djskillz
Posts: 56863
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
|
I think the big thing is age. Guys like Pujols, Miggy, Fielder, and yes, Mauer, were essentially paid for what they had already done. Kind of "make up" contracts for the peanuts they were making before relative to production, when you factor in age. Stanton and Trout are so young, they're kind of a different breed. You're not really paying for "massive downside" years with either of them. Hell, Stanton's actually may have just been for show if the opt-out is 2019 or 2020. Stanton would just be about 30 and would probably test the market and maybe get more. Meanwhile the Marlins can say "Look, we committed to $325" with perhaps no intention to actually do so. Obviously not saying a 13 year deal doesn't have immense risk; of course it does. But I can see both sides of it.
_____________________________
"People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring."
|