Tom Sykes
Posts: 5872
Joined: 7/27/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: unome quote:
ORIGINAL: kurt bilben quote:
ORIGINAL: unome The IOL is tricky because we DID put assets into the line, they just have not panned out. First round pick at Center. Traded up in the Third to get the starting Right Guard. Traded up in the Fourth for another Guard (Samia). Had the latest Second Rounder playing there this camp. And IOL are the kinds of players that you should be able to get in the third and fourth rounds. Or even later. We have spent assets on the IOL, but we have failed to get solid results, at least so far, from almost all of the players. Something seems broken RE how we either assess or coach the O-line. Maybe both. I hear what you’re saying, however the proof is kind of in the pudding at least for this off-season. Any plan that included moving Elflein to starting RG, and his backup to take over his LG spot for the opening game vs GB is a massive failure. Hopefully Oli Udoh, And Dru Samia (looking like a complete disaster at this point) somehow turn it on quickly. Perhaps Cleveland matures this year and beats out Reiff who I’m sure is trending out of the FO’s plans, but right now I have huge questions going up against the Puckers pass rush. Feels like we got worse duRing the off-season. Hell I would’ve kept Kline, and gone after another FA IOLineman if I felt our young guys weren’t improving. Now Covid19 could’ve had something to do with our lack of movement at this grouping, but it’s a huge concern for me going forward.. Hope I’m wrong. It seems that they had a big belief in some of the youngsters progressing. Samia, Udoh, maybe Collins. And, like pretty much everyone, cutting Kline seemed crazy at the time. Full disclosure: now that he has not found another team, it looks less unwise. But defending the Kline cut may be easier now, but why not pick up another FA Guard of a starter level? Were there really no one good enough available that fit our scheme? That seems unlikely. If we were using this as a rebuilding year, I guess their choices would be defensible, but we made the playoffs last year and the Yannick moves says that we are trying to win this year. I don't know. I don't get it. It's not you, it's the team that doesn't get it. Our strategy has been, as Childress or more importantly Immortan Joe would say, "Mediocre"! Draft one player in the first 4 rds, make some wild stabs in the later rounds, pick up a middling vet or two, and allow Cousins start another prayer group. Beavers Elflein Isidora O'Neill Gossett Bradbury Samia Udoh Cleveland Brandel Hinton 'has' (not the plural 'have' because that is one big amorphous blob of OL talent) produced one good starter (so far) in O'Neill and below average overall OL play. Our last game was freakin' abysmal how could we not be panicking and selling out for OL help? Sure, hopefully Bradbury makes a big leap this year and is average or better, and Cleveland / one of the late round stabs will end up being more than just depth – but only a true homer thinks that's a given. After the volcanic free agency eruption of Reiff and Remmers in 2017, we have augmented our draft strategy with Josh Andrews, Tom Compton, Bryan Witzmann, Josh Kline, Brett Jones, Dakota Dozier. I wonder if Hall had passed his physical, if we still would have signed Ngakoue ... probably. Our 'dire' cap situation seems only to be dire in relation to helping the OL, not the rest of the team and especially not the defense.
|