Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports Talk Vikes and Other MN Sports

Forums  Register  Login  My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums 

Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ  Ticket List  Log Out

RE: General Vikes Talk

 
Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  159 160 [161] 162 163   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:05:02 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 4001
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:06:18 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

I guess the best way to say it for me would anybody be happy if moments after our team was vanquished by the 49ers largely because our OLine got completely destroyed by the 9er DLine that our big move to improve this giant hole in the roster would be to move our worst OLineman to RG, and move his backup in to start at LG?

Pretty insane on its face...

Add in the fact that we invested heavily in a qb that requires protection to be successful.

All QBs require protection to be successful. A lot of people think Cousins needs more protection than most to be successful. He was very successful last year. Did he get better protection than most QBs?
He was a top five rated QB while passing under pressure. I think the idea that Cousins needs more protection that most QBs is a myth.

< Message edited by kgdabom -- 9/2/2020 10:10:06 AM >


_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 4002
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:10:40 AM   
Brad H


Posts: 22989
Joined: 8/16/2007
From: Parts Unknown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: kurt bilben

I guess the best way to say it for me would anybody be happy if moments after our team was vanquished by the 49ers largely because our OLine got completely destroyed by the 9er DLine that our big move to improve this giant hole in the roster would be to move our worst OLineman to RG, and move his backup in to start at LG?

Pretty insane on its face...

Add in the fact that we invested heavily in a qb that requires protection to be successful.

He was very successful last year. Did he get protection?

Cousins had the #13 QB Rating in the league and was 7th worst in quarterback fumbles.

_____________________________

Defense starts at the corners!
Post #: 4003
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:25:48 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17929
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online
Clearly IOL is the weak link of this team. Our best IOLineman in Kline was cut and replaced with a career back up.

Upgrading Dozier or Elf seemed like the more prudent move necessary to improve the team vs upgrading Odinigbo.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 4004
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:44:17 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

< Message edited by Pager -- 9/2/2020 10:45:55 AM >


_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4005
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:54:17 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro
Clearly IOL is the weak link of this team. Our best IOLineman in Kline was cut and replaced with a career back up.
Upgrading Dozier or Elf seemed like the more prudent move necessary to improve the team vs upgrading Odinigbo.


They hired Dennison and Kubiak to fix the problem....so it is still on them and they added pieces.....Elf, O'Neil, Samia, Cleveland, Bradbury, Udoh, etc.

Cut Elf and Gedeon and throw 3-4 million at a OG FA....still time if they don't have a fix now.

Again here is the 2015 Denver OLine that won the SB:
T Ryan Harris 30 8 16 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 70th pick / 2007
LG Evan Mathis 34 10 12 Carolina Panthers / 3rd / 79th pick / 2005
C Matt Paradis 26 1 16 Denver Broncos / 6th / 207th pick / 2014
RG Louis Vasquez 28 6 15 San Diego Chargers / 3rd / 78th pick / 2009
RT Michael Schofield 25 1 13 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 95th pick / 2014

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4006
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 10:57:03 AM   
Bill Jandro

 

Posts: 17929
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro
Clearly IOL is the weak link of this team. Our best IOLineman in Kline was cut and replaced with a career back up.
Upgrading Dozier or Elf seemed like the more prudent move necessary to improve the team vs upgrading Odinigbo.


They hired Dennison and Kubiak to fix the problem....so it is still on them and they added pieces.....Elf, O'Neil, Samia, Cleveland, Bradbury, Udoh, etc.

Cut Elf and Gedeon and throw 3-4 million at a OG FA....still time if they don't have a fix now.

Again here is the 2015 Denver OLine that won the SB:
T Ryan Harris 30 8 16 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 70th pick / 2007
LG Evan Mathis 34 10 12 Carolina Panthers / 3rd / 79th pick / 2005
C Matt Paradis 26 1 16 Denver Broncos / 6th / 207th pick / 2014
RG Louis Vasquez 28 6 15 San Diego Chargers / 3rd / 78th pick / 2009
RT Michael Schofield 25 1 13 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 95th pick / 2014

Clearly Spielman didn't have a hand in drafting that Denver oline.

