I was 22, I was a “ in excess of 400 feet”, undef water.. give or take.. and hated it..

I’m not seeing ponder in JJM at all..

Ponder was a pansy who couldn’t lead..

JjM is a kid with heart and desire..

If ST had done their fn job, he could well have had a CFB win that would have been a good offset for his jitters and outright bad throws..

To pretend his throws are trash is bias..

Gerald Goff has been horrible tonight in crunch time and on ALL his passes..

Shit happens.


JJM is our future..

Deal with it.

Dump Thielen, smith , Jones, Hockenson and keep drafting OL players like Jackson..

Nailor is money for his cost.

His throws right now are trash. Of course we get to see if he can improve. But to pretend what he did today wasn't trash is laughable. You can't continue to be that inaccurate and play in this league. I'm not saying he's Ponder but so far he's probably worse comparatively. I do like the fact that he ups his game when it counts at the end of games though. The rest of the season is an exercise in seeing what we have in him. Plain and simple.


Yes, for example the go-ahead TD late that would have been the game winner except for the sorry ass special teams.
Post #: 1299
RE: General Vikes Talkk - 11/17/2025 7:31:28 AM   
Bill Johanesen


Posts: 31472
Status: offline
If Dallas wins tonight we take sole possession of the #12 draft slot. Lots of good competition seeded higher, but that's why you play the game.

< Message edited by Bill Johanesen -- 11/17/2025 7:35:15 AM >
Post #: 1300
Page:   <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talkk Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode