kgdabom
Posts: 33770
Joined: 7/29/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: unome quote:
ORIGINAL: kgdabom quote:
ORIGINAL: unome quote:
ORIGINAL: Bill Johanesen CMC 113 ypg Cook 104 ypg If you factor in the games they each missed, it become: CMC 113 ypg Cook 63 ypg Yeah that's fair?????? NOT!!!!!!! Last year he missed 2. If he keeps trending to missing less games than the year before he will never miss another game. Comparing yards per game and not ignoring the 19 missed games over 3 season, or more than one whole season, is totally fair especially when we talk about money they may earn in a year. If you have one employee that shows up 48 days in a time period and averages 113 units in that time period and another that averages 104 units, but shows up 29 days in that same time period, and misses 19 days for various reason, how much would you say the two people are worth? Are you really going to ignore the 19 missed days? The ability to stay healthy is a crucial thing in the NFL, especially for a Running Back. What would you say CMC trend of missing games is? Three season of 16 Games. Cook has never played 16 games. Trends are not Cook's friend in this case. Small sample size. A slight adjustment would be fair, but you can't average it out. Assuming that since a player has missed games in the past he will continue to miss games in the future has been disproved over and over. It can go the other way also. Karl-Anthony Towns was a total Iron Man for his career and this season he missed a million games. You can't predict the future. Next year McCaffrey could miss the entire season while Cook plays every game.
_____________________________
"So let it be written. So let it be done."
|