_____________________________

Oline...early and often this draft
Post #: 4007
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 11:00:19 AM   
Phil Riewer


Posts: 27446
Joined: 8/24/2007
From: MN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro
Clearly IOL is the weak link of this team. Our best IOLineman in Kline was cut and replaced with a career back up.
Upgrading Dozier or Elf seemed like the more prudent move necessary to improve the team vs upgrading Odinigbo.


They hired Dennison and Kubiak to fix the problem....so it is still on them and they added pieces.....Elf, O'Neil, Samia, Cleveland, Bradbury, Udoh, etc.

Cut Elf and Gedeon and throw 3-4 million at a OG FA....still time if they don't have a fix now.

Again here is the 2015 Denver OLine that won the SB:
T Ryan Harris 30 8 16 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 70th pick / 2007
LG Evan Mathis 34 10 12 Carolina Panthers / 3rd / 79th pick / 2005
C Matt Paradis 26 1 16 Denver Broncos / 6th / 207th pick / 2014
RG Louis Vasquez 28 6 15 San Diego Chargers / 3rd / 78th pick / 2009
RT Michael Schofield 25 1 13 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 95th pick / 2014

Clearly Spielman didn't have a hand in drafting that Denver oline.


If I tweeted it to him he would be drooling....nothing higher than a 3rd rounder.

_____________________________

SSG Riewer, Greg A Co 2/136 CAB
KIA 23 March 2007 Habbaniyah Iraq
Post #: 4008
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 11:01:27 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

I was looking at his pay for 20-23 since you were showing the 5th year as an option. I should have been looking at 21-24. That's where I got the disconnect between your numbers and DLs. My apologies to DL as his numbers were the same as yours except spread over 5 years not 4.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 4009
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 11:13:37 AM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phil Riewer

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro
Clearly IOL is the weak link of this team. Our best IOLineman in Kline was cut and replaced with a career back up.
Upgrading Dozier or Elf seemed like the more prudent move necessary to improve the team vs upgrading Odinigbo.


They hired Dennison and Kubiak to fix the problem....so it is still on them and they added pieces.....Elf, O'Neil, Samia, Cleveland, Bradbury, Udoh, etc.

Cut Elf and Gedeon and throw 3-4 million at a OG FA....still time if they don't have a fix now.

Again here is the 2015 Denver OLine that won the SB:
T Ryan Harris 30 8 16 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 70th pick / 2007
LG Evan Mathis 34 10 12 Carolina Panthers / 3rd / 79th pick / 2005
C Matt Paradis 26 1 16 Denver Broncos / 6th / 207th pick / 2014
RG Louis Vasquez 28 6 15 San Diego Chargers / 3rd / 78th pick / 2009
RT Michael Schofield 25 1 13 Denver Broncos / 3rd / 95th pick / 2014

Clearly Spielman didn't have a hand in drafting that Denver oline.


If I tweeted it to him he would be drooling....nothing higher than a 3rd rounder.

4 out of the 5 are 3rd rounders. Not bad draft capital.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 4010
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 11:49:51 AM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4011
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 12:31:17 PM   
kevinemmer


Posts: 4659
Joined: 7/16/2007
From: Bozeman, MT
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bill Jandro

Clearly IOL is the weak link of this team. Our best IOLineman in Kline was cut and replaced with a career back up.

Upgrading Dozier or Elf seemed like the more prudent move necessary to improve the team vs upgrading Odinigbo.


YES!!!

< Message edited by kevinemmer -- 9/2/2020 12:32:30 PM >
Post #: 4012
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 12:51:20 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

I was looking at his pay for 20-23 since you were showing the 5th year as an option. I should have been looking at 21-24. That's where I got the disconnect between your numbers and DLs. My apologies to DL as his numbers were the same as yours except spread over 5 years not 4.


11.3M of that money is not in years 21-24. Through the next 5 seasons he gets appx $48M.

< Message edited by thebigo -- 9/2/2020 12:53:43 PM >
Post #: 4013
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 12:52:58 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

I was looking at his pay for 20-23 since you were showing the 5th year as an option. I should have been looking at 21-24. That's where I got the disconnect between your numbers and DLs. My apologies to DL as his numbers were the same as yours except spread over 5 years not 4.


11.3M of that money is not in years 21-24


It's a 4 year extension. The 10M signing bonus is new money and part of the 48M.
Post #: 4014
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 1:09:46 PM   
Tom Sykes

 

Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

Can they block? No.

But people are underestimating how terrific our IOL has been getting at recovering fumbles.
Post #: 4015
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 1:21:19 PM   
Bruce Johnson

 

Posts: 16353
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

Can they block? No.

But people are underestimating how terrific our IOL has been getting at recovering fumbles.


The Vikings offensive line ranks third in the NFL at recovering fumbles. (I made this up.)


_____________________________

We live in a world where we depend upon each other. In other words, we need each other just as God needs us and we need Him. How wonderful it would be if we could unite and live in harmony. Wouldn't it be better that way?
Post #: 4016
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 1:29:02 PM   
beo

 

Posts: 2396
Joined: 3/18/2009
Status: offline
I'm not sure how to feel about the Reiff thing...

Are we better with him? Maybe...
The idea that you were basically willing to let the guy walk... but now he is your best option at LT? Doesn't sit great.

If before the offseason you told me the starting 2020 line would be:
LT Reiff
LG Dozier
C Bradbury
RG Elf
RT O'Neil

1) I wouldn't be impressed.
2) I'd say I think it highly unlikely we'll do nothing to add starters.

If they get manhandled by GB... which i think is likely... it's going to be another crappy day in a crappy year.

BUT I HOPE TO HECK I"M WRONG AND DOZIER/ELF IMPRESS!
That would be a nice surprise.
Post #: 4017
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 1:30:24 PM   
Pager


Posts: 10500
Joined: 7/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

Can they block? No.

But people are underestimating how terrific our IOL has been getting at recovering fumbles.



That's your takeaway?

Fumble recovery is unpredictable - 2018 we lost a ton, 2019 we didn't.

I was adding color to Brad's post. Cousins is above average in fumbling and below average in throwing interceptions.

_____________________________

Left picking up the pieces.
Post #: 4018
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 2:06:14 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

I was looking at his pay for 20-23 since you were showing the 5th year as an option. I should have been looking at 21-24. That's where I got the disconnect between your numbers and DLs. My apologies to DL as his numbers were the same as yours except spread over 5 years not 4.


11.3M of that money is not in years 21-24


It's a 4 year extension. The 10M signing bonus is new money and part of the 48M.


It's still a 5 year deal
Post #: 4019
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 2:22:34 PM   
David Levine


Posts: 77942
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Las Vegas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

I was looking at his pay for 20-23 since you were showing the 5th year as an option. I should have been looking at 21-24. That's where I got the disconnect between your numbers and DLs. My apologies to DL as his numbers were the same as yours except spread over 5 years not 4.


11.3M of that money is not in years 21-24


It's a 4 year extension. The 10M signing bonus is new money and part of the 48M.


It's still a 5 year deal


If that makes you feel vindicated instead of calling it a 4 year extension, all the more power to you.

But he signed a 4 year extension. The 1.3M base salary for 2020 is the final year of his rookie contract. The Bengals just split the bonus money into all 5 years he's under contract instead of the 4 new ones so he gets an extra 2.7M this year.
Post #: 4020
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 2:40:55 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

Right, that is why I think this Cousins falls apart under pressure stuff is a myth. He's very good under pressure. My favorite play of his under pressure was the TD to Rudolph to win the playoff game. He had two blitzers right in his face on that one.

_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 4021
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 2:43:26 PM   
kgdabom

 

Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

Can they block? No.

But people are underestimating how terrific our IOL has been getting at recovering fumbles.



_____________________________

"So let it be written.
So let it be done."
Post #: 4022
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 3:27:55 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bruce Johnson

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tom Sykes

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

I thought Cousins had 7 fumbles last year and 2 lost. The year before a high % of fumbles were lost.

Minnesota's Interception thrown rate was 9th best in the league last year at 1.71

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/pass-intercepted-pct

Mannion had 2 INTS in 21 attempts.

That's with the 27th worst passing oline in the league.

Can they block? No.

But people are underestimating how terrific our IOL has been getting at recovering fumbles.


The Vikings offensive line ranks third in the NFL at recovering fumbles. (I made this up.)



Daunte used to lead the league year after year
Post #: 4023
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 3:34:23 PM   
thebigo


Posts: 28303
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

quote:

ORIGINAL: kgdabom

quote:

ORIGINAL: David Levine

quote:

ORIGINAL: thebigo

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pager

Mixon Details:

Full details on the #Bengals deal for RB Joe Mixon’s 4-year, $48M deal:
— $10M signing bonus. $1.3M base in 2020.
— $8M base in 2021.
— $8M in 2022.
— $9.4M in 2023.
— Club option for $9.6M in 2024.
— $500K each year in playtime and $200K offseason workout bonus each year.


We'd have to backload a little more and 3M in incentives would have to be upped to 8-12M. Only 19M guarantted.

Not sure how that adds up to 48 million for four years


Mixon's deal?

10M Signing bonus
8M in 2021
8M in 2022
9.4M in 2023
9.6M in 2024
2M Playtime bonus
800K workout bonus
---------------------
47.8M

Seems close enough to call 48.

The numbers you provided might add up to 47.8. The numbers he was questioning didn't.



I was projecting what I would do for a Cook contract. Less base, more incentives. It's why I said "We'd" meaning the Vikings and implied a contract for Cook. We are also tighter against the cap and the contract would probably have to be backloaded more.

I was looking at his pay for 20-23 since you were showing the 5th year as an option. I should have been looking at 21-24. That's where I got the disconnect between your numbers and DLs. My apologies to DL as his numbers were the same as yours except spread over 5 years not 4.


11.3M of that money is not in years 21-24


It's a 4 year extension. The 10M signing bonus is new money and part of the 48M.


It's still a 5 year deal


If that makes you feel vindicated instead of calling it a 4 year extension, all the more power to you.

But he signed a 4 year extension. The 1.3M base salary for 2020 is the final year of his rookie contract. The Bengals just split the bonus money into all 5 years he's under contract instead of the 4 new ones so he gets an extra 2.7M this year.


He gets the full $10M SB this year, the cap hit is pro-rated over 5 years. Oh it feels so good saying that.
Post #: 4024
RE: General Vikes Talk - 9/2/2020 3:42:49 PM   
ratoppenheimer


Posts: 9563
Joined: 12/9/2007
From: cascais, portugal...still in exile
Status: offline
.
.
i think arif had fehr on the final 53....


Minnesota Vikings@Vikings
The #Vikings have placed DE Kenny Willekes on IR and waived RB Tony Brooks-James, LB Jordan Fehr, DE Stacy Keely and DE Anthony Zettel.

Arif Hasan, coach of throwing left American footballTrophy@ArifHasanNFL
First wave of cuts, my 53-man is already ruined.

_____________________________

the journey...is paradise.
Post #: 4025
Page:   <<   < prev  159 160 [161] 162 163   next >   >>
All Forums >> [The Minnesota Vikings] >> Vikes Talk >> RE: General Vikes Talk Page: <<   < prev  159 160 [161] 162 163   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode